Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

AMD's Athlon-64 Benchmarked With UT2003

Posted by chrisd on from the portable-64-bit-goodness dept.

Sander Sassen writes "Wondering about the performance of AMD's Athlon-64? Want to how well it runs in 64-bit mode? Hardware Analysis managed to run a few benchmarks on a AMD Athlon-64 demo system using the 64-bit version of Epic' Unreal Tournament 2003. There's also an update with the latest about Athlon-64, Opteron and mobile Athlon-64 including streaming video and pictures of a quad Opteron server."

15 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Re:THANK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    much better then to chime in with a me too on a high rated post and hope someone has pity enough to mod you.

    Please die.

  2. Re:I licked my lips... by jkrise · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    " You're obviously not a real geek."

    A real geek is never straightforward. He's got lots of hidden depths(!), is shy, reticient and timid. He hides his talents and pretends to get kicks, like 'normal' folks. Obviously, you're not a real geek, since you couldn't figure out my deception.

    Most moderators are Morons. Sensible moderators are Oxymorons.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  3. Re:THANK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    No one lives forever; in fact, we all die.

  4. Re:slashdottet already? by vb.warrior · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Because cpu speed is obviously the only thing that determines a server performance.. oh forgot, this is slashdot, the people with knowledge either fucked off or have started trolling.

  5. Re:THANK YOU! by Svartalf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And you had to post that anonymously. Shameful really- I was complimenting someone, not doing a me-too.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  6. buy it? I think not by Gryftir · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I think I'm with google about this.

    I don't need it, not even for games. Sure it will run faster, but do you seriously need that speed? I know I can find a better use for money. Or I could if I actually had some money. Gryftir

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  7. ./ effect, baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Haha:

    There are 10 registered and 2891 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2170.98 kbit/s

    When just three days ago, according to Google cache:

    There are 8 registered and 306 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 77.31 kbit/s

  8. Re:THANK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    contrary to popular belief, not everyone that browses this site gives a shit about karma, nor thinks that is worth the time and effort to actually register.

    and yes, i am fully aware of how long it would take to register.

  9. Re:THANK YOU! by gregfortune · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Please, please register. Then we can track you down and tug on your funny little troll ears ;o) I've always wanted to meet a troll in person...

  10. OT: UT2003 port for Mac OS X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hi,

    any news about the UT2003 port for Mac OS X?

    Thanks!

  11. Re:THANK YOU! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    then?

    you stupid fucking hick it's THAN

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  12. Page crashes Moz 1.2.1 by Daengbo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mozilla has crashed on this page 3 times, just totally hanging, requiring a kill. Anyone else having this problem? Are they using some strange Flash or something? Can't get to the page to find out.

    --
    Put identity in the browser.
  13. Re:Whoa! by n1k0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Keiner macht fur dich mehr! :-)

    niko

  14. Re:Isn't this story a duplicate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    No, you remember incorrectly. They tested a "Barton" Athlon XP, not an Opteron.

    YHBT HAND

  15. Re:Worthless by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Who marked this as a troll?

    It was painfully obvious that the reviewers had no idea what they were doing.