Slashdot Mirror


Foreign E3 Journalists Body Searched, Deported

Thanks to Janko for pointing out a press release at Reporters Without Borders denouncing the US authorities for deporting French games journalists sent to cover E3. The complaint alleges that "..these journalists were treated like criminals - subjected to several body searches, handcuffed, locked up and fingerprinted", after arriving in Los Angeles on (arguably misleading) tourist visas to cover the E3 trade show. It doesn't seem to have been just the French, either - messageboard reports indicate at least 5 British journalists from a variety of publications had a similar treatment. Who'd have thought attending E3 could be so.. dangerous?

78 comments

  1. Jeez by rhuntley12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    6 body searchs? That seems just a tad bit in excess, don't you think?

    1. Re:Jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, they lost a glove on the first one, and it took a bit of poking around to find it again...

    2. Re:Jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How is the above post a troll?
      I agree with it entirely. 6 body searches on game journalists? Use your brain people. When is the US going to pull it's head out it's ass so it can stop sticking it's hands up other peoples?

    3. Re:Jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if they're French. Lousy bastards.

      Now the British on the other hand... yeah leave those guys alone, they've pretty much always had our back, since that little war of 1812 thing anyway.

  2. French? by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely you mean Freedom journalists?

  3. Games on the Brain! by jpsowin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, we all know that games cause violence, and foreigners are terrorists (especially when our alert is on HIGH!). So if you have people coming overseas coming to a large game conference....

    Sorry. I just couldn't resist. :D

    1. Re:Games on the Brain! by dar · · Score: 1

      Appreciate the humor, but your timing is off. We weren't on High alert during E3. That happened after.

      --
      My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
  4. seperate groups by visualight · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Okay, two groups of french journalists, both covering the same event, but arriving on different days, get treated like this. Might it be retribution against the French for not doing what the U.S. ordered them to do (Iraq)? It does seem like the French are being singled out.

    --
    Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    1. Re:seperate groups by DjReagan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The French are being singled out? What part of "It doesn't seem to have been just the French, either - messageboard reports indicate at least 5 British journalists from a variety of publications had a similar treatment" don't you understand?

      --
      "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
    2. Re:seperate groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 5 British spoken of had French accents...

    3. Re:seperate groups by Virus1984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Might it be retribution against the French for not doing what the U.S. ordered them to do (Iraq)?

      Event if it was it shouldn't have happened...no one, I repeat NO ONE is supposed to do whatever the USA tell them to do; especially when the order is to wage war on some random country just because.

      --
      Don't forget to think different.
    4. Re:seperate groups by Darkstorm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Might it be retribution against the French for not doing what the U.S. ordered them to do (Iraq)?

      The US was not orering the French to do anything, as I remember it the French said they would veto anything that the US wanted to do. The French had lots of contracts with Iraq and Sadam, so it came down to money. Since terrorist are becoming brave again and are looking to cause more terror, the US is stepping up on its security. Did the Security people single out the French reporters? I wouldn't be supprised, and quite honestly don't care. Since they are picking on others too it helps hide the fact they are singling people out.

      Overall they basicly harrassed the journalist because they can, and because right now France has shown that they have only self interest in mind and don't really like the US that much. (This is based on the attitude the French Govt has displayed over the past many months) So when US security gives French people a hard time, its not that it makes it right, but its the little peoples way of getting thier own revenge. If the French want better treatment from the US, then they should act like a friend to the US. As long as they keep showing an attitude that they dislike the US, the response is going to be negitive.

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    5. Re:seperate groups by Cackmobile · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If the French want better treatment from the US, then they should act like a friend to the US"

      A friend doesn't mean doing what ever they want you to do. Friends offer each other advice and disagree on different things.

      BTW That whole incident shows why the UN is flawed. Why should 5 countries have the right to veto and get their own way. Everything should be voted on and no one have special powers.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    6. Re:seperate groups by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

      BTW That whole incident shows why the UN is flawed. Why should 5 countries have the right to veto and get their own way. Everything should be voted on and no one have special powers.


      I agree, still wouldn't be perfect but would be a big improvement.

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    7. Re:seperate groups by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the fact that 5 British journalists were also subjected to this, despite the fact that the British supported the US in the war, means what? Maybe that your theory is all wet?

      I'll tell you what I think happened. They came into the country on tourist visas, and when they were asked why they had come to the US, they said "we're journalists going to a games conference." The Homeland Security goons looked at the visas, saw that they either lied to get their visas or were lying to the goons, and determined them to be security risks. Hence the cavity searches.

      So the moral of the story is...if you have a tourist visa and the Homeland Security goons ask if you're here to go to Disneyland, you SAY YES!

    8. Re:seperate groups by andyt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a point of info : I don't believe they lied to get their visas. The UK (and, I think, France) has a "Visa Waiver Program" with the USA. This states that you don't need a visa if you're travelling to the USA for non-business use for a period of up to 6 months.

      So, yes, they should have got a working visa (a J-1?) but they didn't lie.. they just didn't think they needed one.

      These are all Europeans, used to being able to travel anywhere in Europe and report on trade shows and what-have-you without restriction. Any EU citizen can work in any other country, it is part of the Free Trade agreement.

      The UK journos might not have realised the differences. If you can go report on things in Germany or Spain, wouldn't you think you could do the same in the US?

      Actually, the more I think about it, the more I realise how difficult it would be to get the correct visa. Under current US law, the only way for a non-citizen to get a permit to work is either to be sponsored by a US company (who has to prove that nobody in the USA can do that job) or marry someone. How would a journo for a foreign paper get such a visa?

      (Disclaimer : The USA currently has over 40 different categories of visas. There might be a different one that applies).

    9. Re:seperate groups by rEWDBOi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So it's okay to harrass one country's citizens just because the leader of said country disagree with the leader of another country about political issues? It's just plain racist b#llsh*t to say "the French" per se had that point of view. I don't know if you're aware of the fact that people might disagree with their leaders. I know I do. But I guess you just do whatever your leader tells you to. I think that's called fascism. Or at least it's part of the concept of fascism.

    10. Re:seperate groups by ronfar · · Score: 1
      It's just plain racist b#llsh*t to say "the French" per se had that point of view.
      Actually, it would be more correct to say "nationalist b#llsh*t," which is indeed something the US is drowning in lately.
      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    11. Re:seperate groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like how Americans are singled out in France and treated like 3rd-rate scum?
      Could you mean that, possible, some animosity exists here, and the French were given a taste of their own egotistical, self-centered, better-than-thou and-if-you-aren't-French-then-you-are-nothing hospitality?

      Well, excuse me if I'm not bothered.

      I only wish I were one of the homeland security personnell. Then I would have been able to give them a swift boot in the ass on their way out and said, "Now go away before I taunt you a second time!"

    12. Re:seperate groups by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      " So the moral of the story is...if you have a tourist visa and the Homeland Security goons ask if you're here to go to Disneyland, you SAY YES!"

      Crap. The visa waiver programs for European citizens is for "business and pleasure". As a business man, no one wants to go through a "work visa" application, when all he does is making business with American partners. What's the differenc between physical presence and other means of communication you can conduct your business with, be it telephone, mail or videoconferencing.

      If as a business man I don't feel welcome but am regarded as a potential threat to national security, then I'd rather bring my business to places where I feel welcomed and my business is appreciated.

      Which is exactly what I did and considering the USA's political development over the last 2 years, I am quite happy with that decision.

  5. Surprise? by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is about rights that are no longer protected or respected by our government. Many people say in response to criticism of the patriot act and the atrophy of civil rights long before that "How are you less free now? What can't you do now because of xxx" - Well here it is. The bill of rights and could dissappear tomorrow, and america would be little different, except for the unlucky. You could be an unlucky one today.

    Some of you may cite the fact that they are not citizens, but that is just a loophole considering anyone can be declared an enemy combatent.

    We are in a critical period in our history, the age oil is peaking, and there is a single super power on the planet redefining itself - apparently into a extreme right fascist global empire. Pay close attention.

    --
    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    1. Re:Surprise? by jfisherwa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Well here it is. The bill of rights could disappear tomorrow .."

      It's a passing phase due to the government accentuating the after-effects of "9/11." Our society has such short-term memory that this will all be forgotten by the next generation. Looking at the history of America, this has always been both unfortunate and a blessing rolled into one, but always something we simply need to accept.

    2. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You guys are missing the point. When you come to America to work, you do so on a B-1 "visit for business" visa as opposed to a B-2 "visit for tourism" visa. Certainly it seems these guys were treated a little roughly, but it was utterly stupid of their employers not to ensure they applied for the appropriate visas.

      Really, complaining about this is like complaining about being pulled over for speeding. On the one hand, yes, it is a pretty minor offense, but on the other other hand if you break the law then it's pretty much tough luck, bud. Don't get me wrong, i've broken the law myself (drug possession etc), but if you get caught you have no leg to stand on.

    3. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These were foreigners who do not have any rights under the US Constitution. What the hell is the problem?

    4. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Actually, I don't understand this, as I have worked in the US on a visa waiver, and declared that I am here for business: it is allowed now (at least for UK citizens) so I do not see what they need visas for and why they were treated so.

      So I think they have every right to be complaining.

    5. Re:Surprise? by regen · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is about rights that are no longer protected or respected by our government.

      No, this is about rights they never had. They came over here to work, and they had tourist visa. They should have gotten the correct type of visa. The US has in the past been lax about enforcement of this for short term assignments such as this, but Europe has not.

      France is much worse. Have you ever tried to work in France. The country is so heavily unionized, and it is so difficult to get a temporary work visa. A company I used to work for had a plant in southern France. We occasionally would have to sent prototype electronics to this plant for work they were doing. Because they were prototypes, the company wanted to have an employee bring them over. US employee couldn't do this because of french visa issues. French employees had to fly to the US to pick up the part and bring it back.

      The French are only getting what they have been dishing out for years. Serves them right.

    6. Re:Surprise? by (trb001) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would that I had mod points for you, my friend. This is a classic example of border patrol doing what they're supposed to. Sorry if it took them slightly over a day to figure out there was no harm being done by the people with the incorrect visas, but they weren't roughed up, didn't have their rights stripped from them, had a speedy trip from accusal to judgement and were transported safely back home.

      I salute the officers on this case.

      --trb

    7. Re:Surprise? by RedCard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      These were foreigners who do not have any rights under the US Constitution. What the hell is the problem?

      Because they're still human beings, you jackass.

      Have you ever travelled outside the US? Would you like to be subject to a number of body searches by foreign customs officers? Even if they found nothing the first time? And they had no real reason to believe that you're any kind of threat other than a small error on your visa?

      If you can accept that, and you could accept that happening to you when you leave your warm, cozy, mushy, homogenous mass that is the US at this point in history - well, I pity you.

      The US has done great things, and has the power to do yet more great things, but the state of fear and abuse of power that your contry and administration seem to be in now is getting in the way of the good that you could be doing for yourselves and for all of mankind.

      It's the closed-minded thinking of people like you, Anonymous Dipshit, that keep your country in a state of fearful apathy.

    8. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're still human beings, you jackass.

      I thought they were French?

    9. Re:Surprise? by cronostitan · · Score: 0

      >>Because they're still human beings, you jackass. >I thought they were French? I thought you were intelligent?

      --
      Spelling errors were made for your amusement only...
    10. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are in a critical period in our history, the age oil is peaking, and there is a single super power on the planet redefining itself - apparently into a extreme right fascist global empire. Pay close attention.

      Next you'll be pointing out that the German word for Department of Home[Father]land Security can be abbrieviated to it's more commonly known initials, S.S.

      That is commie (oh, wait, we yell terrorist when we want a witch hunt now, my bad) thinking my friend. Why, I have a good mind to report you to TIPS!

      Posted anonymously because we'd hate for all of Mr Ashcrofts lovely hardware to go unused.

    11. Re:Surprise? by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      I'm (sortof) British and I'm about to attend a confrence in LA. This is work in a way as I am presenting a paper. Should I have a work visa to give freely to the world my latest research? I dont have a work visa and dont see any justification to be "subjected to several body searches" because I want to go to a confrence. I am about to spend a huge ammount of money staying there and I am giving a great big lump of research away for free to everyone. I don't see any need for action like this in exchenge.

      It is simmilar the other way round. A student from the US who visits regurally as he is working on the same project as us has to now get a full workers visa even though he is funded by the US university.

    12. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point.

      And this quote from about the sixth paragraph:

      "One official told Alfonsi he would not be able to return to the United States again."

      So one of these characters was actually banned from the country. I think there is a lot more to this story that Reporters Without Borders is not telling us.

    13. Re:Surprise? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Just figured I would join in reinforcing the concept of actually having some idea what the truth of the story is before believing at face-value a news report from a biased source. I opened this thread expecting to see a lot of bleeding hearts, and was pleasantly surprised to see people instead actually congratulating Customs on doing their damn jobs :)

  6. Re:yes by Tink2000 · · Score: 1, Funny

    So _you're_ the type that buys all the Olsen Twin games. God bless your trolling heart!

  7. Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok, let's get this straight. A bunch of journalists try to enter America without the proper paperwork, and get this, they get locked up and then deported! What a tyrannical government! It's an outrage I tell you! An outrage!

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    1. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by richi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last time I checked, citizens of an EU country don't need a visa for a stay in the USA of up to 90 days, even if they're working.

      Of course, why should we expect that this publication should tell the Feds' side of the story, or do anything else resembling "proper" journalism, eh? ;-)

      r.

    2. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Last time I checked, citizens of an EU country don't need a visa for a stay in the USA of up to 90 days, even if they're working.

      Really? No, I don't think that's right.

      If you have a Business Visa then maybe (sounds like these guys didn't). If you have a Tourist Visa (which people from the EU usually routinely get given), then you are NOT supposed to work at all. The immigration officers have a certain amount of discretion (presumably based on guidelines), but that's all. The guidelines vary somewhat over time though, and I suspect that this may be part of the problem.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by richi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, really, old chap. For many years now, the USA have run what they call a "Visa waiver program" (sic). My US visa expired years ago, but I still enter the US for work roughly 10 times per year, simply by filling in an I-94(W) "landing card".

      r.

    4. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right on this, though i wonder if they filled in the card incorrectly. They really have noone but themselves to blame - if you fill in that you're just there to visit Hollywood but the customs official asks and finds out you're actually covering a large corporate event for a foreign publication it does present a pretty good case for checking the situation out a bit more. Hell, i've been detained at customs in my own country (Australia), had all my belongings swabbed for drug residues (even the mirror in my compact!) ... The bottom line is that customs officials are just plain assholes and always have been - pre or post 9/11.

    5. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Of course, why should we expect that this publication should tell the Feds' side of the story, or do anything else resembling "proper" journalism, eh?

      Excellent point. I don't even see in the article where it says something like "a State Department official declined comment" or "a US Customs representative refused to comment until an internal investigation was completed."

      It seems like an organization of "reporters" should take the time to investigate a story before simply slapping it on a web page (and if they did investigate the other side, surely that should be in the story).

    6. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by Bob+Zer+Fish · · Score: 1

      If you are British, then since the UK and US have an agreement, we don't need to have visas. Whether France, along with the rest of the EU, has such an agreement, I really do not know.

    7. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by Mighty+LoPan · · Score: 1

      An interesting side effect of the Visa waiver program is that you can totally circumvent the entire Fiance Visa program. To marry a foreigner and have the person move into the US to live with you, you have to apply for a fiance visa. Then the foreigner has to wait in the foreign country until it goes through. It has an automatic 6-month waiting period. However, if the foreigner lives in a country that's part of the Visa waiver program, s/he can come over on the 90-day waiver period, marry during that time, and BAM! instant "temporary permanent residency", which can be upgraded to permanent residency after 2 years of marriage. Just an FYI for all you internet love-birds. :)

    8. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by simoniker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just came across a good article which explains some of the issues, here at Reason Online.

      A quote: the journos were "..trying to enter the U.S. the same way European journalists have been coming for the last 17 years: on the Visa Waiver program, which allows the citizens of 27 friendly countries (from Andorra to Switzerland) to visit the States up to 90 days without a visa, as long as the trip is for "business or pleasure." Journalism, according to American consular writ, does not qualify as either."

    9. Re:Yeah right, this is about games, uh huh by Unordained · · Score: 1

      so, you go to an E3 conference, with games everywhere, to write up articles to be published, so you can get paid, and this is -neither- business nor pleasure? hell, i'll take either. games. money. but neither?

  8. Could have been worse. by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Informative

    They could have been named David Nelson.

  9. other foreign journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Several N. Korean game journalists were admitted to the expo despite admitting to nefarious purposes.

    Seriously, this whole thing is very foul and flagrant. They're asking for an international incident with this.

    1. Re:other foreign journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a grip, it was some scumbag frogs going to cover a game convention. It's not even worth making an issue out of it.

  10. Just one more proof that by imaniack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Terrorists have already won. :(

    1. Re:Just one more proof that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the sun rises, the terrorists have won.
      If somebody eats mac n cheese, the terrorists have won.
      If CmdrTaco posts another story, the terrorists have won.
      If anti-Bush trolls start making sense, the terrorists have won.

    2. Re:Just one more proof that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed.

  11. Re:france... by innerlimit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    whaddayawant, the guy emptying the bottle was couldn't make out wether it was an american or a ralph lauren shirt (maybe he doesn't ralph-lauren-wearing-snobs)

    seriously, america needs a humility lesson...

  12. Re:france... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if the French aren't the biggest snobs on the planet...

  13. My bad... by Scorchio · · Score: 5, Funny

    I slipped the authorities £20 to intercept my manager and lead designer, who got to go to the show. I think my descriptions must have been a little vague.

  14. In _some_ countries... by Dreetje · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we know something we call Human rights. Even if you have a wrong visa (but you still have one!) then why you have to be cuffed and locked up?

    Really, would a terrorist get any visa? And if they do, would they mix them up? Terrorism can't be an excuse to do anything you want, there are some rights everyone should have, and one of them is, innocent till proven, so why treat them like they are not?

    --
    Dre
  15. Re: Work and work by woom · · Score: 1

    So if i am to attend a business trade show, i need a different visa than if i was to attend a consumer trade show?
    Sounds a bit Catbertish... oops, sorry, patriotic is the word, right?

  16. After all... by keiferb · · Score: 3, Funny

    We -are- at a terrorism level of "Taupe" in the US. That means the "authorities" can do whatever they want to whomever they want. God bless taupe.

  17. Ummm... So? by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeah, all the body searches are over the top (if ya didn't find anything the first time...) But what is the big deal? Should "journalists" be allowed to enter a country with out the proper parperwork just because they are "journalists"?

    A couple years ago, we may have said the same thing about a bunch of people form the middle east that wanted to go to airline pilot school in Florida... We all know what happened to those guys...

  18. This is a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is either journalistic retribution or an ambitious journalist looking to squeeze out a story.

    I highly doubt some guards targeted and sought to 'get back' at the french. It doesn't make any sense. This is just a bunch of poorly trained guards harassing a few foreign journalists. This is the same b*tchin and moanin' from a car accident that's twisted to look like a hate crime.

    There's no way to defend against it. Times like this it feels like global society's hit another crutch and like pointing fingers at the 'bad and evil' US empire.

  19. The visa issue by Kyouken · · Score: 3, Informative

    Accually, I was detained for a few hours some years back over the same issue. The visa waiver thingy means you can't accually -work- while being in the US, you can interview people, write articles etc., but you can't publish anything -while- you're in the US. For this you need a special visa or something, which I didn't have, and I suspect the French journalists didn't have either. The kind officers of the US Immigration Service (or something) eventually let me go, but they could've easily put me on the first plane back. Or body searched me a few times, detained me for 24 hours and -then- put me on a plane. After this incident, I never ever ever get into specifics over what kind of work I'll be doing at E3. I suspect the French journalists may have answered 'mais oui, i will publish my articles while I'm here' for all this to have happened. I also suspect the fact that they're French didn't exactly get them any favours.

  20. Actual Experience? by dman123 · · Score: 1
    Have you tried this? A serious question. From personal experience, I know that there is language in the fiance visa application or other similar document that states that it is illegal to enter the US with the intent of marriage without the correct fiance visa. When you petitioned to change to permanent residency (conditional or non-conditional) did they question you about this circumvention?

    I assume they can, if they want, deny the change in status, deport the fiance and make you apply for a spouse visa and make life all around miserable

    And the rules may have changed from several years ago, but in my case the visa was processed in about 2-3 months without any mandatory waiting period. In fact, after a year of planning, we almost had to move up the wedding date to accomodate the efficiency of the IRS and the three month expiry of the visa.

    --

    --
    dman123 forever!
    Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    1. Re:Actual Experience? by Mighty+LoPan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I actually did this without incident. I didn't want to wait six months with my fiance in a foreign country, so we used this loophole to get her in the country. They weren't too pleased when we had our immigration interview, but they didn't give us any trouble.

    2. Re:Actual Experience? by dman123 · · Score: 1
      Ok. Glad it worked out.

      Speaking of immigration interviews, I was slightly disappointed I never had to answer the "test for fraud" questions like, "What type of shampoo does your spouse use?" or "Where do you most often eat dinner and with what type of dishes?" I guess I watch too much TV. They just videotaped us swearing that we were obeying all the rules and sent us on our way.

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    3. Re:Actual Experience? by Mighty+LoPan · · Score: 1

      We didn't even get videotaped. We didn't get the shampoo questions, either. In fact, it was almost too easy...

  21. The dangers of E3 by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    A few years back a man lost an eye at a Tony Hawk pro skater demo at E3 (someone lost controll of a skateboard and he caught it right in the cornea).

    Its all fun and games until somebody looses and eye, or gets repeated cavitie searches.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  22. Re:france... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously, america needs a humility lesson...

    Not as much as you need a grammar lesson.

  23. It's no big news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stuff like that has happened loadsa times even before all this al qaeda-iraki stuff (so that "that's a sign that terrorist won" is nonsense - usa has always been this way). some of my colleagues were caught by the guys on immigration, two were fined for 500$ (eight years ago) and one was handcuffed, sent to an hotel for the night and sent back to italy (five or four years ago). it's the law and everybody outside the US know this, especially everybody who work in the press. my opinion is that those french guys were simply n00bs who tought that press=can do anything, next time they'll be smart enough to gather infos on the country they're visiting.

    on my part, each time I come to the immigration for E3 I simply state that I'm here on businness, I'm here to see the show and no, I'm not a journalist. saves me a lot of hassles.

  24. Work Visa? by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I've always thought that the work visa was necessary to work in a USA job. Why would they need one instead of a tourist visa if they are working for their publisher in Europe?

    --
    Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
  25. Excellent article on gaming & immigration law by yem · · Score: 1

    http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20030425/rose_01 .shtml
    (you may need a Gamasutra account, but its worth it).

    --
    No, I did not read the f***ing article!
  26. Visa - Don't leave home without it by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1
    The Reporters Without Borders press release makes a big deal about how they were strip searched, put in a cell, etc. Guess what? That's standard procedure for anyone without the right visa to enter the country. I'm actually a bit more disturbed that the visa policy wasn't strictly inforced lending to more confusion.

    So when you read an article about this incident, it really boils down to this quote I found by Alison Wood: "I also hope that E3 organisers, the Interactive Digital Software Association, take steps to ensure that in future they inform all international journalists what documentation is actually required to enter America as a journalist. It seems all this could've so easily been avoided if it had been made clear that entering the States, on the visa waiver program, as a journalist, is not permitted." [BTW, this happened in Atlanta as well a few years ago.]

    There are bigger problems than journalists being detained for a few days. I wrote an article the other day that focuses on the ethics that some game publications and websites use in their reports. I'd rather a reporter go on a junket and be detained for the right reasons, than have have the reporter go on a junket and be influenced for the wrong ones.

  27. Read the paperwork 'old chap' by malakai · · Score: 1
    Typical slashdot reaction. All the lefties come flying out of their coffee shops shouting about how the end is nigh, 1984 is here, the Government has gone to the darkside... yada yada yada.

    Yet in the same breath, on the next article these same people will shout how the borders are still not secure, how Homeland Security is doing nothing. How airport security and immigration services are morons.

    Yet they do their job, by the book, and people gasp that they are some militia of Bush that's been indoctrine to hate France or some bullshit.

    They are doing their job, by the book. Is this a result of terrorism in the US? Yeah, i would hope things are much more strict these days.

    THIS WOULD BE A STORY IF THE MORON JOURNALIST COULD NOT GET PRESS VISAS!

    Instead it's a non story because they didn't even try, and complained when our border security rightly bitchslapped them back to France.

    Here's the deal on the waiver's too:
    The journalists tried to enter the country under a visa waiver program that allows citizens of 27 friendly countries to visit the United States for up to 90 days on business and pleasure. But the journalists lacked special press visas that have been required for several years, Arcaute said.

    A Homeland Security spokesman said yesterday that U.S. visa waivers applying to tourists and business travelers from 27 countries, including France, specifically exempt working foreign journalists, who must have visas. The spokesman said that handcuffing the expelled travelers during transport to a detention facility until they can be put on the next flight home was standard operating procedure.

    Similar incidents took place long before the current bilateral difficulties, Loiseau said. Although temporary arrangements have sometimes been made for visa-less travelers at other U.S. entry points, she said, Los Angeles has always been "particularly difficult."


    -Malakai
  28. I see through this by HopeUnknown · · Score: 1

    Nice try, Virus1984...or should I say, Mr. HUSSEIN????

  29. Time to move the E3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's time to move the E3 to a different country... I'd say Canada, but I'm biased.

    Seriously... isn't it a bit stupid to make an issue about foreign journalists reporting on events within the US back to their home countries (especially "friendly" countries). Their employers are outside of the US... they are not taking precious American jobs. They weren't trying to conceal their idenities... they were up front about what they were in the US to do. Unless you're trying to limit foreign coverage on events within the US... E3 today, what next tomorrow? I guess we'll have to make do with CNN.

    Bah, one more reason to not travel to the US... yep, the terrorists won after all.

  30. Oops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all just a big misunderstanding. This is really just a promotional tie-in to GTA: Vice City.

  31. oh crud by dbretton · · Score: 1

    oops.

  32. security council powers by betsywetsy · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the other veto holders might do (maybe China), but the US already ignores the UN when necessary, we'd probably walk away altogether if deprived of our veto.

    It's still unfair for 5 countries to have the veto, but I don't think it's a flaw, because I don't think making controversial decisions is or should be in the UN's mission.

    The UN serves best as a forum for debates and to pool the resources of the member nations in achieving a widely supported goal. It's not supposed to be a world government that _decides_ things. This should be clear from the fact that it has no means to enforce its decisions.

    On Iraq, we went the UN, we debated, we compromised a bit in hopes of getting other nations to help out with the bill, and then we did what we were going to do anyway. I'd say the UN served its (limited) purpose pretty well.