Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Electricity Set to Power Village

freedommatters writes "The UK Sunday Times has a story today about how "Scientists have successfully applied the technology used in microwave ovens to beam electricity without the need for unsightly pylons and overhead cables." A prototype has illuminated a handful of light bulbs and they expect to be able to power a remote village within three years."

8 of 373 comments (clear)

  1. Dangers? by Eight+01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I assume the microwave beam would have to be highly focused in order to work. What safegaurds are there to make sure nothing gets in the way of the beam?

    (the article is unavailable without a $55 subscription, maybe it is spelled out in the article?)

  2. Can anyone explain the economics of .... by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Can anyone explain the economics of the current line/poll implementation?

    Why aren't lines buried to be less obtrusive, better insulated, and non-problematic in ice storms?

    Recently, in February, South Carolina, my home state, had a very bad ice storm. It was called "the worst on record". Why was it called that? It wasn't really the worst. Duke Power, our service provider, has failed to maintain the lines in there above ground condition. Lots of trees had grown through power even over and around some lines. Then there was the typical stupid driver who ran into a number of poles all over the area.

    I was without power for 4 days. Luckily, I had an UPS unit from a server that has 40 hours and I use a laptop as my main computer. It powered everything in my place including a small heater for a while.

    To be on topic, eventhough the above is too: I don't think we should be pushing conventional power to 3rd world countries. With this implementation of "beaming power" - power still has to be generated at a plant with with most likely a non renewable resource. Why can't we give these same people advanced windmills and solar cells? (Then teach them maintenance) That makes so much more sense. I see the costs of even an experiment; very high. Also, I think Microwaves at a ground level would interfere with radio communications at the points below the transmission.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  3. Re:Interesting, but... by UWC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been modded Troll? Come on, people that work around microwave antennas do have higher incidences of cancers. The cooking properties of microwaves were discovered by accident.

    It's a genuine concern, and I was just addressing it rather light-heartedly. I've done science fair projects on EMF effects on plants, and I have observed differences in growth patterns; there is an observable effect on biological systems. The risks are real, and there should be more study before they start beaming out microwaves that can power homes.

  4. Interesting, but dangerous? by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tesla was pushing "broadcast power". It was doomed to failure because of the problems inherent in charging the atmosphere. What they are proposing here is quite different. Haven't read the article, but I'm slightly familiar with the concept here. You simply convert electricity into microwave radiation and transmit it in a tight beam to a receiving station. No problem, old hat. Doing it on this scale might be a challenge, though. On the other end you have a receiver that converts that radiation back to usable electricity. Quite a different problem. I suspect that's what they're pioneering here. I think it has actually been done before, but not in any practical way. Powering a few lightbulbs isn't exactly practical either, but it would be if you could power a small town, or even just several buildings.

    But keep out of the way of the beam!! I have to wonder about the environmental damage of birds/insects flying through it and getting cooked.

    I remember reading about a proposal to send power to the earth this way. By having a massive solar cell array in space transmitting microwaves to a giant receiver on earth, you could gather lots of energy. The thought of this thing getting off track and aiming at, say, NYC seems a little too scary, though.

    1. Re:Interesting, but dangerous? by deglr6328 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      score 4 insightful? I don't know who's more clueless, the poster or the moderators. I swear the quickest way to spot a conspiracy theorist moron on slashdot is to look for a post saying essentially that 'no it wasn't unfeasible schemes due to the laws of physics, it was the power companies and the MAN who kept him down!!' or some such.
      Please get a clue. The reason it was impossible is becasue of the inverse square law of radiating electromagnetic radiation. In other words if you double your distance from the power generating station you will only recieve 1/4th the power (for non directed beams, which Tesla's station was) using the same power gathering area(antenna size). You would have to generate unbelieveably intense EM fields at the transmission station just to light a light bulb a mile away! It would be so wasteful a means of power transmission that a mere few percent at most of the generated electricity would ever be used by the customer.
      By the way your other non-sequitor comment about the "Tunduska" (sic. Tunguska) event belies your ignorance as well, everyone knows by now that it almost certainly was either a comet or asteroid.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  5. Re:Tesla's Legacy by Tomato3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The scientific man does not aim at an immediate result. He does not expect that his advanced ideas will be readily taken up. His work is like that of the planter - for the future. His duty is to lay the foundation for those who are to come, and point the way."
    -Nikola Tesla

    --
    Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Commissioner Lal
  6. Could you cite your source? by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Come on, people that work around microwave antennas do have higher incidences of cancers.

    I am aware of cancer clusters around some high voltage power lines that was traced to chemical compounds (used in the insulators, IIRC), but no responsible studies that link microwave antennas to cancer. (I use the qualification "responsible" because I have seen "studies" by the cell-phones-are-killing-us wackos that make the claim, but their methods were so flawed it was funny.)

    -- MarkusQ

  7. Re:Hum by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In order for this to work, they would have to make the beam extremely focused from transmitted to receiver.

    The article isn't very specific, but I would guess that they would have either used a parabolic reflector or a maser to do this.
    A parabolic reflector could focus the microwaves into a beam, much like that of a flashlight, but some energy would be lost to diffraction. A maser is similar to a laser, only it emits a coherant beam of microwaves that would travel from transmitter to receiver with minimum energy loss.

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...