Slashdot Mirror


Net Speed Record Smashed

BrianWCarver writes "The BBC is reporting that scientists have set a new internet speed record by transferring 6.7 gigabytes of data (the equivalent of 4 hours of DVD-quality movies) across 10,978 kilometres (6,800 miles), from Sunnyvale in the US to Amsterdam in Holland, in less than one minute. Average speed: more than 923 megabits per second, or more than 3,500 times faster than a typical home broadband connection. The data was sent across the Internet2 network. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (Slac) Computer Services participated in the record-breaking event. Slac has an interest in such high-speed transfers as they have accumulated the largest known database in the world, which grows at one terabyte per day."

15 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. It's a race... by elflet · · Score: 4, Informative

    What the article doesn't mention (and it's a virtual clone of SLAC's press release) is this is part of the Internet2 Land Speed Record competition. SLAC (working with a few others) holds both the previous record and the new one.

  2. SLAC by FosterSJC · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those wondering what the hell SLAC is, it stands for the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.

    Apparently, the SLAC library (SPIRES) stores pretty much every particle physics experiment data and write-up ever.

    Here is the pretty picture and their about page.

  3. Re:What media were they writing to? by elflet · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the purposes of the contest, they're not required to write to any media:
    In computing the amount of data transferred, only data transferred from user-process-space buffer(s) in the data-source network application to user-process-space buffer(s) in the data-sink network application may be counted.

  4. Video systems handle more than this by 1984 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a lot of data, and it's a fast network. But it's manageable as local I/O.

    In special effects work each frame is handled as an uncompressed TIFF at high res (I can't remember the exact bit depth and res). Previewing sequences means streaming these TIFF images. Adds up to about 400MB/s sustained (that's byte, not bit). HD video at 720p has similar requirements -- don't forget, you musn't drop any frames, and it has to arrive on time.

    I work in such an effects shop, and we've had several demos of HD-capable digital disk recorders over the last few months. Two out of three were based on Linux, and worked well (the other was custom). Twin Ultra 320 channels with software RAID across the two channels, XFS as a filesystem. They each did the job with a 2U enclosure full of largely stock components (except the video I/O board) -- and that's 3.2GBit/s I/O to the drive array.

    1. Re:Video systems handle more than this by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't remember the exact bit depth and res

      2048x1556, usually at 4 bytes per pixel. That might be packed as 12-bit RGB, or it might be float or log.

      Adds up to about 400MB/s sustained (that's byte, not bit).

      Your math is off. DPX's at 2K are only 12 MB per frame, and it's only 24 frames per second. That's 288 MB per second.

      HD video at 720p has similar requirements

      HD at 720p has requirements that are nowhere near those of 2K. A 720p stream at two bytes per pixel requires 110 MB/s, less than half that of 2K. Of course, it's not uncommon to do cross-fades and other real-time transitions in video production, so it's sometimes necessary to play back two streams simultaneously, for a total of 220 MB/s.

      --

      I write in my journal
  5. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    actually there are over 200 universities and labs that use internet2. so if you don't count those several million people, then you are right.

  6. Re:Yeah? What about their PING times by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Imagine, international internet gaming with low latencies all 'round. Sounds like a pipe dream.

    Unfortunately, it is. The two farthest points around earth are 12,000 miles. Round trip means 24,000 miles. Speed of light is 186,000 miles / second. That means that, best theoretical case, round trip is 129 milliseconds. Of course, you'll never get close to the best theoretical case, particularly with wire, never mind routers, etc.

    In the immortal words of John Carmack, "The Speed of Light Sucks".

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  7. No big deal. Canada has much faster network by jonbnews · · Score: 5, Informative
    Canada's CA*NET3 network can transmit the Library of Congress (LOC) in one second. It takes Internet2 a minute to do that. And the Canadian network has been deployed and operational for several years.

    Article here: http://chronicle.com/free/v45/i47/47a02101.htm.

  8. Re:Pfft. That's nothing. by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    He missed a . that would be .648 Gbps

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  9. Re:so it can transfer a lot of data quickly.... by snillfisk · · Score: 3, Informative

    10,978Km / c (speed of light) = (about) 0.0036 s
    At least 3.6ms latency. Likley in the 5ms range tho, considering cut-through times and propegation delays.

    or if you do it the right way (tm):

    10.978.000 / 300.000.000 =
    10.978 / 300.000 ~= 0,036593 -> 36.59ms

    (and you should probably get a better measure for both the distance and the speed of light :)
    --
    mats
    One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
  10. Re:Pfft. That's nothing. by kindbud · · Score: 4, Informative

    You have to write that 7000 Gb to 1000 tapes first. That will take MUCH longer than 24 hours, since you are limited to the speed of your SCSI bus and the speed and capacity of your tape robot.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  11. Re:Internet2? by pr0t3uS · · Score: 3, Informative
    Could Ihook up 6 PCs with 1000mb ehternet (or someething like that), call it internet 3, and thus set a new official speed record for the old school internet because both use tcp/ip?


    You can do that but the results are measured in terabit-meters/second.

    In case of the Single Stream Class IPv6 record that we still hold 675 Mb was transfered from Ljubljana over Vienna to New York and back over London, Paris, Geneve, Milan to Madrid making a total of 14.800 km of network with the average speed of 348 megabits/s and Data Transfer Speed of 5154 terabit-meters/second.

    To cut the long story short: the speed is not the only thing important in such projects.

    I will also use this opportunity to say: way to go ARNES and keep up the good work.
  12. Re:Wow.. Thats fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You transferred 600Mb (Megabits) which is equal to 75MB (MegaBytes) in about a minute. Wow, really impressive.

    Yes, there is a difference between Mb and MB. I am assuming you meant MB, but you shouldn't rely on people to assume what you meant when you flub the units. You would no doubt call me on it if I said my penis was 6 ft long.

  13. Re:so it can transfer a lot of data quickly.... by Agent+Green · · Score: 2, Informative

    Add in that the speed of light is measured through a vacuum. Put in through something like fiber and the maximum speed is cut to 2/3 max.

    10,978 km / (300,000 km/sec * .667) =
    10,978 kn / (200,100 km/sec) = 54.86 ms.

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
  14. Re:Internet2, tell me more....... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Internet2 is what the Internet was originally designed to be: a network for purely for research. It is only available to the member groups, mostly universities and major research corporations. Here's the page to the consortium: Internet2

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."