Building A Better Inbox (Updated)
vudujava writes "c|net is reporting that a new free (Update: not free, actually, read more for details.), web based email service is opening it's doors today. They promise to deliver "100% spam free" email to their users by using a challenge-response system to all incoming, first-time mail. Catch the entire story here. Although the idea isn't new, it shows that we are notching up the "war on spam"."
Alert reader George Hotelling points out this post on Politech which may give you pause when it comes to the new mail service's Terms of Service.
And kraksmoka writes "As reported on this article on MSNBC : 'Hotmail subscribers are now limited to sending only 100 messages a day "in an effort to prevent spammers from using Hotmail to spread spam," said Lisa Gurry, MSN lead product manager.'"
dlanod writes "In your snippet on the main page you report mailblocks.com as "a new free, web based email service". Looking at Mailblocks' site, it actually costs $9.95/year for the standard service, or $24.95/year for the expanded service with no free option listed (https://app1.mailblocks.com/register.htm)."
This undeclared "war on spam" is unauthorized imperialist aggression!
Seriously, who spams from Hotmail anyway? Don't all the real spammers use custom software with a built-in smtp server? I've gotten enough spams advertising it, after all.
sulli
RTFJ.
Hmmm. No thanks.
You are not the customer.
Web based email service is opening it's doors
That made no sense.
Some people make no sense.
all e-mail lists and or mailings should be OPT-IN. .. then yes .. you are correct, their targeted e-mail is acceptable.
.. from any of the credit industry companies, or from web trolling etc - assume they are gamers, and send them 'targeted' e-mail, then you are no better than the bastards who call me at 8:00 am on a monday morning because they know I bought a lawnmower last month, and *know* i like outdoor power equipment - and want to sell me more.
:
.. '
.. I am denied the simple retaliation of telling someone to go screw.
.. *no* its not the same .. and *no* I don't approve.
if a customer opts in
however, if you just happen to 'get' their e-mail for example
I believe the exact conversation went something like this
Telemarketer: 'Mr Walk, I see here that you recently bought an electric lawn mower at Home Depot, I am authorised to offer you an electric hedge trimmer through my company at a steep discount ! Does that sound interesting to you?'
me: 'I am authorized to remind you that you just woke me the fuck up, that you are to remove me from your calling list, and any calling lists your company uses.'
Telemarketer: 'But Mr. Walk, this is a great deal
me: (interrupting) ' I am *NOW* authorized to tell you to remove me from your calling list, and any calling lists your company uses, and to tell you to 'go fuck yourself' *click*
Now with 'targed' non opted e-mail
So
--Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
Is that all!?
I'll forward this to my grandma toute-suite.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
I haven't tested it extensively, but the algorithm seems solid.
Windows Architecture
Bill? Is that you?
Spammers of the world,
You have 48 hours to cease sending spam and give up. If you fail to stop sending spam after this timeframe, we will remove you from the Internet forcibly and swiftly. We will track you down and destroy your lists. Insecure servers will no longer be regarded as innocent relays, they will be dealt with swiftly and justly as well.
You have 48 hours to comply with this ultimatum. Act responsibly with email and you will reap the benefits. Use spambot and harvesters and our forces will react with force.
-Coalition of Canned Meat
Hammer of Truth