Slashdot Mirror


From DRM to Rights Management Services

miladus writes "Microsoft has formed an academic Think Tank on Trustworthy Computing. The Academic Board is to advise Microsoft on 'security, privacy and reliability enhancements in[...] products and technologies so that Microsoft can obtain critical feedback on product and policy issues related to its Trustworthy Computing.' An interview with two members of the board is an interesting read, especially concerning the global implications of privacy. Of note, is the absence of DRM discussion. But DRM shows up as 'Rights Management Services' in the promised Widows Rights Management Services to be released later this year. it will deliver a 'platform-based approach to persistent policy rights for Web content and sensitive corporate documents of all types'"

1 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The question is... by kfg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Indeed, it is the first duty of every scientist to show the other guy where he's full of crap. That is the essence of science. Finding the flaws.

    Lord knows I've been shown to be full of crap often enough.

    Richard Feynman was *famous* for being full of crap nearly all the time. It's that *nearly* that gets you. One of the great things about Richard is that he never, ever, self censored. He was willing be full of crap most of the time. It's an essential part of the process, but most people don't like to look "silly" so they hold back.

    "Here's my idea."

    "Here's where it's wrong."

    "Oh, *THANK* you!"

    That's the way it's supposed to work.

    Commercial "science" almost always turns into a political issue of some sort. They're there to promote a concept. Not to find the truth.

    It stinks.

    KFG