Slashdot Mirror


Wallace and Gromit Game Preview

MBCook writes "Gamers.com has a preview of the game based on the upcoming movie (due in 2005). The preview includes 10 screenshots and some descriptions of game play. The game is expected to be released by the end of the year for the PS2 and the X-Box. The player controls Gromit in an attempt to stop Feathers McGraw from using the inhabitants of the local zoo in his jewel smuggling operations. With levels, like in Sly Cooper, that are designed to be more than a 2D platformer on rails, this looks like a game to look forward to." I've got patent pending on that!

3 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Grommit predates office dog! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wallace and Grommit offical site

    better looking than the developers site which truly looks like the car mechanic's car

    The first wallace and grommit was "a grand day out" about an adventure they went on to get more cheese. Where is the biggest supply of cheese? Hence all the cheese jokes, dear moderators. This came out in 1991, so it is more likely that Microsoft stole the dog image from aardman than vice versa.

    My favourite penguin has always been Opus. And did not the original evil pengiun from Batman, predate Linux? Linux was also created in 1991 another coincidence?

    Like all things, some penguins are good and some are not.

  2. Re:No GameCube version? by iainl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Is the GameCube really that abysmal that it can't handle a platform game?"

    Probably more like "Does the XBox not have anything to compete with our new platformer?"

    The GameCube has Sunshine, and Wario (plus rumours of Mario 128) on its way. The PS2 has Jak 'n' Daxter (considered by some to be better than Sunshine, even). The XBox has Blinx. I know where I'd release my platform title...

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  3. Re:Surprised Hollywood green-lighted long-term pro by j-b0y · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I guess there's a few reasons why Hollywood would want to do this a Wallace and Gromit film:

    • Cheap. The fixed cost is pretty low, and the keeping the animators supplied with clay and film is a lot less expensive than top-earning actors/actresses, huge sfx sequences, expensive sound sets and location shooting.
    • No egos. Nick Park is is one of the most self-effacing multi-Oscar winners you can find. Peter Sallis is not going to throw a fit because his trailer only has one jacuzzi.
    • Infinite Merchandising. The BBC has been (for a state-run organisation) extremely effective at the merchandising thing. And the merchandising opportunities are directly proportional to the imagination of the creators

    I was worried about Chicken Run, as I thought the combination of Mel Gibson and Disney was going to overwhelm the charm and subtlety (and, let's face it, Englishness) of Aardvark's films. As it turned out, Gibson seemed to understand and was completely cool with the Aardvark style; Disney knew when to butt out. Brownie points all round.
    --
    Please remain calm, there is no reason to pani... wait, where are you all going?