Slashdot Mirror


PPC 970 Confirmed for Apple?

batboy78 writes "In what perhaps is the first 'official' confirmation that IBM's PowerPC 970's will be used by Apple, BusinessWeek claims that IBM has confirmed that it's developing a new set of chips for the Mac: 'IBM says the new Apple chip will be of the 64-bit variety, which means it can process twice as much information per cycle as existing 32-bit chips.'" CT The article has been updated to make the confirmation seem... well, far less comfirming.

9 of 379 comments (clear)

  1. 64bit by labratuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    IBM says the new Apple chip will be of the 64-bit variety, which means it can process twice as much information per cycle as existing 32-bit chips.

    Argh! Head... going... to... explode...

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    1. Re:64bit by cpeterso · · Score: 4, Funny


      By the time Quark finally releases QuarkXPress for Mac OS X, Apple will have released the 64-bit Mac OS X on the PPC970.

      Q: How long will it take for Quark to make QuarkXPress' code 64-bit ready?

      A: Never.

  2. So... by tinrobot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does that mean my G3 isn't a supercomputer anymore?

  3. Re:64 != (2*32) by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok.. I wish people would get this through thier heads. A 64 bit chip is _NOT_ inherently faster than a 32 bit chip

    Yeah, but how many libraries of congress can it fit in a volkswagen?

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  4. Re:64 != (2*32) by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, no, son, the standard is "on the head of a pin", not "in a Volkswagen"! :)

    Volkswagens are units of measurements for sizes of asteroids that are about to impact Earth.

    Other measurements in this system:

    % of the width of a human hair
    Length of a football field
    Length of an Olympic-sized swimming pool
    Equivalent # of bowls to 1 bowl of Colon Blow (or Super Colon Blow) cereal

    And you thought _metric_ was cool... :)

  5. 1.8 GHz per second by tm2b · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was more intrigued by the "1.8 GHZ per second" claim.

    1.8 Billion instructions per second per second. It's about time that somebody made an accelerating chip - way to go, IBM!

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  6. Re:Confirmation? by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Confirmation could be the IBM logo stamped on the 601 PPC chip in the first power macs.

  7. Nice tie in, quark and this 64 bit chip... by weave · · Score: 4, Funny
    Maybe the new chip will be used to explain away why Quark took so long. Perhaps they skipped development for 32 bit OS X and concentrate on the 64 bit processor, etc, etc...

    As in, it'll be announced that Quark is available, but only on the new 64-bit power macs, driving the sales of both.

  8. Re:Me, Too! by grahamlee · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm posting this on a ZX Spectrum via home-rolled TCP/IP stack. Do I win a 12" powerbook?