Slashdot Mirror
Calling Software Reliability Into Question
phillymjs writes "CNN is running a story on software reliability, and how the lack of it may cost more and more lives as technology creeps further into everyday products. It appears a debate is finally starting amongst everyday (read: non-geek) people about vendor liability for buggy software. Some opponents of the liability push are unsurprising: Says the story, 'Microsoft contends that setting [reliability] standards could stifle innovation, and the cost of litigation and damages could mean more expensive software.' The article also says, however, that consumers' favortism of flashy products over reliable ones is partly to blame for the current state of software."
So...basically people are just finding out now that not all software is as perfect as it is intended to be?
Great..I'm gonna have to explain this one to my parents...
The anti-salmon
It is, but monday was just not long enough ::)
You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
And Bill Gates turns to the CEO of GM Motors and says, 'Why is your technology moving so slowly? If you advanced at the same rate as we do, we would have flying cars by now!' Immediatly the CEO of GM turnes to Billy and says, 'Because the government doesn't allow us to build cars that crash 4 times a day.'
Not to worry, the same article will be posted on Slashdot again tomorrow, possibly sooner.
Ditto.
BTW, you're down to 66 freaks. I have no idea why I foed you.
Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
Hmmm, you work for the same company I do, don't you?
A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
11) Profit?
cpeterso
Actually, Microsoft software is quite reliable. Reliability does not, however, imply security or stability. My friends' MS software crashes quite reliably. ;)