Looking for Unbiased War News?
AlexisKai asks: "With the forecast for tomorrow being sunny with a 90% chance of airstrikes, the US government will be clamping down on unpatriotic stories and the rest will be self-censored by the major media anyway. Where are Slashdot readers planning to look for reliable, disinterested reports as events in Iraq unfold?"
Fox News, people bitch about it, but there are actual facts presented on there, as opposed to Indymedia or the Nation
09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
Great way to throw a totally unproven topic into a intelligent forum.
Have you any proof of any sites that have been removed by government censorship?
About the only data that I've seen targeted by the government is information that relates to military actions, for the safety of our troops.
I can't believe this even got posted without any proof !
I like their non-liberal bullshit slant on things.
Most of you are activists with a very well defined bias.
Nothing wrong about that unless you pretend it is not true.
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
and sheep for a government
You will struggle to beat the BBC coverage from any other single source, their coverage is extensive and impartial.
BBC News Online.
The BBC World Service is available on both online and RadioWorld-Wide.
BBC News 24 is available on Digital Satellite thought the world.
Could you possibly tell me when it was that George W. Bush was elected to our National Government?
I don't recall it ever happening!
Mob rule by the rich! woo hoo!
"Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
If you want disinterested, you're not gonna find it. Everyone has some interest or another.
If you want good, complete information, watch/read several sources and integrate it yourself; you'll probably be disappointed, since that seems to correlate pretty well with what the major news sources tell you.
If your definition of "unbiased" is "unpatriotic" -- or at least "anti-Allied" -- then why bother with looking for unbiased sources that might screw up your assumptions?