Slashdot Mirror


New Loudspeaker Eliminates Distortive Influence

fejrskov writes "The Danish audio/video company 'Bang & Olufsen' announced a new loudspeaker which promises to eliminate the bad influence from walls, floors and ceilings on the sound. This is achieved by using two technologies: ALT (Acoustic Lens Technology) uses sound dispersing lenses to make sound travel equally in all directions. ABC (Adaptive Bass Control) involves sliding a tiny microphone out at the base of the speaker, playing a series of test sounds, and adapting the bass according to the measured acoustic response. Each active loudspeaker contains amplifiers for a total of 2500W (!) output using B&O's patented ICEPower concept. The price? Approximately 55.000 Danish kroner (8.000 Euro) each."

4 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. Ha the fools by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do they no realise that slashdot readers will soon have no windows and in some cases no walls, using paper thin LCD's instead so all this distortion reduction will be wasted.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  2. Can't wait (for the ground effect version) by pq · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This technology promises to eliminate the bad influence from walls, floors and ceilings on the sound.

    Yeah, I can't wait for the idiots who will shell out the megabucks to put this into their cars, along with the low rider suspension and the ground effect lighting. And when they pass me by in traffic, the loud obnoxious rap will still sound just as obnoxious. Only with less distortion. I mean, why do people even bother with the alphabet soup of technologies? SRS, XBS, ABC, PQT, does it make any difference when you listen to music that makes a point of distortion? Or does bubblegum pop sound magically better this way?

    Sorry for the rant, but it seems like people make a point of blasting their poor taste out of their car windows. And this will make things distortion free? Color me unimpressed.

    --
    "I will take the Ring," he said, "though I do not know the way."
  3. Re:why by gspr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We must be terrorists or something. Yes, we are. And we're contemplating crashing various flying vehicles into various tall buildings in the US. Please come, invade us, and give us freedom and "proper punctuations" in numbers. You can have our oil too.

  4. Fahrenheit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why the hell would anyone want to use Farenheit?

    Fahrenheit makes way more sense for human-experienced temperatures. A 100 point scale representing the reasonable range of temperatures experienced by a tremendous percentage of the world's population provides more fine-grained measurements than is offered by Centigrade. Additionally, 0-100 is the range of temperatures in which humans can expect to be able to survive. It's quite logical.

    If you want to argue fundamental superiority of scales, Centigrade is stupid, too. Kelvin is the only system that is actually logical (with 0 representing absolute zero and 273.15 representing the triple point of water.) Personally, I prefer the Rankind scale, but that's a different discussion entirely.