Slashdot Mirror


Baby Bells Promise Broadband Stagnation

twitter writes "According to this NYT article the Baby Bells will not be developing their 'high-speed networks' despite their recently granted DSL monopoly because they were not granted local phone monopolies. 'Here is a lot of crying crybaby reaction to the decision.' says Mr. Powell."

3 of 414 comments (clear)

  1. A Future Bell Monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's a look at the Bells' work to tax VoIP in a similar move to the ones they made in the early days of DSL. The eventual goal of moves like this would be to push non-Bells out of VoIP so they can then have yet another monopoly.

  2. Your argument doesn't hold water. by sean.peters · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The ILECs have only themselves to blame for losing money on each DSL line. The terms of the original deregulation agreement were that the ILECs had to lease capacity to CLECs at the same rates as they leased them to their own broadband subsidiaries. Since they lease to their subsidiaries at below cost rates in an effort to make them appear more profitable, they are forced to offer the same artificially low price to their competitors. If they would stop whining about this situation and raise the rates for themselves as well as their competitors, maybe they wouldn't be in such a fix... but they'd rather cry to the government, hoping Uncle Sam will make the big bad Earthlinks of the world go away and leave them alone. Sean

  3. Re:The choice is theirs by murphyslawyer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Okay, I am feeling the need to clear up a common misconception - neither the Baby Bells, or any other company, has any responsibility to the public whatsoever. Just because the public may have paid for some of the lines, they are not then forced to act in some manner which wouldn't be maximally profitable out of thanks if they are not contractually obligated. They have a responsibility to make money for their owners. That is why companies exist, to make money. They should use every legal means in their power to do so.

    It is the government's job to force companies to act in a legal and socially moral way through regulation and to slap down those companies that get out of line. It is the job of the people to get the government to do so in the way they want.

    Of course, having said that, corporations have far more power these days in determining what goes into regulations than the people, because the lawmakers have been bribed with fat donations, and nobody ever gets slapped down for breaking the rules.

    Don't get upset with the corporations for acting like greedy little piggies. Get upset with the system that allows them to get away with it, and try to change it.

    --
    I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.