Pew Internet Project Study on Internet Non-Users
cheezitmike writes "The Pew Internet and American Life Project released a new study on the digital divide and the declining growth of the Internet: "Pew Internet Project tracking data show a flattening of the overall growth of the Internet population since late 2001. Internet penetration rates have hovered between 57% and 61% since October 2001, rather than pursuing the steady climb that they had showed in prior years." You can also just read their short summary of findings or stories about the study in The Washington Post and The New York Times (free reg.)."
For no reg, move every sed!
y /c ircuits/17shun.html
sed -e "s/www/archive/"
http://archive.nytimes.com/2003/04/17/technolog
Bah weep granah, weep ninny bong!
The study shows:
Not the bubble burst per se. Apparently, lots of social factors come into play, which I think were not into the equation on the prediction years ago.
--
Error 500: Internal sig error
Anecdotal evidence means nothing. Your grandmother aside, there is a huge tech gap between those over 50 and those under 50. 71% of the people who said they would never go online are over 50. Only 6% of 18-29 year olds said they will never go online.
I would also point out that 99.999% of the elderly did not invent the computer, television, modern radio, etc. The 0.001% that did I am pretty sure are either dead or online.
It's interesting to note that these people were literate, but classified in the lowest ranking on the scale.
Get the facts:
Illiteracy rates. By 1979, it was down to .6%
US 4th Graders outscore most other countries.
Executive summary of the 1995 National Adult Literacy Survey (the most recent one; also linked to above).
Does this mean there's no room for improvement? Of course not. But does it mean we should publish false statistics, proclaim ourselves as failures, and give a poor impression of ourselves to the rest of the world? The US is not in as bad a shape as so many seem to believe, and things are improving, not worsening (see the illiteracy trends page above).