How's Your Whuffie? Interview with Cory Doctorow
Richard Koman writes "My interview with EFF's Cory Doctorow just went up on O'Reilly. The interview is largely about his book, "Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom," but naturally veers towards discussing his view of Disney, programmers, and peer to peer. Then there's this: Doctorow: I think that Disney's art and technology kicks ass. But one thing you discover in the technology world, especially in free software, is that being a good programmer and being a good person are not necessarily correlated, or at least being a good programmer and being a person with whom other people want to spend a lot of time, who has good hygiene and good social skills, are not correlated."
He does mention in the article, though, that it's first-time authors that lack reputation: maybe this is an indication that he's doing this for his first book to build reputation and then he will be getting a 'traditional' book contract for future books? Either way I support him. More work in the commons is always a good thing.
Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).
being a good programmer and being a person with whom other people want to spend a lot of time, who has good hygiene and good social skills, are not correlated
Are people really still saying this about programmers? It's not 1989 any more. We may not be movie stars, but all the coders I know have sex at least semi-regularly, with people they don't have to pay. That indicates some level of grooming and social skills.
If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
If you figure out what a converse error is, maybe you'll become a better programmer in the process. Then you can work on the social skills and...ah, screw it; programming's good enough!
The ocean parts and the meteors come down
Laid out in amber, baby.
no, click on it and you see the past stories from the subject. this only has one story: Cory doctorow
How long will it take for people to realize that just putting stuff on the net for the world to download will not bring riches? Hell just doing that will incur serious bandwidth charges that....gasp.... you won't be able to pay!
Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
From the article:
Having just finished the book, I can tell you what to make of it: A poor ripoff of John Varley's The Phantom of Kansas with karma added. Oh, and whereas Varley managed to pack his ideas into a well-paced short story, this one dragged out for 208 pages as it subjected us to Disney technical minutiae on the way to a disappointing resolution.
At least I found out how the ghost hall works in the Haunted Mansion.
"200 Quatloos on the newcomer!" "300 Quatloos against!"
We may not be movie stars, but all the coders I know have sex at least semi-regularly, with people they don't have to pay.
Free sex? Remember, you get what you pay for.
Ed Wedig
Graphic design services
docbrown.net
And there is of course the assumption that if you aren't a freak then you obviously have no credibility. It's amazing to watch people cultivate their excentricity in a futile attempt to translate it into coolness. Posers are part of every culture, even the mass media mono-culture, and they are uniformly boring.
I wish people could just be OK with who they actually are.
-- "Most people prefer a popular myth to an unpopular truth"