Slashdot Mirror


Red Hat, Oracle to get Gov't Certification for Linux

Mark writes "As this news.com article states, 'Red Hat and Oracle plan to announce on Thursday that the companies have teamed to get Linux evaluated under the Common Criteria, a certification that could open doors for the broader use of open-source software by government agencies.' It looks like this will be an important step in getting Linux to be more widely adopted in governments around the world."

7 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Germany by intermodal · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's good to know the US Government is catching up technologically with the Germans...again...

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  2. Re:RHAS again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    RHAS is free...They don't provide an iso for you, but check their website, they do provide step-by-step instructions on how to "create" a RHAS installation for free.

    But for those that want service and don't want the hastle of putting all the pieces together they also provide a nice package.

    As far as windows a bargain, how much does quality node-balancing software cost (~$500), Quality Firewall (~$300), Advanced Server ($750), I could keep going but I think you get the picture. If you don't need HA then RHAS isn't a great deal, but then again if you do, MS doesn't have a competive product...say what you want about 2000&XP (big improvement over NT&9x), you can't call them HA.

    BTBTBT

    scooby

  3. Re:Is Larry making a stand? by speeding_cat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We are going to use Unix and Linux as the evaluation platforms for our products in the future, and not Windows, because the customer demand for Windows is not there," she said. "Frankly, there is a fair amount of disenchantment with Microsoft products because of security problems." ... said Mary-Ann Davidson, chief security officer for Oracle.

    Wow. I knew Larry hated Bill and MS, but I sure wouldn't have expected this! Or is he just conceding the Windows server database market to Bill and trying to grow the Linux market on the low end + the UNIX market at the higher end?


    Smart companies try to transform complementary products of other companies into commodity items. OS for Oracle nicely fits into this picture. Since they need it anyway, might as well be inexpensive Linux. Also, one more Linux system - one less Windows system that could run MSSQL instead of Oracle. The choice to support Linux is really no brainer for Larry the Nut.

    Linux port should also be relatively cheap for Oracle, since it is very much like standard Unix and Oracle tends to use basic OS facilities anyway.

  4. This is not a Dupe! by MrByte420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not a dupe. The story from yesterday is about how the DoD has certified RedHat server as a common operating environment. This story talks about how IBM and Oracle are attempting to get Linux certified on a wider federal level so that agencies can be permitted to use it. They are two different certifications and two different issues and hence two different stories.

    I'm always amazed by the number of clarivoyant slashdot users we have around here who don't need to read a story before posting...

    --
    If religous zealots don't believe in Evolution, then why are they so worried about bird flu?
  5. Re:Frankly... by jeff4747 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The NT crap comments arose because NT only got CC it's certification _without_ a network connection.

    And as for the other point, wouldn't level 2 be a step towards level 4? Ya gotta start somewhere, and level 2 opens a lot of doors.

  6. Government...been there, done that by frozencesium · · Score: 5, Informative

    um, the NSA has already modified linux (the kernel) so that it will meet their standards. redhat is named as a tested distro...see this for details. The biggest problem is that the US government seems to think that they must rely on M$ software (in the unclassified environment at least) for things like exchange and ease of use for the "typical" user.

    this is simple posturing at it's finest. of course...the government's high performance systems (read clusters) aren't running windows anyway. this won't change anything.

    -frozen

    --
    I'm not always the brightest pixel in the stream
  7. Re:dupe? No. This is different. by The_Dougster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This seems to be another type of cert.

    This is a good thing as the US DoD uses ADA95 for most everything AFAIK and the GNAT compiler works just dandy with Linux. This is what DoD needs, an inexpensive, yet totally robust system which they can put unleash the military programmers on.

    A good example is BRL-Cad which is available for free download by US Citizens. This is a nice OpenGL capable solid modeler, somewhat clunky, but probably better than any other free CAD program available for Linux right now.

    I'm a veteran of the US Military, and I think that Linux is a great choice for them, since they have the capability to provide cheap, effective, and efficient training about their computer systems to all the members of the armed forces. The US Military could easily train several million service personnel to be effective Linux programmers in a quite short period of time.

    And of course, as a taxpaying citizen, I want my armed forces buying the best weaponry, not lining some 2-bit computer software vendor's pockets, especially when those vendors undermine the rights of the citizens by channeling that money back into lobbying for laws like the DMCA.

    This is where RedHat shines. I use Debian myself, but Debian is too chaotic to apply for these certifications; however, RedHat could make a killing by supplying the US Government their software, and since Linux is Linux is Linux, this gives my government the state of the art software: it is secure, it is robust, it is inexpensive, and it is the best development environment in the world!

    --
    Clickety Click ...