Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

FTP: Better Than HTTP, Or Obsolete?

Posted by timothy on from the don-your-holy-vestments dept.

An anonymous reader asks "Looking to serve files for downloading (typically 1MB-6MB), I'm confused about whether I should provide an FTP server instead of / as well as HTTP. According to a rapid Google search, the experts say 1) HTTP is slower and less reliable than FTP and 2) HTTP is amateur and will make you look a wimp. But a) FTP is full of security holes. and b) FTP is a crumbling legacy protocol and will make you look a dinosaur. Surely some contradiction... Should I make the effort to implement FTP or take desperate steps to avoid it?"

1 of 870 comments (clear)

  1. Different, not better or wose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They serve different purposes, and each was designed to meet those needs. Each one has its own positives and negatives.