Windows Media Format Could Hit Linux-Based Devices
An anonymous reader writes "LinuxDevices.com reports that Microsoft has licensed InterVideo Inc. to supply Windows Media Technology to makers of Linux-based consumer devices. Under the agreement, InterVideo is licensed to take the components of the Windows Media Format, port them to Linux, and provide them to manufacturers who are interested in running Windows Media Technology on Linux-based consumer devices such as set-top boxes, personal video recorders, and other hybrid multimedia devices."
so now will the movie theaters run linux?
moo.
April 1st was 6 days ago.
manufacturers who are interested in running Windows Media Technology on Linux-based consumer devices
Wow.. they must have a huge* target audience with this one...
*Please excuse the incorrect use of the word "huge" in the above sentence. To read correctly, replace "huge" with "non existant"
Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
Then don't post AC and somebody might answer.
Laws are for people with no friends.
they can't open source thier application because there are too many hardcoded references to ads.
"Then don't post AC and somebody might answer."
;)
I'm not AC. AC's don't have user numbers, signatures, post at +2, or spell Anonymous with a V.
Oops I bet you're surprised you got a response.
Are they ethically obligated to set the evil bit on?
I know... It was funny a week ago...
As in... performance hit?
What porn sites do you visit that require Windows proprietary media format?
-------
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
-- George Orwell
"It's evil! Don't touch it!"
With apologies to those responsible for Time Bandits
Why should we trust Microsoft to do anything for us at this point? They've already stated that their goal is to eradicate Linux, and they've already started lobbying against the entire idea of the GPL. They'd make this kind of thing illegal in a heartbeat, if they could.
What we really need is someone on the inside, someone to release the specs for how their version is to be implemented, without releasing the exact implementation. This way, we can build workalikes and not have to deal with Microsoft directly.
IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
That's odd ... I've been doing that for years. (Whoops ... did I really post that with my user account?)