Should You Hire a Hacker?
fabioj writes "Business Week has an article about today's debate at the RSA Security Conference held at the Moscone Center attended by Kevin Mitnick and his 1995 trial prosecutor, Christopher Painter. Interesting to note that Painter doesn't see Kevin Mitnick's experiences as a deterrent for the 'up-and-coming technology workforce' to criminally hack."
$5 / month hosted VPS on linux = awesome!
What!? And miss out on that one-on-one attention?
Let it be known across the lands that this man has said loudly what we all have feared! Hacking is like having sex with kids! Beware! Begone!
I don't know if I should hire a hacker but I do know that Slashdot should hire a copy editor.
My
Limekiller
This isn't a repeat of the earlier /. post. That one linked to security focus and this one links to business week. But the business week article is just a reprint of the security focus article...
I for one as a honest person am tired of hearing about this frickin criminal! Yes! Criminal!
Sounds like this Mitnick guy is management material. Criminal action shows initiative. It shows that he will do what it takes to get ahead.
Most of our society looks at the criminal as a superior form of being not tied to the conventionalities of the honest man (ie peasant). But there is a big problem with that getting caught thing. If he was a criminal who hadn't been caught...well, there is there is no end to how far he could go in the American corporate structure.
Who knows, he could have been CEO? I suspect most CEOs have done far worse things than Kevin Mittnick on their back stabbing drives for power. Unfortunately, there is a gentleman's agreement on being caught, tried and covicted.
Hiring a felon might get people looking closer at what companies actually do, and how the insiders funnel off profits. It would be far too risky to hire the man.