Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

New Insights into Synesthesia

Posted by michael on from the they've-gone-plaid dept.

regs writes "Synesthesia is a pretty interesting phenomenon to experience and even just contemplate. Those kooky scientists are at it again, with new insights into 'hearing smells', 'seeing sounds', and 'tasting colors'. A recent study seems to shed insight into the brain mechanisms involved in synesthesia. Interesting read."

3 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. Re:whoaa..like, I got an early post..it smells goo by sigep_ohio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'Do deaf people learn concerts as colors?'

    That would be impossible. The person with this disorder can still hear, but their brain is wired so that the impulses from your hearing receptors go to your optic part of the brain. Their for they are interpreted as colors. A deaf person would not be able to hear, so would not be able to transmit the impulses for them to see the concert.

    Although, being able to "see" a concert would be quite interesting. Probably not unlike tripping on acid.

    --
    Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
  2. Interesting tidbit by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I noticed when my 3 month old boys were talking, they'd wave their hands alot. One of my cow-orkers stated that at that point in development, both the vocalization and the movement were being handled by the same part of the brain.

    The point? Two disparate tasks are being run by the same ciruitry, so Synesthesia may just be another manefestation of a similar behavior.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  3. Re: 28 years ago, wtf? by big_pianist · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Okay. Wait. What?

    I'm probably replying to a very clever troll, and if so I'll have a nice day, but seriously:

    You cannot rightfully blame your father's schizophrenia or psychosis on one or two LSD trips that he had 28 years ago, especially since the disorder came on quickly and from nowhere. People develop schizophrenias and psychoses all the time without a catalyst such as LSD. It just happens, for whatever reason. Hallucinogens and psychotomimetics can be responsible for activating a latent disorder if all the conditions are just right (or just wrong, depending on how you want to see it). But they are not schizotoxins. You have to be fucked up already before these things will work against you. And from that, we get the standard hallucinogenic disclaimer as a corollary:

    "Individuals currently in the midst of emotional or psychological upheaval in their everyday lives should be careful about choosing to use strong psychedelics such as LSD as they can trigger even more difficulty. Also persons with a family history of schizophrenia or early onset mental illness should be extremely careful because LSD is known to trigger latent psychological and mental problems."
    There are plenty of reasons why people become schizophrenic or psychotic. LSD can certainly precipitate these effects but it happens immediately not out of the blue 28 years down the road. LSD may produce a temporary psyschotic state but schizophrenia is completely different from a user's state of mind while tripping. LSD, or any hallucinogen for that matter, does not cause schizophrenia in and of itself. Spreading FUD about a substance, which is relatively benign if used correctly, will not make your father suddenly snap back into reality.

    I feel sorry for your father -- I really do -- but your story does not provide me with ample evidence to accept your conclusion as truth.

    Sorry.

    Ciao