Slashdot Mirror


Memory Timings Analysis

keefe007 writes "It's generally known that smaller and more aggressive memory timings combined with higher clock speeds leads to higher performance, but for the most part, the increase in performance from tweaking each individual setting is relatively unknown. Perhaps in a bit too ambitious move, I set out to examine the impact of each individual memory timing and clock speed on overall performance. Find out the results of the tests at Techware Labs."

9 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like an Ad... by KingRamsis · · Score: -1, Troll

    Crucial was gracious enough to send me two 128MB sticks of their PC2700 solution to aid my testing.


    and also from the article:

    Crucial 128MB PC2700 DDR RAM: Part #CT1664Z355

    heck what is missing a big BUY NOW blinking ?

    1. Re:Sounds like an Ad... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, no, because I have something called 'integrity.' Which means I probably won't be getting any free crap anytime soon.

      Which is just as well, because crap is still crap, no matter if it's free or not. And if you encourage people to spend money on something that you know is worthless, you're the kind of person that'll be getting a ball peen hammer to the forehead sooner or later.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  2. Rocketman, as interpreted by William Shatner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Good afternoon. In 1972, when Elton John and I wrote Rocketman, it became very popular among the listeners. Due to the interest and the meaning of the song, now, in 2003, I am truly proud, once again, to present my Rocketman, as interpreted by William Shatner. Thank you.

    Truly an American icon

  3. ThinkGeek blows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Don't spend your money with those t00ls. Their ads, filled with tired uber-dork cliches, make me nauseous. "Hella kewl"... Jesus...

  4. horse cock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    horse cock for better performance

  5. moron va lairIE's pateNTdead PostBlock(tm) devise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    it sucks/bytes. so, either turn it on, or off, robbIE. you/we all know who you are/what you've become, so why pretend?

    just whois your daddIE?

    the distrust for sum of your/lairIE's corepirate 'sponsors', is probably not going to go away soon, no matter how much hot butturd payper liesense hostage ransom stock markup ?pr? FUDge you spew out of your pourtoll.

    as for lairIE's payper?

  6. *BSD IS DYING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray , as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dying

  7. Re:I've found.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Ever considered the effects of fucking yourself with dildos whilst reading slashdot the entire day??

  8. Re:Only one operating system? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    "What, only Windows XP was used for the tests as well? Why not run tests also against Linux and BSD on the same hardware too? Your result will vary...

    Testing just Windows is like test driving the Indy 500 ... driving a Pinto. You certainly won't be getting the full eXPerience."


    Could be worse. He could have just tested Linux. How many extra FPS are you going to squeeze out of Tux Racer? Might as well test a speedboat in an olympic sized swimming pool. "I can drive nowhere, but I'm getting there real fast!"