Los Alamos Security Infiltrated By Reporter

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Los Alamos Security Infiltrated By Reporter

Posted by timothy on Tuesday February 25, 2003 @06:50AM from the and-you-were-expecting-what dept.

morcheeba writes "Wired reported Noah Shachtman gives a first-hand account of his entry into a high-security area at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Yes, there are pictures. It seems that the birthplace of the atom bomb is being guarded by string, backed up by guards with empty holsters. There's a little more info on Noah's Defense Tech website."

10 of 375 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

THROOD POST by Anonymous Coward · 2003-02-25 06:52 · Score: -1, Offtopic

IIS MINE
1. Re:THROOD POST by cheeseSource · 2003-02-25 07:05 · Score: 0, Offtopic
  
  This is my first throod post and it is first post. Oh the joy...I am so proud of my little post. One day I will have a cluster of theese....
  
  --
  
  (Sponsored by atheism: the real world even in all its gore is better than make-believe)
  
  --
  (Sponsored by cheeseSource for President 2012)
If this is not the first post... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-02-25 06:52 · Score: -1, Offtopic

I will go to my local police department and have sex with a dead warthog in the back of a police cruiser.
Links to pictures will be posted.
WATS UP SALSHDOT by Anonymous Coward · 2003-02-25 06:52 · Score: -1, Offtopic

u know u like it lololooloolloolloll
Re:Worthless. by GuyMannDude · 2003-02-25 06:54 · Score: -1, Offtopic

This article is so full of technical inaccuracies that it isn't worth considering. Pure theater.

Would you care to point some of them out for us, please?

GMD

--
watch this
So THAT'S who bought it! by Kombat · 2003-02-25 06:55 · Score: 0, Offtopic

I was wondering who'd actually bid on
this thing on eBay.

--
Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
Re:Worthless. by Dai-Sho · 2003-02-25 07:04 · Score: 0, Offtopic

For example?
this article was by Anonymous Coward · 2003-02-25 07:06 · Score: -1, Offtopic

That GNU-Darwin people decides not to link to "proprietary" libraries is, of course, a result of them using the GNU Public License so extensively-- and now the primary supported Darwin platform is not even supported in this project!

This makes me shake my head and think "what the fuck." This project is not only shooting itself in the foot by choosing a platform not fully supported by the OS, but is also screwing over the real meat of Darwin's userbase: PowerPC owners. This move is akin to opening a car garage (in America) whose mechanics are all experienced in servicing American cars, and then changing policy months later, stating that the garage will only work on foreign models.

Where's the fucking logic?

Seriously, am I the only one who is wondering who the Hell is in charge at that project? Kool-Aid Man? This move makes so little sense I can't tell if the people at GNU-Darwin are really that stupid, or if I am waking up in alternate realities every damn morning. I almost kind of hope for the latter.

This is the GPL in action, Mac faithful. Get down and kiss Apple's butt for choosing the BSD license.
Re:Borders by jaysones · 2003-02-25 07:23 · Score: 0, Offtopic

I think you mean "it takes FEET to sneak across the US-Mexico border."
The TRUTH about FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · 2003-02-25 07:39 · Score: -1, Offtopic

I find it interesting that Slashdot will post all of these stories about LANL and security but they refuse to tell the story of one of their users that was murdered by FreeBSD users. DonkPunch has been missing for over a year, the cold-blooded psychos that killed him are roaming free, and Slashdot is silent. What is wrong with this picture?