ATM Iris Recognition Coming Soon

Anonymous Cow writes "In Australia, iris technology is already being used by Qantas Airlines, Sydney Airport, foreign embassies, some banks and TAFE colleges, the Australian Protective Services, the Defence Department and the Police Integrity Commission. It is predicted that within five years every ATM in Australia will have iris recognition technology."

Comments

Why is this bad?

[Ars-Fartsica]

ATM transactions already create a full audit trail of your banking habits. At least this way, someone has to steal your eyeball and not just your card and PIN. The audit trail and data mining on your account takes place either way.

f we're going to live in a database society at least I want some assurance that my identity is proven with more than a plastic card and a four digit password.

Re:Why is this bad?

[ackthpt]

At least this way, someone has to steal your eyeball and not just your card and PIN.

My eyeball? Man, I like to think my eyeball is one heck of a lot more important that whatever is in my checking or savings account. Someone carves out my eye and I'm sure I'll not be worrying about mere money.

(Many years ago I bought a new car. Really sharp and very classy. I was pretty proud and happy to drive it around and show it off. 45 days later I was diagnosed with cancer. The car went from pride and joy to just some object.)

There's also this thing about totally ruthless people. If they need your fingerprint, they don't think much of cutting off your finger to take it with them. So, what's to stop them from taking your eye? Advances in security are met with advances in criminal technique. Best to keey your eyes in a safe deposit box.

Re:Why is this bad?

[Greyfox]

Because they have to STEAL your EYEBALL! Christ man, didn't you even think about what you were saying?

On a more serious note (As if eyeball stealing wasn't serious enough) no security system is perfect. Someone WILL crack that security. Some loophole will be found because some loophole always is. Nothing a human being can make can be perfect. Now imagine the poor guy who has to prove that a string of ATM transactions into his checking account didn't come from him. Everyone will assume that biometrics can't be beat and that guy will have no recourse except to eat his losses.

Likewise, biometrics can change. How will that guy get his money from ATMs once criminals steal his eyeballs? Lets say for the sake of argument that great advances in eyeball stealing technology are made, to the point where a criminal can just pop them out while you're standing in line at the grocery. One minute you're counting your sausages, the next minute you have no eyeballs. You might not even notice for a couple of minutes. You'd be all like... "Hey... didn't I have eyeballs a minute ago?" Then you go up to the cash register to pay and you can't prove your identity because someone just made off with your eyeballs. Very embarassing.

From time to time I get into something that causes an allergic reaction that in turn causes some nasty skin peeling on my hands. During that time my fingerprints are completely obscured (You have no idea how much grip fingerprints give you until you don't have them, let me tell you...) If my bank were relying competely on fingerprints for me to prove who I was, I'd be up the creek with no food to by groceries or eyeball stealing equipment until my fingerprints grew back.

In a nutshell, I don't trust any identifying feature (including social security number) that can't be easily paired with a secret and changed at a moment's notice.

Which means

[Apreche]

That there is a database somewhere that matches their eyeballs with their personal information. Sorry, but I'd rather not have another database with my info in it.

No. really. they *won't* scan me.

[Frymaster]

the problem with this is that carrying your id is now mandatory. i have a driver's license. it demonstrates to the authorities that i am qualified to drive. when i am not driving i do not carry my driver's license with me and i do not show it the police when i am not accused of a driving violation. i have a social insurance number. it is only to be used for taxation purposes. i give the number to no one else for no other reason. they have no need nor right to ask for it.

with iris recognition these two pieces of id are always on me.

I'll keep my PIN thanks.

[cosmosis]

Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I'll be damned if I submit to biometric identifiers to bank. It is afterall MY bank account that is insecure, not anyone elses, if I decide to remaim with using a so-called less secure PIN method. And only I to blame if someone steals it, which by the way has not happened once in all the years there has been a PIN number. I've been using ATM's since they were first introduced, and not once, have I had any security breach on my accont. Your crazy, if I'm going to let some corporation get their hands on my unique biometric identifiers which they will most likely sell to other companies. Before you know it, my biometric date will be on hundreds of databases outside of my control. My identity, both analog and digital is my own. Period.

Planet P Blog