Slashdot Mirror


FTC vs Spammers

binaryDigit writes "The San Jose Mercury News has an article on the FTC getting ready to take action on an (alleged) spammer. 'The Federal Trade Commission said today that after receiving about 46,000 complaints it had asked a federal judge to halt the operation.' Too bad it took 46000 complaints to prompt some action, but at least some action is being taken. The FTC will focus on the "deception" involved (innocent and misleading subject lines, bogus (but real) from/reply to addresses, etc)."

10 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory Bayesian Filtering Plug by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is the obligatory SPAM thread plug for bayesian filtering.

    If you're not already doing it, give it a go in one of its many forms.

    I've been using POPFile for ages and it works a treat.

  2. How did the complaints come in? by Elvisisdead · · Score: 4, Informative

    Possibly uce@ftc.gov? That's the address I've been sending them to.

    --

    "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
  3. Forward your spam to the FTC by travdaddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    A slashdot article FTC Encourages Consumers to Forward Them Spam was posted on September 7, 2002 stating that the FTC wanted people to forward them spam at uce@ftc.gov.

    --
    Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
  4. actual ftc site by ih8apple · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the actual FTC announcement...

  5. Re:bogus but... by bpfinn · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm a bit confused about how these addresses were both "bogus (but real)?" Would someone like to clarify the author's intent with this comment?

    I think that the author means that the "From" address was a real, working email address. It just didn't happen to belong to the spammer. I believe this is called getting "Joe-Jobbed".

  6. Re:The FTC? What a Joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Au contraire..

    FTC privacy regulations are being accused of being too hard to follow for website operators! Aren't Slashfolk for _more_ privacy?

    FTC apparently is doing a pretty good job overall..

    Excerpts from recent Wall Street Journal article:
    (April 4th 2003 by John Wilke)
    "Devout Reaganite Becomes
    An Unlikely Enforcer at FTC"
    "Indeed, of the few federal regulatory agencies that really matter, his stands out because it's functioning vigorously: The Federal Communications Commission is nearly paralyzed, with board members in open revolt against the chairman; Harvey Pitt went down in flames at the Securities and Exchange Commission; and the Justice Department antitrust chief, Charles James, resigned amid criticism that he was a reluctant enforcer who caved on the Microsoft Corp. case.

    Mr. Muris, unexpectedly, has become an aggressive enforcer. He's filed lawsuits against drug makers for cutting cozy deals with rivals and moved to promote competition where it is lacking in the health-care business, by investigating hospital mergers and alleged price fixing by doctors' groups. He has clipped attorneys' fees in class-action cases and told lawyers they aren't needed to close real-estate transactions. He has scolded funeral directors for banning online casket sales and targeted state rules used to restrict the sale of wine on the Internet. He has forced Microsoft to drop plans to harvest consumer data from its software, and in antitrust -- despite predictions that he'd be a soft touch for business -- he has challenged mergers in markets from ice cream to pickles.

    Mr. Muris's most visible public legacy may be a federal "do not call" system to protect Americans from telemarketers, which he pushed through despite resistance from his own party in Congress. The system could be in operation as soon as this summer, allowing consumers an easy way to shield themselves from dinnertime calls from telemarketers." ...
    "Most votes on the agency's five-member board are now unanimous. "We're the only game in town right now, where government is actually looking out for consumers," says Mozelle Thompson, a Democratic commissioner and early Muris critic who is now an ally."

    On dealing with spam:
    "Mr. Muris dropped that tack and instead boosted law-enforcement resources by 50%, and began prosecuting more identity-theft and fraud cases. He targeted unwanted e-mail by filing charges against hundreds of deceptive spammers. And he delighted in showing visitors "the refrigerator," a large data-storage unit deep in the FTC's granite headquarters where the nastiest forms of spam are stored and studied by FTC sleuths.

    Consumer advocates say the FTC hasn't gone far enough to stem the rising tide of junk e-mail. "We're disappointed they haven't done more," said James Love, director of the Consumer Project on Technology, a Ralph Nader-affiliated nonprofit. He specifically criticizes Mr. Muris's decision not to seek new laws to restrict spammers."

    WOAH.. the FTC commissioner wants to use existing laws instead of passing new fun filled blanket laws?

  7. May slashdot have mercy on his soul... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    whois.networksolutions.com
    Registrant:
    Westby, Brian D. (PORNSEEKER2-DOM)
    1752 S. 5th St.
    SAINT CHARLES
    MO,63303
    US

    Domain Name: PORNSEEKER.NET

    Administrative Contact:
    Westby, Brian (BW11618) bryanwestby@WORLDNET.ATT.NET
    Westby, Brian D.
    1752 S. 5th St.
    SAINT CHARLES , MO 63303
    3149161554
    Technical Contact:
    ValueWeb (HOS237-ORG) hostmaster@VALUEWEB.NET
    ValueWeb
    3250 West Commercial Blvd. #200
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
    US
    954-334-8000 fax: 954-334-8001

    Record expires on 24-Aug-2005.
    Record created on 24-Aug-1999.
    Database last updated on 4-Jan-2003 04:28:55 EST.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS1.CALIFORNIA.NET 216.131.95.20
    NS1.OAKWEB.COM 216.131.94.5

  8. New SPAMmer to abuse by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

    Feel free to make this guys life hell. I've received over 100 of his mortgage offers in the past two weeks and asking to be removed from his mailing list has done no good.

    Here is the raw output for domain n0hastlem0rtgage.com:

    Organization:
    none
    Mike Stone
    12345 Stone rd
    Stoneville, CA 92504
    US
    Phone: 916.123.4567
    Email: vialead@yahoo.com

    Amazingly enough, his yahoo account has already been terminated.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  9. Re:Spamassassin and recent false-negatives by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bayesian WOULD help you.

    The Bayes filter would decide that since it had a short subject line, it wasn't coming from someone you know (names on whitelist are always non-spam), and it contains IMG SRC but no other POSITIVE hits, it's would score VERY likely spam on a properly trained filter.

    The only problem you may have is if your mother regularly sends you pictures of her dog with a subject line like Here.

    HTML email by itself scores very high on probability for spam, because very few people besides spammers use it. Those people are generally vetted by their other content.

  10. Robert Soloway - Big SPAMMER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative



    Please call 888-340-9733 and ask about the special on Penis Enlargers or Boob Enhancers. He (Robert) has great offers ; /

    He also sells SPAMWARE as well. He will be happy to hear from inquiring customers ; >

    Please check out :

    Info on Soloway


    Please send Catalogs to:


    Business Addr:

    279 Granite St.
    Ashland OR

    Alleged Home Addr:

    1547 Upland Place
    Medford Or 97501


    Remember, waste SPAMMER's time & money like they waste our's.