MIT Gnome Invasion
J. Arthur Random writes "On Wednesday, April 23, hundreds of gnomes invaded the main public computer cluster at MIT. There were big gnomes, little gnomes, even naked gnomes. A gnome army carried the GNOME banner. Fortunately, the ACME Gnome Exterminators took care of the infestation within a few days."
fp?
primeiro post caralho.
slashdot cares about fluff like this, but not that the father of relational databases passed away.
2003-04-26 00:59:52 Father of the Relational Database, Ted Codd, dead (articles,storage) (rejected)
the register story here
flood your submission queues until they get the idea that we care about the death of computer science pioneers as much as porcelain gnomes placed around campus. geez.
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
slashdot editors care about fluff like this, but not that the father of relational databases passed away.
2003-04-26 00:59:52 Father of the Relational Database, Ted Codd, dead (articles,storage) (rejected)
the register story here
flood your submission queues until they get the idea that we care about the death of computer science pioneers as much as porcelain gnomes placed around campus. geez.
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Certainly not Slashdot, which is based on MySQL.
slashdot editors care about fluff like this, but not that the father of relational databases passed away.
2003-04-26 00:59:52 Father of the Relational Database, Ted Codd, dead (articles,storage) (rejected)
the register story here
flood your submission queues until they get the idea that we care about the death of computer science pioneers as much as porcelain gnomes placed around campus. geez.
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
can you help?
ted codd, relational database father, computer science pioneer, passed away.
slashdot rejected my story about this at the same time this one got posted.
i find that incongruous. maybe they will listen to you if you or anyone who reads this comment posts the story instead.
the story is here
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
well, i don't care about my personal story ego. i have had plenty rejected just like you. no big deal.
but when a pioneer in computer science passes away, and A story- not MY story, on the subject gets rejected by slashdot at the same time they post a story about plastic gnomes on campus, i got angry.
i don't care about my story getting rejected. i care about the story getting rejected at all.
compare the news of his passing to the news of plastic gnomes.
see the source of my feeling miffed?
i just want SOMEONE to get the story posted, it does not have to have anything to do with me at all.
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Parent forgot to put http:// in the URL, resulting in a broken link, but still gets modded up +5 informative. Says a lot about mods, doesn't it? :-)
Many people attempt to raise awareness of topics which are important to them by posting articles to Slashdot. Many true (non-fiction) articles are submitted each day, and then some clown posts fiction about a gnome, and it gets accepted as an official article. GAH, I say GAH! Then I say GOO GOO GAH GAH! Now, I say WAAH-HAH-HAH-WAAH! I want my bah-bah.