Still More on Global Warming
hype7 writes "The Daily Telegraph is running a piece on the world's temperature. Apparently, it was a lot hotter in the middle ages: "A review of more than 240 scientific studies has shown that today's temperatures are neither the warmest over the past millennium, nor are they producing the most extreme weather - in stark contrast to the claims of the environmentalists.""
I think this whole discussion of global warming hinges on a key presupposition, which is how old is the earth. If you have faith in evolution then you see it being billions of years old, depending on whom you talk to. However if you believe that God created the universe, as recorded in Genisis, then you can conclude the earth is about 7,000 years old. This conclusion can be dirived by the geneologies in the Bible. If the earth is only 7,000 years old then the environmental changes of the 1900's are not that drastic. However if these changes are compared to the believed temperatures of the earth for billions of years it is a scary thing. So like most discusssions, it comes back to orgins. Do you have faith in the word of God, or you evolution and own limited autonomy.
Junkscience.com is nothing but a republican propaganda outfit. When you make a reference to them you display your bias.
War is necrophilia.