Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The NSA Gives Their Two Cents On Securing XP/2K/NT

Posted by timothy on from the plus-inflation dept.

caino59 writes "Thier site is already slow, and must be taking a hit, but the NSA has released several guides on Securing Windows XP, Windows 2000, and Windows NT. Now go out and download the guides, and /. the NSA!"

4 of 36 comments (clear)

  1. Windows Server? by mhesseltine · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Maybe the NSA secured their Windows server, causing it to slow down?

    OT, can we "please" modify the /. setup on repeat postings? 2 minutes between postings on any 1 story = OK. 2 minutes between postings on different stories != OK.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:Windows Server? by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      2 minutes between postings on any 1 story = OK. 2 minutes between postings on different stories != OK.

      Yeah, no shit. I mean, when someone goes to pick up their messages from the message system, they usually reply to all their replies all at once. I guess Taco et al must type about 5 wpm so he doesn't notice how obnoxious the system is.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  2. Required Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia Windows Secures You!

  3. *BSD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dying