Slashdot Mirror


CIPA Before The Supreme Court

Jim Tyre pointed out the excellent collection of links on censorware.net to coverage of yesterday's oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court about the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), as promised by this story last month. There's also a link to the place where transcripts of the oral arguments will show up about three weeks from now.

1 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. If you believe in censorship shut the f*ck up by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Children do not need 'protected' from pornography. Any twelve year old with a mind dirty enough to go searching for albino midget porn on google was already corrupt to begin with.

    The simple fact is porn is only easy to come by when you look for it. Just like in the real world, any responsible parent/teacher should supervise their children regardless of whether they are watching TV, using the Internet or walking down the street.

    It is common sense. We don't need new laws for the Internet, we need to educate judges on how to apply the old ones, because they work just fine.

    --


    - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.