Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Analysis of RIAA vs Princeton Student

Posted by timothy on from the dan-peng's-empire-of-evil dept.

An anonymous reader submits: "Joe Barillari, a computer science student studying under Prof. Ed Felten, posted an analysis on his blog of the lawsuit filed by the RIAA against a Princeton college student for running "Napster-like" networks. He argues that the case doesn't quite live up to its contributory infringement claim due to limitations in the DMCA. A good read!"

3 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Whew! by incom · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can finally load up kazaa again without worrying about being sued into the stone age. Eat me metallica!

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  2. A good read! Must be so! by djupedal · · Score: 0, Troll

    Where is the filter for only displaying "great" or "fantastic" reads? Do not bother me with simple 'good' reads, ok?

    You have no idea what I consider to be good or bad when it comes to reading, so don't try to convince me you are anything but a copy boy.

    ....this whole read quotient blathering by editors has been going on for ages, and it still reaks of lazy.

  3. Re:Moderators? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Troll

    You must be one of those scumbags who moderated my original comment as "overrated". I just hope you are erroneously sued by a greedy croporation, just like the filthy sockpuppet you are deserves.