Slashdot Mirror


Mass Storage Leaves Microchips in the Dust

Roland Piquepaille writes "This article from Wired Magazine looks at storage with a new angle. 'Right now I am sitting in front of a whirring 60-gigabyte hard disk that cost less than $100. Do the math: If back then 10 megabytes cost $1,000, then 60 gigabytes would have cost x, where x = $6,000,000 and "back then" = 18 years ago. I'm sitting in front of $6,000,000 worth of mass storage, measured at mid-1980s prices. We have Moore's law for microprocessors. But who's coined a law for hard disks? In mass storage we have seen a 60,000-fold fall in price -- more than a dozen times the force of Moore's law.' DeLong also looks at a non-distant future when a $100 mass storage device will hold a full terabyte. He also thinks that with disk space becoming cheaper and cheaper, we'll be tempted to archive everything about ourselves, including pictures and videos. This is in fact the goal of the Gordon's Bell project, MyLifeBits. You can learn more about the MyLifeBits project by reading this NewsFactor Network article. Check this column for more details."

7 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. Chocolate Salty Balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Put em in your mouth

    Slow down cowboy! You'll never get first post that way.

  2. Phaeton Sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Forst Piss!

  3. TRINITY DIES in MATRIX RELOADED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    *Warning* spoiler in subject

  4. Bloat will kill the increase in storage availab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Bloat will kill the increase in storage available - one way or the other. It'll be a 3gig version of word, or windows movie maker that will only save in raw, non-compressed video. Anything to drive the market. We've seen it with processor speeds, if HD prices keep dropping I'm sure well see it with storage as well.

    Come on, is XP is SO far ahead of NT 4 that it requires 4x the ram? Of course not. But what MS reccomends, PC manufacturers will have to yield to.

  5. You slashdot editors stupid or something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    well, duh. But HDD's have moving parts and are not very reliable. They are *slow* in comparison. They have seek times. They sucks tons of current.

    Slashdot is going fucking downhill. Look at the 'you can use the parallel port to control 8 devices' story. ding ding ding! you can use an I/O port for I/O. it's the kind of thing most EE's do twhen they are twelve.

    slashdot = joke of the industry

  6. Re:This really helps but in perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    i too have gained perspective from the pictures of your father shoving his cock in your ass you fucking faggot. how's your sister's pussy? still sore from my lit cigar?

  7. Re:Faster than moore's law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Yes, thank you for pointing out what I've -already pointed out-. You're certainly wearing the clever pants today, aren't you?