Slashdot Mirror
Build Your Own PCB Milling Machine
mwandel writes "It used to be that one off amateur printed circuit boards were all etched in acid. A lot of companies nowadays use a special form of milling machine to mill them out of solid copper clad circuit boards. This guy Jonathan Westhues built his own PCB milling machine out of various parts, with a laminate trimmer as the milling head. Lots of other neat hacks on his Webpage as well."
More people need to be able to make their own parts out of steel and plastic. The problem is cost. It's curious that a country that is inventive as ours doesn't have some type of affordable CNC(computer numeric computation) milling machine.
Affordable metal cutting lathes are expensive too.
Good article for those that don't already have access to PCB milling equipment. There really is no reason to do the old-school etching method anymore, in fact, I don't even know any hobbyists that do that anymore. Milling equipment can be found, borrowed, or made pretty easily these days. I've even seen a working setup made from Lego Mindstorms and a cordless Dremel! Hey, it works and beats the heck outta the mask-and-acid roll of the dice method.
As one of the members of the younger crowd of which you speak, I'd like to express my own (personal) opinion.
I'm certainly curious, and the multiple articles about home-made tools for dabbling with electronics certainly contribute to my curiosity. The problem, however, is two-fold. One, some of this is rather daunting for most beginners. I see some of the talk about people on here building their own circuitboards and such, and I'm a little intimidated, frankly. Two, I wouldn't know why to dabble in electronics, and the lack of an interesting and simple project just means that I won't get the basics that would let me move on to more advanced projects.
www.nutsandvolts.com certainly looks like an interesting resource, but I'm not sure it's as good for complete newbies such as myself. I'm going to sign up for a sample issue to better evaluate it, but I'm still afraid I'll miss a lot of critical background information.
You zap the moderators with a wand of humor! The moderators resist!
Milling machines are not an overkill or a solution for amateurs, they are a very good solution for inexpensive prototypes or production needed in small-mid volume.
:)
Acid etching produces a functional board, but it simply does not look good, and you can't make 100 boards that are exactly alike. The lines are almost straight, the edges are not perfect, and if you are on a contract to deliver a product, this is not an option. Examples of where a milling machine is one of the best solutions: a university lab where the researchers are under government/industry contract and are supposed to deliver a working prototype or a small business with a military contract (small volume products).
I worked for a startup company for a while, and part of my job was to work on a QuickCircuit milling machine, and that thing had milling bits that were 4 mils thick (comparable to hair). You can hardly reach this precision with acid etching. I also adapted the machine to dice wafers, which replaced the company's practice of using an exactoknife
If you are in the IC design business, testing cheaply is of primary importance. You can get a full setup for producing boards for less than $10K. How's that compared to billions of $$$ for setting up an IC production plant? And if you are in the RF design business, you need the precision so that a crappy board does not screw up your high-frequency measurements.
Of course, milling is no option for producing high-volume PCBs with many layers, but don't think that ASUS spent months to design such a board to test their new motherboard design. First they have to verify that design works, which is done with a cheap PCB design, one that would hook up the ICs. Only after that stage can the final PCB design begin.
As long as the Z80 or 68K processors are still in use, simple PCBs will be here, and we need a cheap and fast way to design and make them.
The most serious problem comes in from the really high-end etching systems. Photoresist is fine with ferric chloride, but when you start using something like an acid-peroxide etchant, it will actually eat many "resist" inks. The resist pens become TOTALLY useless, for example.
And so this is where the old technique of serigraphy comes in. This is the "screen-printing" that makes the name Printed Circuit Boards. The resist ink used on the actual board is usually just some form of lacquer, which holds up well to even the harshest etchants. A stencil is prepared on a screen, usually through a photographic process. Since the screen resist doesn't have to deal with the same harsh chemicals, it is generally much more environmentally conscious and cheaper than PC-Board photoresist.
I actually set up to do this method myself, in a semi-hobby context. I had some previous experience with serigraphy, and the acid/peroxide system was cheaper, far more effective, and much easier to dispose of than the ferric chloride. On the flip-side, it will eat virtually anything metallic and smells aweful (it isn't much of a health hazard except in the sulphuric/peroxide system, but should be ventilated nonetheless), so it's not for the faint of heart.
Hardware, software, and blinking lights!