Slashdot Mirror


Sun Launches Instant Messaging Server

theIG writes "According to this article at geek.com, and another one at InternetWeek, Sun has shipped the first part of its new enterprise collaboration platform to compete with Exchange and Domino. Dubbed 'Sun ONE Instant Messaging 6.0,' this server will work with other products to be released in May, to allow a single login for all of its services that allow connections from outside a corporate firewall." Instant messaging is becoming increasingly popular in the workplace. Local messaging servers like this were only the next logical step for businesses which don't wish to rely on an outside network for their messaging.

12 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. What's Wrong with Jabber? by redcliffe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can run your own Jabber server, and it can also message other Jabber users. Some of the clients support encryption too.

    1. Re:What's Wrong with Jabber? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 5, Informative
      Jabber doesn't integrate with sun's other enterprise utility servers.


      The platform, which consists of several separate server packages -- Sun ONE Messaging Server, Sun ONE Instant Messaging, Sun ONE Portal, Sun ONE Calendar Server, and Sun ONE Identity Server -- is available now and takes aim at rivals Microsoft and IBM/Lotus in the lucrative collaboration arena, said David Ferris, analyst with Ferris Research.


      It's like wanting jabber to integrate with yahoo mail and yahoo calendar, along with the privacy.

      Not to slam jabber at all, just the right tool for the right job, eh? Just one that requirs sun software :)
      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    2. Re:What's Wrong with Jabber? by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Insightful


      It's like wanting jabber to integrate with yahoo mail and yahoo calendar, along with the privacy.

      Not to slam jabber at all, just the right tool for the right job, eh? Just one that requirs sun software :)


      Why not? Jabber is *not* an instant messaging protocol. It just happens to be useful for instant messaging ;-)

      Jabber is a protocol for streaming XML. In this paradigm, why NOT use it as a transport for all sorts of other services, such as calendar information, etc.?

      Ok, now for the privacy portion-- authentication and encrtyption are both supported by many Jabber clients and it would not be hard to impliment an X509-based encryption structure along with a directory service (AD, NDS, OpenLDAP, etc).

      The problem is not with Jabber. It is with the fact that there are no open-source enterprise groupware servers to compete with Exchange. I really wish Sun would take the lead with open standards, but they have not because I am sure they want to create lockin.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  2. irc? by terminal96 · · Score: 4, Informative

    we have a company irc server where i work. works well enough.

  3. Re:It doesn't matter... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That hardly matters for corporate users, at whom this product is aimed. The idea is that employees use it mainly for interoffice messaging, not yapping all day to their pals.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  4. Re:Jabber by wirefarm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The appeal to me is that Jabber is an open standard with well thought out open protocols. Anyone can write their own Jabber client in any language. Same for interfaces.

    There are libraries that let you write integration code for any program you have. Search CPAN for Jabber and you'll see what I mean.

    Can I interface Sun's product with my company's homebrew scheduling system and the online shop I wrote? I know that I can with Jabber.

    Jim

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  5. We need Open messaging by Organic_Info · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "for businesses which don't wish to rely on an outside network for their messaging"

    They may not wish to rely on outside systems for internal communication but connections to outside IM systems may be essential. I won't lie I've not read the link yet. But my first though is how it would interact with other messaging systems.

    The current biggies AIM, MSN, ICQ and Yahoo are no good as fragmented seperates - think back to BBS systems. Until they all sit down and decide to play together and use an Open standard it's not going to be as usefull as it could be. Untill then people will use what ever "frigs" they can to get them to interoperate such as Trillian (recommned the pro version by the way) or Jabbers connections.

    Of course being HW focused if Sun push for an Open messaging standard touting their HW to power it all we could see some action but unfortunately they are a bit late in the game to weild that sort of power.

    IM should interoperate and be as widespread as e-mail but it won't while everyone diggs in and backs their own standard.
    .

    --
    "Things that you own end up owning you" - Tyler Durden (via Diogenes of Sinope).
  6. Market is wide open by LinuxXPHybrid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > ... frankly it's too late for a new entry.

    I read many comments like yours on Slashdot, and I can understand why you say that. For typical slashdotters, yes, Sun's announcement feels like too late. If you live in a major city in US or its metropolitan area, perhaps that's how you feel. If you work in the IT industry, more so. But the reality is that we are still at the beginning of the information age. I truly feel that the market is wide open.

    If you look beyond US metropolitan area (and other, what they call, developed countries), there is a huge opportunity. There does not seem to be a wide margin in the IT industry in US, but there is China. There's large part of EU. Potentially, Middle East, now that Iraq war is pretty much over. Just that... it's over 5 times bigger that the whole US. Market is wide open.

    In addition, Sun does have competitive edge over Exchange and Domino. The fact is that MS is stuck in the world of 32 bit. They say IA-64 is coming, but even if it arrives tomorrow, how long do they take to make it really functional AND get support from other ISVs? Domino is a competitive product, but Sun is really kicking IBM's ass in high end because of its quality, openness, and price.

    I am not a marketing analyst and I cannot or dear not predict the future, BUT I do say that "... it's too late" sounds a little premature.

  7. Real insightful, CowboyNeal by p3d0 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Instant messaging is becoming increasingly popular in the workplace. Local messaging servers like this were only the next logical step for businesses which don't wish to rely on an outside network for their messaging.
    Yeah, it was the next logical step several years ago. IBM has been using the Sametime IM internally for as long as I have worked there.
    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  8. Re:Sun and version by bmetzler · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Someone needs to smack the marketroids at Sun upside the head with the news that version numbers aren't just there because they make a pretty sound when you say them, they're meant to convey information to the customer.

    Um, hello? That's exactly why this version number is 6.0. It's because it's not just a pretty sound when you say it, it is because it is meant to convey the concept that this IM product is meant to integrate with the SunONE platform, which, coincidentaly, has a version 6 label. Wild, isn't it?

    -Brent
  9. Re:Jabber's interface sucks by tzanger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I went through practically every Linux client I could find before finding one that I was happy with. Psi is a Qt-based client that acts and feels very much like the original ICQ client. No ads, sidebars, topbars, navbars, barbars... just a regular clean and simple IM client. There is an extensive client list for Win32, Linux and MacOSX which lists the features of each. Psi works on all three, which is another reason I chose it. That, and the fact that, at the time, it was the only NON-Gtk client that looked half assed presentable and the ONLY Linux client that didn't take up a lot of screen real estate, and the ONLY Linux client that did NOT pop up the incoming message, stealing focus from whatever I was typing into.

    Psi's Jabber client lib (and ssl comms) have been adopted by KDE for their IM clients too, which is a nice bonus.

  10. Domino? Please by tmasssey · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I cringe every time I hear something like this being compared with Domino. Yes, Domino does e-mail. Yes, Domino does calendaring. But Domino is so much, much more.

    Anyone who has ever used Domino's document management tools or developed an application for Notes knows exactly what I mean. You have the ability to develop highly advanced applications, not just folders full of sticky notes (e.g. Exchange). You don't have filing cabinets full of sticky notes, do you? Why should your database?

    The biggest disadvantage of Domino is the fact that developing for it is kind of its own little world. I'm looking forward to Domino R7's integration with WebSphere. But even until then, Domino gives you a document management development environment second to none.

    The weird thing is that the feature that everyone looks at Domino most closely for, e-mail, is its weakest point. That's what comes from building e-mail around a document-mangement platform, instead of building document management around an e-mail platform.