Slashdot Mirror


Forty Percent of All Email is Spam

PCOL writes "There's an interesting article on spam in today's Washington Post which includes an inside look at AOL's spam control center in Northern Virginia. The story reports that roughly 40 percent of all e-mail traffic in the US is now spam, up from 8 percent in late 2001 and nearly doubling in the past six months; that AOL's spam filters now block 1 billion messages a day; and that spam will cost U.S. organizations more than $10 billion this year from lost productivity and the equipment, software and manpower needed to combat the problem."

9 of 623 comments (clear)

  1. Spammunition by BlackjackGuy · · Score: 5, Informative
    My spam problems have almost entirely gone away since installing Spammunition. It's a bayesian filter for MS Outlook. Wish I didn't have to use MS Outlook but it's a requirement at work.

    Bayesian filters are definitely the way to go. They flat-out *work*. Other programs I've used just didn't perform, like Cloudmark Spamnet.

  2. Re:Take this with a grain of salt by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

    The srticle states that 40% of Internet traffic is Spam

    No, the article states that 40% of email is spam.

    Which, frankly, seems low. But perhaps they're including corporate email, which often sees a much lower spam level.

    I'm still trying to find estimates on how much of all Internet traffic is from SMTP -- I've seen estimates of anything from 5% to 30%.

  3. White list with pass code by Continental+Drift · · Score: 5, Informative
    My Eudora filters allow me to auto-reply to mail coming from someone not already in my address book. The auto-reply tells the writer to try again and put a code word in the subject line, which the filters will then bypass. This is very effective, and since I implemented it, I don't see spam. It is a bit of a pain for people writing to me the first time.

    Now, a white list like this can be bypassed by a spammer claiming to be a friend of mine. It can't claim to be me, because my filters automatically delete anything sent to my address claiming to come from me. I'm wondering if anyone else who has implemented a white list for themselves has seen any problems with it.

  4. Sliding scale by phorm · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this could almost be measured on a sliding scale based on lifetime of an account. Once a user opens a new account - unless the email address is easily guessable or his email provided sells it off - spam volume per real email will be low.
    Then, you get a few friends your email. General email volume increases. You sign up for some server or other and forget to use a protect email... spam starts to drip in.
    A little while later, the drip becomes a trickle as your email gets sold again, and again, and spreads like splitting amoebas.
    Then... a few friends send you e-cards around Christmas, or invite you to some joke sites etc. Not your really gonna get it (I strongly b*tch-out any who e-card me at my work address).

    To top it off, a LUG or whatever you are posting to puts their history on a public website... you start getting picked up by spam-spiders.

    So over time, one will go from maybe 0-5% spam, to 50+% spam. As more people get you in their address books, the more likely it is that somebody will let your email slip to a spam-source. And spam-sources sell your email to other spam-sources... it spreads like wildfire.

    The best way to protect yourself is to use a difficult-to-guess, 9+ character email, for which you never sign up for anything with, and only give to people you trust not to e-card you or have "sniffers" installed on their system which gives away the address book. Using bounce addresses might help also, as you could then switch bounces but still pull from the main email, and then filter the ones that get messy or drop them.

  5. Re:Optimistic by kring · · Score: 5, Informative

    I run a small site (~100 users) and our spam filter, which is designed to be relatively forgiving, catches about 35% of the total messages that are handled by our mail server. 40% seems pretty low to me.

  6. Re:Spam is like TV advertising by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

    Umm, televison advertisements subsidize television programming. Junk mail subsidizes postage. Newspaper ads, radios ads, magazine ads, etc, etc do the same for their respective mediums. How does spam help pay for my internet connection? ABSOLUTELY NOT AT ALL. All it does is increase my ISP's costs on behalf of a freeloading spammer.

  7. 40% is an understatement by Burdell · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just installed an upgraded spam filter server at the ISP I work for, and we are now filtering out almost 70% of inbound mail as spam (with basically zero false positive complaints). We combine Brightmail with the three main MAPS lists (RBL, DUL, and RSS), as well as the basic DNS based checks (for valid domains, etc.) built into the mail server, with Brightmail catching the most by far.

    You can see our mail stats here.

  8. 100%-ish effective spam-prevention technique by UberQwerty · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a real, useable e-mail account that never recieves any spam at all, and I never delete/filter legitimate mail! How is this possible?

    I have two e-mail addresses. One gets nothing but spam, and the other gets no spam at all.

    I have a free account at hotmail.com and a private one on a server that isn't owned by a big business. When I'm giving my address to someone I know personally, I give the private one. When I have to give an e-mail address to sign up for some service or to get some account, or basically whenever I'm giving my e-mail address but I don't know who is getting it, I give my hotmail account.

    Result:
    -My hotmail account occasionally gets confirmation e-mails when I've just created one of those free accounts for some website, but I always know when they're coming. Otherwise, it just collects spam, which I periodically delete (and block the addresses it came from).
    -My personal account never gets spam.

    (I have a university account that forwards to my private account, so occasionally it gets what could be called "spam" that's aimed at univ. students, but if I stop the forwarding it stops the spam, so I don't really have a problem.)

    --


    PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  9. Disposable Email Addresses -- Effective? by angle_slam · · Score: 4, Informative
    Does anyone here use a Disposable email address service? Examples of such services include the following:General information about disposable email addresses can be found in this PC Magazine article and this about.com article.

    Briefly, I'll explain how they work in theory. After signing up with a disposable email service, they give you a disposable email address that you can, for example, enter into forms. Mail sent to that disposable email address gets automatically forwarded to your email account of choice. But here's where they supposedly come in handy. You can sign up for a different disposable email address everytime you fill in a web form. If you start getting spam, you can look at the disposable email address the spam was sent to and you can do 2 things: (1) cancel the disposable email address so you no longer get spam sent to that address; and (2) you know who gave out your disposable address and you can take whatever action you deem appropriate.

    This seems like a cool product, in theory, but I haven't seen anyone with real world experience with these services. If anyone here can describe their experiences, it would be greatly appreciated.