REST vs. SOAP In Amazon Web Services
Amazon's web services have attracted a thriving community, people are making real money building alternate interfaces to Amazon and collecting Associates commissions on the resulting sales, and there are even tool developers who have come up with the creative business model of agreeing with their users to have some percentage of the transactions use the tool developer's Associates id rather than the site owner's. Cool.
Amazon is holding a free all day web services workshop on April 22 at the O'Reilly Emerging Technologies Conference. The event is open to people not registered at the conference (though space is limited to 50 people).
P.S. Slashdot really ought to have web services as a topic area! Despite being over-hyped, this is a really important area, and there's a lot cooking. Amazon's web services"
It is understandable that Amazon sees most people using REST. They're mostly hobbyists and amateur programmers, and REST is easier and sufficient for the very simple things that you can do via the Amazon web services api, but if one were trying to submit more information -- say a long purchase order -- the limitations of REST would be more apparent. The RPC style of SOAP is often better with REST, but for the document-exchange style, REST is inadequate.