Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Sued for Defective Software

Door-opening Fascist writes "eWeek is reporting that a South Korean citizen action group, People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, is suing Microsoft for putting the SQL Slammer vulnerability into Windows. They are doing so on behalf of the South Korean people and businesses affected by SQL Slammer."

4 of 606 comments (clear)

  1. haha! by phillk6751 · · Score: 0, Troll

    serves them[Microsoft] right!

  2. Re:Silly lawsuit by ScottKin · · Score: 1, Troll

    No - the GPL supporters & developers just makes ad hominem attacks against companies that make software that when used under NORMAL conditions and under NORMAL environments are perfectly secure, except when mentally-maladjusted "hackers" want to try to cause trouble and make lame attempts at proving their programming prowess to make-up for the fact that they can't find a woman who will put-up with their poor hygene, a female anime/hentai fixation and lack of any social skills.

    Show me ANY Network Administrator or IT Director that actually has time in their life to review ALL of the source-code for any GPL'ed software to ensure that it is defect-free and I'll show you a person who is a perfect fit for all of the previously described deficiencies.

    ScottKin

    --
    I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
  3. Not on board. by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Troll

    Umm.. Microsoft didn't launch the attack, the dude who write the Slammer exploit did. Sue the criminal for causing the damage, not the device he used. Might as well sue gun manufacturers for not making guns human friendly.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  4. Re:Somewhere in Florida, lots of voters are riled. by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 0, Troll

    nice flamebait.

    if I had any misunderstandings of the law in as far as the election process, I wouldn't have mentioned that Bush legally won.

    however, legally winning and winning fairly are two seperate things. especially when the government claims to be a democracy, yet is not constitutionally required to even have a popular election, much less abid by it.