FreeBSD 5.1 beta2 Now Available

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

FreeBSD 5.1 beta2 Now Available

Posted by timothy on Wednesday May 21, 2003 @09:09AM from the free-like-the-wind dept.

Dan writes "FreeBSD Release Engineering Team's Scott Long has uploaded the 5.1 i386 Beta2 release of FreeBSD. He will be uploading the alpha release, work is under way to get a beta2 for sparc64 and pc98. Downloads for i386 are available here."

15 of 32 comments (clear)

Of course... by Dimwit · 2003-05-21 09:12 · Score: 4, Informative

If you wanted to be nice to those folks at the FreeBSD project, you could always use a mirror.

In fact, in the future it might not be a bad idea to have Slashdot only link to freebsdmirrors.org. I know that the FreeBSD people have gotten pissed in the past about that...

--
...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
1. Re:Of course... by coughfeeman · 2003-05-21 09:16 · Score: 2, Interesting
  
  Um, I thought this was exactly what bitTorrent was for, as opposed to the animatrix series (which actually was fed faster by the originating servers).
2. Re:Of course... by Piquan · 2003-05-21 10:32 · Score: 1
  
  Is there a way to originate bittorrent from Unix? It looked like you needed Windows, and those of us serious enough about FreeBSD to care may not have Windows!
3. Re:Of course... by edhall · 2003-05-21 10:42 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Just because the server can handle the load doesn't mean that its network connection has the bandwidth. The OS is often irrelevent.
  
  In fact, in many cases of "slashdotting" the servers (whatever they're running) do fine, but the network "pipe" isn't big enough. There's a bit of a positive feed back loop as well, since the tiny bandwidth available for any given connection makes it slower, and thus take longer, and thus increase the number of simultaneous connections the server has to handle. The latter can be hell on database backends (a common failure mode when DB-driven sites are overloaded) and on a poorly-configured server can run it out of system resources as well.
  
  As for FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2, I'm sure it could handle the load, but it's not going to be as stable as FreeBSD 4.8, and the FreeBSD folks will freely admit as much. That's why it's "BETA," and it's also why the 5.x branch most likely won't be labeled "STABLE" until 5.2. Until then, the place to test it is as a member of a server farm, where if it does happen to have trouble the load will immediately be taken over by other machines. It really isn't appropriate to use beta software as a stand-alone FTP server. That doesn't mean that people won't try (just like there are servers out there running Linux 2.5). But it would be irresponsible to do this for any server that is mission-critical.
  
  -Ed
4. Re:Of course... by eht · 2003-05-21 11:36 · Score: 2, Interesting
  
  the original client is python based and could be run under pretty much anything, freebsd even has it in their ports
5. Re:Of course... by essdodson · 2003-05-21 14:44 · Score: 1
  
  FreeBSD 5.1 is not, and will not be production quality. Stick with 4.x for production machines for another 6 months or more.
  
  --
  scott
6. Re:Of course... by MavEtJu · 2003-05-21 17:37 · Score: 1
  
  That's why it's "BETA," and it's also why the 5.x branch most likely won't be labeled "STABLE" until 5.2.
  
  Not completely true. It's called beta because it are the test-CD images for the 5.1 release.
  
  --
  bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
7. Re:Of course... by edhall · 2003-05-21 18:05 · Score: 1
  
  Not completely true. It's called beta because it are the test-CD images for the 5.1 release.
  
  No; see the schedule. You're thinking of 5.1-RC1 (the "release candidate").
  
  -Ed
8. Re:Of course... by MavEtJu · 2003-05-21 19:41 · Score: 1
  
  Aha, you're right. But still it's not beta because it's not yet -STABLE, it's because it's not -RELEASE.
  
  --
  bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Re:tag ? by stefanb · 2003-05-22 01:10 · Score: 3, Informative

Using cvsup, I suppose the tag should be RELENG_5_1. However, using this tag it just removes the contents of my /usr/src folder.
There is no such branch; snapshots are not branched. Nor are they tagged.
Until -stable will be split off around 5.2 release, it's still HEAD, or for the purpose of cvsup, tag=.
Re:tag ? by Groganz · 2003-05-22 06:17 · Score: 3, Informative

Using cvsup, I suppose the tag should be RELENG_5_1. However, using this tag it just removes the contents of my /usr/src folder.

There is no such branch; snapshots are not branched. Nor are they tagged.
Until -stable will be split off around 5.2 release, it's still HEAD, or for the purpose of cvsup, tag=.
There is already a RELENG_5_0 for 5.0-RELEASE patches. There will be a RELENG_5_1 branch created around the end of the month.
5.1 Release Process
Extended partitions by chrysalis · 2003-05-22 07:07 · Score: 1

Is there any way to install FreeBSD on an extended DOS partition ? I've never been able to install FreeBSD 5 on my workstation because of this limitation.

--
{{.sig}}
1. Re:Extended partitions by Arandir · 2003-05-22 18:25 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  There's no way that I know of. Most operating systems cannot boot from anything but a primary partition, with Linux being the only exception that I know of. Slices are the BSD version of logical partitions, and from what I understand, they predate Microsoft's extended/logical partition scheme. BSD can access DOS logical partitions just fine, but it can't boot from them.
  
  There is a workaround though. Convert that logical partition to a primary partition. This will probably involve some shuffling around, so get a good repartitioner. Once you have a free primary partition, install away.
  
  Or do what I do, and use a separate harddrive. At one time this was prohibitive, but drives are so cheap now that it's the easy and simple solution.
  
  --
  A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
Torrent for MiniDist ISO (please mod up) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-05-23 01:57 · Score: 2, Informative

I've put a torrent up for the MiniDist ISO:
ftp://ftp3.freebsd.org/pub/torrents/5.1-BETA2-i386 -miniinst.iso.torrent
Re:Heh all of *BSD is alpha by dadragon · 2003-05-23 15:27 · Score: 1

P.S. I'm still waiting for PS/2 keyboard support

That's what happens when you don't upgrade past 0.01.

--
God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!