Slashdot Mirror


Ghostscript Leaves GNU

commanderfoxtrot writes "Ghostscript 7.07 has been released. However, this is the last GNU release. They will continue to make releases under the GNU GPL, but because of disagreements over censorship of the AFPL releases and the development model in the GNU release their development process has become incompatible with the goals of the GNU project as interpreted by Richard Stallman."

4 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Have to side with the GNU folks here. by raph · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mmm, nothing like being slashdotted. I'll try to comment on some factual points, though.

    There is no "Artifex Public License". There is the AFPL, or "Aladdin Free Public License," but we've never claimed this to be open-source, as it's not consistent with the Open Source Definition.

    Our decision separate from the GNU name has no effect on the freedoms guaranteed to our users. We've always done a GPL release within a year of the AFPL release, and will continue to do so.

    The text quoted above correctly describes the AFPL versions of Ghostscript - commercial distribution is not allowed. However, commercial Linux distributions do of course distribute the GPL version.

    --

    LILO boot: linux init=/usr/bin/emacs

  2. Re:Imagine that by jonadab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Stallman has done more harm to the Open Source movement than
    > anyone else.

    That's over the top. Granted, Stallman is an idealistic nutcase
    with strange ideas and strange priorities, and he likes to shove
    them down everyone's throat, but nevertheless he has actually
    provided quite a bit of really useful stuff. He coordinated the
    early development of some very important things: gcc (without
    which we wouldn't have Linux *or* Free/Net/Open BSD in their
    current forms) and a number of important filesystem tools, plus
    of course Emacs, without which we would all die or (worse ;-)
    have to use vim.

    It's only recently, after the OSS movement gained some real
    momentum in the form of lots of programmers writing code, that
    RMS seems to have stopped contributing anything useful himself
    and gone off into full-time-ideology mode. (Does he still write
    code these days? HURD? What? Anything anyone *uses*?)

    Still, even in full-time-ideology mode, he's mostly harmless.
    Most folks pay more attention to other people (ESR for example),
    and even the people who consider RMS as the big leader don't buy
    his most inane ramblings. What harm has he done, other than
    annoy people such as yourself who haven't learned to ignore him?

    Yes, the GS departure is another example of how the Gnu project
    is becomming irrelevant. But the Gnu project is becomming
    irrelevant *mostly* because the open-source movement has gained
    such momentum that it no longer needs the FSF as such. We depend
    on certain Gnu software, but if the FSF evaporated tomorrow we'd
    still have (and still be able to develop and improve) that
    software. The FSF as an institution we no longer need, and the
    reason we no longer need them is because (though RMS does not
    realise it yet) they were successful.

    The FSF gave people like Linus the tools they needed to create
    free software. The internet gave them the ability to easily
    share it. Linux attracted lots of developers and created a
    critical momentum. Companies like RedHat and IBM gave the
    movement enough credibility (in the eyes of suits) to force
    everyone in the industry to take notice. The rest is details.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  3. GNU/Ghostscript by hayriye · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must call it GNU/Ghostscript...

    1. Re:GNU/Ghostscript by FlowerPotAdmin · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're running ghostscript as your kernel??? (Sick, sick people... ::shakes head::)

      --
      -Justin
      That's enough posting for now lads, there're trolls afoot.