Slashdot Mirror


Mastering Light

thyristor writes "'Researchers at MIT document the ultimate control over light: a way to shift the frequency of light beams to any desired colour, with near 100 per cent efficiency. This technology could revolutionise a range of fields, from turning heat into light, or even into prized terahertz rays - which hold great promise for medical imaging. It could also make it possible to focus a wide range of frequencies into a narrow band, make devices such as light bulbs and solar cells more efficient, and help to keep optical telecommunications networks moving.' These are probably the most exciting results in photonics in the last decade."

21 of 415 comments (clear)

  1. See outside the bubble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, with this, could we look at Ultraviolet radiation with the naked eye (through a converter)? That would be cool!
    Being able to see infrared radiation would help a lot for playing hide and seek in the dark :).

    1. Re:See outside the bubble? by Marillion · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Infrared is not a single color. It is a range of colors. The warmer something is the closer it gets to a visible color. Incandesant Light bulbs get so warm they become visible. The also continue to emit hugh amounts of infrared - in fact, the emit more infrared than visible.

      I interpreted the article to say that they shift light like a audio pitch shifter may change the key of a song to be more conducive to a singers natural range. Cooler objects would be, say, red and warmer objects would look oranger.

      If this has the efficiency they claim, you could get more visible light out of a standard light bulb. This would save energy.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    2. Re:See outside the bubble? by prmths · · Score: 4, Interesting

      not just that.. i BET that with this technology.. MAYBE ... JUST MAYBE they'll find a way to prove the unified force theory... if they can shift an EM feild enough so that it behaves like gravity, or vica-versa (assuming the theory is true)
      that would truly be staggering... It could change everything...

      How about the possible implications in fusion or anti-matter research? bumping up the frequency of light enough to have the frequency of the light alone manipulate the atoms...

      or even wilder... zero point fields? those theories are out there too... -- being able to harness EM fields so high frequency... we cant' detect 'em.. though we could tap into 'em by scaling 'em down to such a degree where they're useful...

      truly exciting..

  2. For how long? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reading the article it seems that the light frequency is altered for only a short time, the time during which the shock wave passes through the crystal. So I don't think it's some magic filter where you can shine a green light in one end and get red light out the other. In the long term the number of peaks and troughs you put in at one end must equal the number seen at the other, so you can't consistently alter the frequency of a light beam in this way.

    IANAP, anyone care to provide more detail than seen in the article? Will the planned demonstration of the work give results observable to the human eye?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:For how long? by IsaacW · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The article states that shifting red light up in frequency to blue light takes about 10,000 reflections (about 0.1 nanoseconds). I think that you could shift a pulsed light source in this manner:
      1. Generate low-frequency (LF) pulse travelling into crystal.
      2. Apply shock wave to turn crystal into frequency shifter.
      3. Wait until LF pulse is shifted to higher frequency and emitted from crystal.
      4. Allow time for crystal to relax to original properties by allowing the shock wave to dissipate.
      5. Repeat for as long as necessary/desired.
      Now, this may or may not create any really usable stream of pulses, but I believe that you would be able to shine a (pulsed) red light in and get a (pulsed) blue light out. Whether the pulsing could be controlled sufficiently to prove useful in optical switching or other applications is yet to be shown.

      As for the number of wavecycles being equal, I wonder if this is already observed. It would make sense (if the number of wavecycles is conserved) that the resulting higher frequency pulse would be shorter in duration than the incoming lower frequency pulse, due to the relation among the speed of light/frequency of light/duration of pulse.
    2. Re:For how long? by Polaris · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reading the article it seems that the light frequency is altered for only a short time, the time during which the shock wave passes through the crystal
      No, the shock wave passing through the crystal causes the "hall of mirrors" effect with a moving mirror (the compressed/uncompressed interface) which produces a Doppler shift.

      So I don't think it's some magic filter where you can shine a green light in one end and get red light out the other
      That's exactly what it is.

      In the long term the number of peaks and troughs you put in at one end must equal the number seen at the other, so you can't consistently alter the frequency of a light beam in this way.
      Number is not frequency: you could still see the same number at a lower or higher frequency, the total observation would just take a longer or shorter time. The red shift of the light of galaxies apparently receding from us at a high fraction of c is a consistent feature, caused by exactly the same Doppler effect.

    3. Re:For how long? by aug24 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      IANAP, but I am a Physics grad, so...

      Reading the article it seems that the light frequency is altered for only a short time, the time during which the shock wave passes through the crystal.

      So you put through another shock wave and another and another and another...

      You will get the same number of peaks and troughs out, but those that have bounced back and forth a bit (and thus got Doppler shifted) will come out later, having travelled further, and shifted. This technique stretches the light pulse.

      So, (asciiart time!) you could put in pulses of green and get out continuous red:

      S S S S
      gggg gggg gggg gggg
      rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

      [View it in a fixed-width font, it'll make sense I promise]

      Each green pulse g has been stretched by the shockwave sent at each S and turned to red light r, filling the time for pulse + gap.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    4. Re:For how long? by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The trick is to let it bounce of a shock wave, not a continous wave. You simple let the light escape when it has the right frequency. As long as its gone while the shockwave is still going in one direction it will work.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  3. Star Trek has been completed! by bigattichouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, now, can we control the "shift" from software? which a real explaination for how StarTrek does those "lets generate a xMhz pulse" sorts of things... sending hailing signals over arbitrary frequencies. (like if you had an array of these devices tuned to different freq.). Also, (boy the nerd in me loves this), it generates ideas for reception.. tuning all sorts of frequencies into a standard freq (like for SETI searches....)... wow, neat idea folks.

    --
    meh
  4. Heat - energy by sonofagunn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they could shift heat waves -> light waves, then absorb those with photovoltaic cells, we could harness lots of wasted energy. Almost everything generates wasted heat energy, and isn't heat energy basically the same thing as light waves, just at a different frequency?

  5. Invisibility possible now? by kristoferkarlsson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, does this mean we can make ourselves invisible? If we would make a suit of frequency shifters we could make the visible light turn into radio waves, let them pass through the body, and then change them back into visible light. Of course, it would require huge amounts of energy aswell as precision, so it probablly won't happen anytime soon. Interesting thought, though.

  6. Can anyone say cloaking devices ? by Walts · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, with such a frequency translator, we can all imagine all the goodies and baddies that can be made with it. One of them is a cloaking devices, efficient power sources, phase weapons...
    Imagine changing harmless light from light bulbs into a focused gamma rays or worse !

    1. Re:Can anyone say cloaking devices ? by biawak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even though it could change the "harmless" light into "dangerous" light, it would be that effective as a weapon for small amounts of energy. 100% efficiency doesn't mean same number of photons but the same amount of energy. So the light coming out in the form of gamma rays would have more energy per photon but a less concentrated beam of photons and would thus not be an effective weapon.

    2. Re:Can anyone say cloaking devices ? by Walts · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps, but imagine for a moment that the beam can be translated and well as focused. Then it's doesn't really matter... Take for example all the energy of a 250 watts light bulb and focus it into say a some extremely narrow band. It's quite reasonable to get enough energy to be able blast things... Not only that, but we know that such a narrow band can be used to disable equipment as well as people by over loading them with the resulting narrow band pulse or beam...

  7. Doesn't matter, it's more than long enough by Morgaine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the light frequency is altered for only a short time

    The "short time" doesn't really matter, and furthermore looking at a "light beam" as an end-to-end continuous sine wave that you stretch and compress doesn't really help here ...

    Photons last forever (well, until absorbed etc). Once one has escaped from the reflection zone between shockwave fronts, it doesn't wither and die, it's permanently changed to do our beckoning. The fact that its "home of origin" has since moved on isn't really of any further concern. (And notice the difference in velocities between light and shock wavefronts, ie. hare and tortoise, so from the photon's point of view the generator is pretty static.)

    Complaining that the shockwave fronts are transitory is like complaining that the metastable states in lasers are, er ... metastable. :-) It doesn't matter, the point is that the wavefronts are recreated continuously, and with sound that doesn't seem all that hard.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  8. RE: The future of...*Everything*!?! by fshalor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is by far one of the most pivital breakthroughs I've seen in a while. Makes me want to fire up our lasers and start playing...However, they haven't accomplished this yet..

    "We ought to be able to do things that have never been possible before," Joannopoulos. While this is true, its application remains to be seen. I'll wait with held breath for their publication.

    On the same note, I wounder wheather this is just the begining of similar earth shattering (whell, light bending in this case) breakthroughs in other fields due to bringing ideas of two different fields together. Most optics people I know would never even consider bringing sound into the picture.

    My prediction: new sight and smell techniques will revolutionze the way scientists do research by allowing for instantaneous point density determinations in complex 3-d flows. (Extremely useful!) This will happen when this advacment using sound to modify crystal properties is coupled with a device that picks up minute particle changes over a surface (smell) and correlates the two internally.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  9. Re:new technique for displays? by Troed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Uhm, it wouldn't mess up anything. A 1280*1024 colourdisplay is essentially a 3840*1024 "monochrome"-display (each R,G,B being separate elements). If you wouldn't need separate elements, you'd have a true 3840*1024 colour display, which would be vastly superiour to sub pixel rendering .. :)

  10. Re:new technique for displays? by harrkev · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I flat panel displays will no longer need separate reg, green and blue pixels. They could just have uniform pixels which could produce light in any shade required. Should be good for higher resolution displays, greater colour depth. But might mess up things like sub pixel rendering.

    Ummm... How would you get white (red, green, and blue at the same time)? I suppose that you COULD rapidly switch between multiple frequencies to get a simulated white, but the article did not explain how much control you could get over the process... Perhaps a single crystal would only provide a fixed shift (red->blue), and if you wanted red->green, you use a different crystal.

    Also, each pixel would need its own crystal and "hammer" (probably a piezo element). This would probably be even more expensive than current flat-screen televisions.

    Just one more note -- if you have little crystals being hit at 60Hz (assuming a progressive scan display), that sucker would humm like crazy!

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  11. Re:CPU cooling? by Loosewire · · Score: 3, Interesting

    how cool - finally we can have computers full of flashing lights Just like in the movies...

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  12. Something is bugging me by neirboj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IANAP[hysicist], and so I have some questions about this process.

    What I know:

    So, when light is converted to a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) where does the necessary energy come from? The shockwave? What about when it is converted to a lower frequency (longer wavelength)? Where does the excess energy go? If the conversion really is 100% efficient (I'm a bit skeptical of that claim), then just imagine the solar panels we could have; sucking up all the UV raining down on us and emitting a soft red glow.

    Fascinating stuff. I've got to study more optics and electromagnetic physics.

  13. Re:More to the point... by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does this mean we'll finally be able to get X-Ray specs?

    Sure, if you shift the frequency down far enough. Problem is, you would only be able to see the world in x-rays. And lemme tell you, it's pretty dark at that end of the spectrum. The atmosphere filters out most of the higher-range radiation (a few dozen kilometers of air is about as effective as 8 centimeters of solid lead), which is why x-ray machines are all about the generation of radiation; seeing it on film the easy part.

    If you want comic-book style x-ray specs, then we're talking about short microwave and far-infrared radiation. Then you just shift the radiation back up into the visible spectrum and you can see through clothes, flesh, fairly un-dense stuff like that.

    --
    Dyolf Knip