Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Quanta Gold Reviewed

Posted by timothy on from the what-it's-cracked-up-to-be dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Ever wondered how commercial Linux Web development environments stack up against those for other OS's? There's a reivew at Digital-Web of Quanta Gold, the commercial HTML editor from theKompany.com. I've always been a fan of Quanta Plus, but it's interesting to see what the commercial application has (and doesn't have). The full review of Quanta Gold can be found here."

2 of 12 comments (clear)

  1. No Documentation? by TaraByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't documentation supposed to be one of the big reasons people buy commercial vs. use noncommercial software?

    --
    Security is inversely proportional to the commitment of one desiring to circumvent it.
  2. Re:Bleeding for WinSCP by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Using kio_fish or kio_sftp along with Konqueror gives exactly the same functionality as WinSCP, only better since fish:// and sftp:// URLs work in any KDE application, not just Konqueror, and KDE can also handle ftp, http, webdav, and a number of other protocols at the same time.

    Simple drag and drop, mouse selected, secure transfers. Is this too much to ask?

    Not at all, it's a reality with KDE 3.1. I use it almost every day. Why are you using a pre-3.1 KDE anyway?

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}