Building ATA RAID and SMP Support into Slackware 9
TheMadPenguin writes "This HOWTO will describe the steps necessary to build support into Slackware Linux 9.0 for
Symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) and a Promise Ultra ATA RAID redundant drive array. By default, there is no support for these configurations unless specified through a kernel recompilation after the initial install."
If you choose to run Slackware, wouldn't you know how to do this?
:-P
There are so many people that wanna run Linux and heard that slack is the coolest and most "pro" way to do it. Sickens me.
Ciryon
Building ATA RAID and SMP Support into Your Kernel
Those complaints asside, the guy knows what he's doing, so if you want to run RAID or SMP on your kernel, give it a read.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
From the office of Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf (aka Baghdad Bob):
"Symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) and a Promise Ultra ATA RAID redundant drive arrays in Linux do not exist! It is a trick by the coalition forces!"
More at 11.
Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.
As I see it there is nothing drastically different with Slack to require a Slack specific HOWTO.
l
This only complicates things more.
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Kernel-HOWTO.htm
Would have sufficed,
Adrian
It's 7:08 PM.
9 minues
It is easier/better/more difficut BUT more rewarding in Gentoo.
it's news because it is new (Posted on Saturday, April 12 @ 18:31:18 EDT ).
that said, like the original poster, if you're running slack you should know how to add stuff like this without reading a howto.
though maybe it saves few minutes for some people.. and gives distribution ranters some online time.
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
all you need is to have the OS recognize and support the RAID controller. Actual RAID array building and configuring is a manual hardware task...
------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
OK, how about this for an idea. With Linux, support for most devices is already built in, and either "just works" or needs a recompile. How about, then, a set of diffs for different devices that you can apply to your /boot/config file to enable support? This way, people won't have to look up the HOWTOs and edit the file manually, but either get the diff direct from the Linux-savvy manufacturer or go to an unoffical webpage (like this one) and get it from there?
So first you look up your device, then you apply the diff to your config file, then you recompile, then your device works.
Am I missing out on anything? This would be very handy, and significantly reduce possibilities for manual-editing-screwups.
They really do not exist! Our valiant troops destroyed SMP support along with hundreds of the American criminals. Today alone we destroyed over 500 American tanks and over 40 of the evil zionist kernel modules.
Former Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf
. . . if my Mom has to recompile the kernel just to get symmetric multiprocessing support and a working ATA raid array for chrissake??!!!
-----
Believe me, I'm as surprised by my comment as you are.
It's better to use Slackware's kernel-source-2.4.20-noarch-5.tgz package, since it already contains patches for some ext3 bugs as well as the recent ptrace exploit.
If you do use the original 2.4.20 tarball in the source/k directory, you will need to apply the linux-2.4.20.ptrace.diff.gz that you'll find in the same directory, and if you use ext3, you'll also want to apply the patches from the ext3-patches directory.
Mind you, Linux is a fairly complicated OS to manage and maintain. Trying to use and maintain Linux simply requires quite a bit of understanding on how it works as nearly everyone knows. Trying to use Linux without reading up on basic things (like kernel recompiles) and understandin them is like driving a car without experience or a license.
The "Everyone should be able to do everything" idea is what's wrong with computers in general these days. No, John Doe does NOT need to set up an IIS webserver that came with his pirated Windows XP Pro CD. Keep things simple for users instead. Easier for them to understand and easier for professionals to maintain. (Even though I know "professionals" who should be banned from using computers, ugh.)
Hate me!
Slackware was the easy distribution!
Lol, how far things have come.
EXTRAVERSION = -smp_raid
Then you'll have two entries under
I've used Linux for about 6 years, and although I'm no guru, I've gone through many installs of every major distro on quite a few different machines. This time, upgrading from Slack 8.1, I got bad vibes from the start. The installer flaked out on me during partition setup, having to get the kernel sources separately is annoying (particularly since I have to have them to install Nvidia drivers) and overall I got the feeling that the whole thing was just slapped together. This is disapointing since the creator of Slackware went to the same college I did. (Go Dragons)
./configure, chasing down libraries, fixing compiler errors, and such in order to setup programs. I like being able to download a program and just click the bastard to run. I do seriously hope that along with the 2.6 kernel and a more desktop-friendly outlook, more developers will make thier programs more friendly to install for the average joe.
So I downloaded Mandrake 9.1, installed it, and I haven't had a problem.
Since I'm ranting about ease of use anyway, and maybe using my Imac is starting to jade me, but I'm getting tired of running
Nikkos
And in other news: Today, April 12th, is cosmonauts day, Yuri Gagarin was the first man in space in 1961.
Again, for the billionth time, folks, /usr/src/linux IS NOT supposed to be a symlink to the current kernel sources.
/usr/src/linux SHOULD link to the kernel headers in place when glibc was compiled.
/usr/src/linux-2.5.25
/usr/src/linux-2.2.19
/usr/src/linux->linux-2.2.19
Therefore you may safely have
uname -r
Linux 2.5.25
-jpeg
This HOWTO will describe the steps necessary to build support into Slackware Linux 9.0 for [...] RAID redundant drive array.
...or even a RAID redundant independent drive array, or a RAID redundant array of independent (or inexpensive) drives (or disks). Hey, that's getting a little long...maybe an acronym would be useful here. How about: RAID RAID!
Tune in next week when the poster describes how to set up NIC Cards on your PC Computer using only OSS Software from the FSF Foundation.