Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Spam Blackhole Lists Redux

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the doubling-every-42-days dept.

tsu doh nimh writes "Are spam blackhole lists good, bad or indifferent? That appears to be the question they're tackling in this Washington Post story. It has some interesting back and forth between supporters of the lists and those who claim they condone censorship." J adds: Brad Templeton recently offered some comments on the most extreme pro-blacklist position.

4 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. You'd get better results... by craenor · · Score: 4, Funny

    By tossing spammers into blackholes...just a thought.

    1. Re:You'd get better results... by Zeebs · · Score: 4, Funny

      By tossing spammers into blackholes...just a thought.

      Now, what in gods name did blackholes ever do to you buddy!

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    2. Re:You'd get better results... by Zeebs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok, so you covered spammers, now what about the blackholes?

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
  2. What do you call... by djupedal · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do you call 100 spammers, chained together, and tossed into the ocean to drown?


    A start...