Slashdot Mirror


Phone Companies Bill Public for Nonexistent Equipment

Srinivasan Ramakrishnan writes "Forbes has an eye-opening article on the scam that lets the Bells scoop $5 billion every year from the consumer with the sanction of the FCC. The FCC Line charge that appears on every phone bill is a vestige of a deal that was struck by the FCC with the Bells. The deal was touted by the FCC as a historic win that saved $3.2 Billion a year for the consumer - Forbes takes a closer look at the deal."

6 of 449 comments (clear)

  1. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    FP by the AC!!

  2. moron Godless softwar gangsters billing everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    for non-functional 'services'.

    this is what you want US to look like to the rest of the wwworld? yuk.

  3. Re:Nationalize local phone access! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Umm. They tried that. The whole "not allowed to own your phone" period in our great telecom history.

    The only thing worse than private ownership is public ownership.

  4. A tired industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Any time there is nickel-and-diming in an enterprise, you know that industry is past its peak. For example, the telephone and airlines industries.

  5. Re:Nationalize local phone access! by bluprint · · Score: -1, Troll

    The USPS is subsidized with tax dollars. I would prefer that only people who use a thing, pay for that thing, and to the degree by which it is used. Perhaps instead of sending a letter, I'll use email, or get direct withdrawals instead of mailing bills, etc. As it stands, I pay a certain amount (through taxes) for the USPS wether I use it or not...

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
  6. Re:Saddam Hussein sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    hey dude.. stop being an asshole. This is about telcos overcharging.. not about why saddam sucks ass. but your too lame to understand that from your previous comments... what a troll