Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Scores Another Patent

theodp writes "Chalk up yet another patent for Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, this time for a Method and system for conducting a discussion relating to an item."

4 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. Lets look at the first claim by ajakk · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. A method in a computer system of a non-participant for starting a discussion relating to an item offered for sale, the method including:
    This is the preamble. In most cases, the preamble does not actually limit the claim. So let look at the elements of the claim and see if they have been done before.
    providing information describing a plurality of items being offered for sale;
    So it is showing a bunch of items.
    receiving from an originating participant a selection of one of the items being offered for sale;
    The client selects one of the items.
    providing to the originating participant information describing the selected item offered for sale and an indicator for starting a discussion relating to the item being offered for sale, the information and the indicator to be displayed to the originating participant;
    The client gets information about one of the items and the client is told that he can start a discussion on the item.
    in response to selection of the displayed indicator by the originating participant of the discussion, providing to the originating participant an initial discussion thread that includes a description of the item being offered for sale;
    If the client "selects the displayed indicator" (clicks on a link) a new discussion thread is created where there is a description of the item for sell.
    receiving from the originating participant comments to be added to the discussion thread;
    The client adds comments.
    receiving from the originating participant an indication of one or more other participants of the discussion;
    The client notes that he (and perhaps others) is going to be a participant in the discussion.
    providing the discussion thread, with the description of the item and the received comments added along with a link that when selected effects the placing of an order to purchase the item, to the one or more other participants, and
    Now other people see a link to the discussion thread.
    tracking the discussion thread as one or more of the participants add comments to the discussion.
    The discussions thread is "tracked". Sending out emails as it is updated is probably enough.
    The first claim is probably easily beaten. You would need to find something published or publically known on or before August 1st, 1998 which satisfies all of the above elements/limitations. Of course, there is the doctrine of obviousness (which this could probably be beaten under), but looking at the claims, it might be hard to find something that actually beats this under anticipation. This is especially true considering how limited some of these claims appear.

  2. Usenet? by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would think any number of usenet *.forsale groups would provide prior art to counter this patent (epecially claim 12). Ott.forsale has been around a lot longer than Amazon.com, and provides exactly what this patent describes.

  3. BN.com links in /. book reviews are prior art by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    which targets merchandise (almost unlike /.)

    What about Slashdot Book Reviews, which include a link to purchase a copy of the book at Barnes & Noble?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  4. Straight to the Source by FunkyMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to the patent document, these are the people responsible for granting this patent:

    Primary Examiner: Kincaid; Kristine
    Assistant Examiner: Nguyen; Thomas T.
    Attorney, Agent or Firm: Perkins Coie LLP

    Can't we just contact them and ask them how much they were paid to grant this crap? Seriously, maybe someone could ask them what they are thinking.