Slashdot Mirror


OSI vs SCO

the jackol writes "As expected, the OSI's just given the SCO vs IBM case a bite with this position paper. "SCO has never owned the UNIX trademark. IBM neither requested nor required SCO's permission to call their AIX offering a Unix. That decision lies not with the accidental owner of the historical Bell Labs source code, but with the Open Group.""

10 of 551 comments (clear)

  1. RAVA YUUUUUUUUU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    rong time!

  2. Rocketman, as interpreted by William Shatner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Good morning. In 1972, when Elton John and I wrote Rocketman, it became very popular among the listeners. Due to the interest and the meaning of the song, now, in 2003, I am truly proud, once again, to present my Rocketman, as interpreted by William Shatner. Thank you.

    Truly an American icon

  3. No by emo+boy · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    it said AXE...you know to kill with.

  4. Re:If this is not the first post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    OK, let's see those links to naked eyeballs then.

  5. Re:As an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I agree with your brilliant post.

  6. Ogg Vorbis .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Ogg is vorbising for you bitch!

  7. Man I just read that whole thing... by xMonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    PWND!

  8. Interactive UNIX by thomasa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I spend $1500 on a unlimited user UNIX
    called Interactive UNIX. It was marketed
    by Sun at the time. It was a true SVR3.2
    running on Intel. This was in 1994.

  9. Re:As an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I am also an attorney (Hey, we guys should have a party some time!) and I hate to break it to you, but I fear for the the future of Twinkies. 7-11 doesn't have a legal leg to stand on.

  10. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    How does crap like this get mod'd as insightful? The original poster was obviously making a facetious remark. To mod the above response as insightful is almost criminally stupid. It should have been mod'd as 'dense'.