Making a House That Will Last for Centuries?
tcyun asks: "The intro text from kaisyain's review brought up a thought that has been floating around in my head as I am a new home-owner. If one wanted to design a home that would last for hundreds of years, what would one have to do? I, and many of my friends, have recently/ purchased homes. As with all homes, some things are in good shape, others are not. Many items are the fault of initial design, many are due to poor upkeep and repairs. Looking around, it is possible to have a home last for hundreds of years (my family's ancestral home is about 400 years old and there are castles in Europe that are older). If one wanted to build/modify a home, what would one need to do to make sure that the home would still be standing, and usable, hundreds of years from now?" M : Wired suggests going underground.
"A few elements come to mind: structural integrity, usability, reparability, ease of upkeep, physical location (geology and neighborhood), technology, and aesthetics.
- Structural integrity: Rock lasts a long time, but has a variety of draw backs. Concrete (poured or cinder block) foundations are common where I live but wood is still the material used for most of the structure. Should steel cross-beams be considered for parts of the structure? I have heard good things about laminated/engineered wood.
- Technology: Folks on Slashdot have talked about wiring homes with cat-5/7/x and installing empty conduit 'just in case.' Is this really useful with the proliferation of wireless? Would it be more useful if a crawlspace was made available between the ceiling and the attic so that any type of ducting/wiring could be run into a room? Should all rooms have access to a central column through which wiring, plumbing and ducting were run?
- Usability: I have a small house with a small, combined living-family-dining room. I am fairly sure that 50 years ago the designers were not laying out the space to take into account book shelves, a large television, stereo cabinet, gaming consoles, and more in addition to a couch, chair and dining table. Simply making the room larger is one option, but cavernous space is not necessarily good for usability. What would be a good floor plan and how might different sized rooms be distributed to be useful over time for multiple purposes? Would it need a bathroom? (joke)
- Reparability: the previous homeowners made a number of DIY 'improvements' which are nice, until one needs to make a repair. Many items are installed in ways where the only option is to remove entire installations. What types of modular improvements can be made that allow for easy repair/replacement over time as needs change?
- Location: How would one choose where to build a home that would last for hundreds of years? Do you pick an existing neighborhood, space that is at the edge of a town/city or somewhere further out? Does one pick a neighborhood that has been economically/geologically/stable/safe over the longer term even if it is not in great shape at the moment. At first glance, cities in the United States like San Francisco, Detroit, Chicago, Pittsburgh have all gone through 10-20 years spells of nastiness, but have been fairly stable cities at the macro level for a hundred years.
- Aesthetics: Does one simply design/architect and deal with the fact that it will variously become attractive/unattractive over time?
And to complicate matters, how different are the options if one imposes a budget for initial construction (depending on your own idea of what a realistic budget is)."
Got me thinking about L.A. Story "Some of these buildings are over 20 years old."
The house I live in, is only 100 years old this year.
my sig
I'm sure their shelf-life is around 200 years. :-)
You're only going to live, what... a hundred years? Maybe a little more? Screw it. Make a great house that falls apart right when you die. You don't want your deadbeat relatives prospering from your hard work, do ya?!
Since the great wall is packed with the bodies of those that built it (and the pyramids probably have some poor saps crunched in as well), should we assume human skeletons contribute greatly to a structures durability?
-rt
Nothing beats slave labour.
All you'll need is a small room with a hole in the floor, and the three seashells :)
David
I like the way that pratchett puts it when a dwarf talks about his axe. (paraphrasing)
This is the Axe of my ancestors passed down from generation to generation. Sometimes the handle gets worn and a new one is put on, after a while the head will get worn down and a new one gets put on. But it is still the axe of my ancestors.
And since he has a great big bloody axe in his hands are *you* going to argue with him.
get a bunch of slaves,then have them cut some rather large blocks , than have them stack the blocks in some design, probably pyrmidal.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
Step 7: Cultivate the area around the house into a wetland, then make sure every environmentalist in the area is aware that it's there. Then, get the EPA in to declare it a wetland. This is way easier than you might think. It makes it just about impossible for anyone to build anything there ever again.
All the other kings said it were daft to build a castle in a swamp, but I built it anyway! It sank into the swamp. I built another one; it sank into the swamp too. I built a third one; it caught fire, fell over and then sank into the swamp. But the fourth one stayed up! And that's what you'll be getting, my lad - the strongest castle in these islands!
Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
But I have two sad words to add: Formosan Termites. They are in North America and headed north; the frost line didn't seem to stop them
And don't forget about the Mongolian Concrete Borer either.
Much maligned in recent times, a traditional Hovel can last for centuries if properly maintained. In Europe there are some examples well over 500 years old. Most hovels are built into a hedge, thicket or clump of small trees and consist of a single room with no provision for sanitation, and usually without running water or cable TV. Costly ventilation systems are rarely needed as usually the builder would leave large openings for the smoke to escape. Construction materials usually comprise of sticks, mud and a dash of bovine excrement. Very cheap and can usually be habitable in a few hours. Insects can sometimes be a problem, but once a family of rats move in this usually sorts its self out.
- 1920s : 80+ yrs old : expected lifetime = 110 years, expected failure 2030-2040
- 1950s : 50+ yrs old : expected lifetime = 80 years, expected faulure = 2030-2040
- 1970s : 30+ yrs old
:expected lifetime = 50 years, expected failure = 2020-2030
- modern (1990s?) : < 10 yrs old ; expected lifetime = 30 years, expected failure = 2020-2030
So basically, your friend's theory is that all houses will fail around the year 2030. Does he think they run 32bit Unix? Or maybe he is expecting the end of the world around then, and his theory has nothing to do with construction.Extending the theory, we find that houses build in the year 2020 will last 10 years, and houses built in the year 2040 will fall apart before they are finished
In any case, if your friend is still building houses then, he sure is going to be busy!
XML causes global warming.
"All the other kings said it were daft to build a castle in a swamp, but I built it anyway! It sank into the swamp. I built another one; it sank into the swamp too. I built a third one; it caught fire, fell over and then sank into the swamp. But the fourth one stayed up! And that's what you'll be getting, my lad - the strongest castle in these islands!"
Don't be so sure... Castle 4 will probably disappear too. But then, *then* you'll have Castle 5 -
The last best hope for housing!
Kill me now...
My Sig: SEGV
Build your house from diamond, platinium and quartz.
Burry it 200 feet deep and you can be sure it will last forever. It sure will be crap, but who cares about you anyway ?
Make it out of Lego(TM) blocks. Is there really any other way to build?
Sure, it's all fun and games until a herd of cows eats your house.
And the stones! The stones are 50 foot high, 30 foot long, 20 foot deep, and other measurements as well. And the stones are not from round there! That's the amazing thing. I mean, remember, this is B.C. *mumble*. This was before the B.C./A.D. changeover when everyone was going... You didn't have to wind your watch back - you had to get a new bloody watch! As if A.D.'s enough - fuckinell... And the Muslim people going, "A.D? Who's he?" Yes. Good laugh there.
And uh... So, yeah, the stones are from 200 miles away, in Wales. So these guys in Wales were obviously carving the rocks out of the v - very living mountain... "Fantastic, building a henge, are we? That's a fantastic idea. That's a marvelous religion the Druids have got. Yes, got a lot of white clothing, I like that. There we go." And they smash out a huge stone and then they put tree trunks down to roll it along on. "All right, walk it along, here we go, here we go." Buuuhbuuuhuuh. "Help you push 'em along. It's not far, is it?" And the Druids going, "Heave everyone, heave! Well done, everyone, you're doing very well. You'll love it when you see it. I've seen some of the drawings already, it's very special." After 200 miles, "You fucking bastards! You never told it was 200 miles! 200 miles in this day and age - I don't even know where I live now! *sigh* I wish the Christians would hurry up and get here!" And they set all the stones up and the Druids still there tinkering around going, "No that stone and this one - can we swap them around?" So that was the Pagans.
[Courtesy of Eddie Izzard: Dressed to Kill]
For those that would die defending it, Freedom
has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
(font color="Black" face="BumHandwriting")
- Will
(/font)Build Pyramid
For Beer!
(/CardboardSquare)
yea they mixed hemp in with the concrete.
Thats right hemp!
Slightly off the topic of houses, but on-topic as far as lasting a long time - I remember hearing about another of Isambard Kingdom Brunel's bridges. I don't know offhand where it is (was), but apparently it was becoming unsound, so the Royal Corps of Engineers was called in to bring it down. They applied the calculated volume of explosives and hit the switch. The bridge went up and dropped back near enough in the exact same place, strong enough for the Engineers to drive their truck over...
I figure I should see at least three comments about how if it was the US Army blowing up the bridge, that bridge would right now be passing Pluto and heading for deep space...
Anyone who has seen a Tudor or earlier house England knows that the way to make a house last is to throw away the plumb bob and the set square
If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
Depleted uranium? What aisle of home depot is that on? It sounds expensive...
Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!