Slashdot Mirror


Mastering Light

thyristor writes "'Researchers at MIT document the ultimate control over light: a way to shift the frequency of light beams to any desired colour, with near 100 per cent efficiency. This technology could revolutionise a range of fields, from turning heat into light, or even into prized terahertz rays - which hold great promise for medical imaging. It could also make it possible to focus a wide range of frequencies into a narrow band, make devices such as light bulbs and solar cells more efficient, and help to keep optical telecommunications networks moving.' These are probably the most exciting results in photonics in the last decade."

102 of 415 comments (clear)

  1. Skimpy article. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will someone else shed more light into the matter???

  2. I can't wait... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    for the next-generation laser pointers!

    1. Re:I can't wait... by romit_icarus · · Score: 5, Funny

      stop making light of real progress

    2. Re:I can't wait... by BabyDave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop please, that joke really Hertz!

      [sound of tumbleweed]

      I'll get my coat.

    3. Re:I can't wait... by Randolpho · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not the joke, it's the frequency of them.

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    4. Re:I can't wait... by daerhu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      laser pointers? hell, i can't wait for the next-generation light sabers!

    5. Re:I can't wait... by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I make a pun too, do I have to walk the Planck?

    6. Re:I can't wait... by WeeLad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, puns are bohring

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    7. Re:I can't wait... by big_gibbon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really? They make me beam

    8. Re:I can't wait... by V_drive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [comic book guy voice]
      "worst thread EVER"

      --
      char *mySig;
    9. Re:I can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, that's exacty what industry is going to do; they will create light sabers so you and your little dork friends can go cut each other in half in some semi-drunk star wars orgy.

    10. Re:I can't wait... by OneMusketeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think that covered the spectrum.

      --
      -- To airer is humen
    11. Re:I can't wait... by Shoggoth+of+Maul · · Score: 2, Funny

      Especially since lightsabers that cut with electromagnetic radiations would just pass right through each other, right?

      I'd be like fighting with a flashlight. Although, it would promote a certain degree of finesse in swordsmanship; if you couldn't parry, would you just rush up to someone, the way medieval enthusiasts do when they know they can't get their feet chopped off? It would take some serious finesse to win a fight like that...or a longer lightsaber :/.

    12. Re:I can't wait... by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, that obviously gives a spin to the whole subject!

      --
      ^_^
    13. Re:I can't wait... by redfood · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least none of the joke were off color.

  3. See outside the bubble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, with this, could we look at Ultraviolet radiation with the naked eye (through a converter)? That would be cool!
    Being able to see infrared radiation would help a lot for playing hide and seek in the dark :).

    1. Re:See outside the bubble? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      have you ever looked through a Hoya R72 infrared filter, or a B+W 58ES 403 ultraviolet-transmitting filter?

    2. Re:See outside the bubble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not an expert on light frequencies, but those are photography filters, and when you look through the IR filter for example, you see everything in dark red, except that the surfaces which reflect IR are brighter. The eye cannot see pure IR, but it can perceive the near-infrared. Looks cool in any case. Same for the UVX filter, except you see more colors, ie flowers almost glow in contrast with the rest of the scenery.

    3. Re:See outside the bubble? by interiot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      AFAIK, infrared filters simply block all visible light, and assume that the film/CCD/cornea behind it will be slightly sensitive to infrared light. This assumption is true, but (other than infrared film) those sensors aren't very sensitive to infrared so the image will be very dim, so you either have to look at the sun, or use long exposure times for the camera.

      If instead there was a filter that converted infrared light to visible light completely, then the sensors would be much much more sensitive to it and viewing normal things with your eyeball would be very practical.

    4. Re:See outside the bubble? by esonik · · Score: 5, Informative

      converters IR->visible are widely known: night vision goggles.

      converters UV->visible do also exist and are commercially available, they are not as common because they do not have so many applications (one of them is to detect corona discharge in high voltage applications, power lines). They use a stack of a photocathode (UV light->electrons), Micro Channel Plates (amplification) and a Phosphor Screen (electrons->visible light).

    5. Re:See outside the bubble? by Marillion · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Infrared is not a single color. It is a range of colors. The warmer something is the closer it gets to a visible color. Incandesant Light bulbs get so warm they become visible. The also continue to emit hugh amounts of infrared - in fact, the emit more infrared than visible.

      I interpreted the article to say that they shift light like a audio pitch shifter may change the key of a song to be more conducive to a singers natural range. Cooler objects would be, say, red and warmer objects would look oranger.

      If this has the efficiency they claim, you could get more visible light out of a standard light bulb. This would save energy.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    6. Re:See outside the bubble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, past a frequency threshold, there is no "color". Instruments that enable us to view past this threshold have to be programmed to display abritrarily selected colors for the various infrared frequencies. One example is Kodak's EIR slide film (Ektachrome InfraRed). On the package it says "false color infrared slide film".

    7. Re:See outside the bubble? by kevlar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, this isn't true. IR Filters FILTER Infrared light, preventing it from impacting the underlying CCD. All CCD and CMOS cameras have them. When removed, you can pick up an enormous amount of noise, including clicks from your remote control, which easily overflow the hit count on the chip and spam the resulting photo.

    8. Re:See outside the bubble? by cev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Infrared-pass filters transmit IR light and absorb all visible light. Silicon CCDs (all commercial digital cameras use silicon) have a peak response in the near IR, so you can get a very bright image through the IR filter. The problem is that color digital CCDs have color filters on them which block IR light.

    9. Re:See outside the bubble? by prmths · · Score: 4, Interesting

      not just that.. i BET that with this technology.. MAYBE ... JUST MAYBE they'll find a way to prove the unified force theory... if they can shift an EM feild enough so that it behaves like gravity, or vica-versa (assuming the theory is true)
      that would truly be staggering... It could change everything...

      How about the possible implications in fusion or anti-matter research? bumping up the frequency of light enough to have the frequency of the light alone manipulate the atoms...

      or even wilder... zero point fields? those theories are out there too... -- being able to harness EM fields so high frequency... we cant' detect 'em.. though we could tap into 'em by scaling 'em down to such a degree where they're useful...

      truly exciting..

    10. Re:See outside the bubble? by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Infrared is not a single color. It is a range of colors. The warmer something is the closer it gets to a visible color.
      I think you are confusing the infrared spectrum with the concept of color temperature. The idea of color temperature arises naturally from blackbody radiation--as a blackbody radiator gets hotter, its peak emission wavelength gets shorter. If it's hot enough, it picks up a distinctive color (for example, blackbodies look red around 3000 Kelvin, IIRC, and yellow around 6000 Kelvin). It does not mean that the infrared spectrum suddenly becomes visible to the unaided human eye, it just means that the blackbody is now radiating visible wavelengths strongly enough that the eye can see them. The infrared spectrum is completely decoupled from the concept of color because, by definition, the infrared spectrum consists of wavelengths too long to be seen by the unaided eye.
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    11. Re:See outside the bubble? by erwass · · Score: 2, Informative

      Woah there nellie. Your talking about shifting electromagnetic radiation up to energies where its wavelength is of the order of the Planck length (10^-35 meters, where the EM and gravitational fields might be unified). Puhleez. No way with this technology which is basically made of stuff whose characteristic distances if of order 10^-10 m. Don't get me wrong this stuff is really nifty but this is just way overselling it.

  4. Summary Of Technique by N8F8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Playing pong with lightwaves.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  5. For how long? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reading the article it seems that the light frequency is altered for only a short time, the time during which the shock wave passes through the crystal. So I don't think it's some magic filter where you can shine a green light in one end and get red light out the other. In the long term the number of peaks and troughs you put in at one end must equal the number seen at the other, so you can't consistently alter the frequency of a light beam in this way.

    IANAP, anyone care to provide more detail than seen in the article? Will the planned demonstration of the work give results observable to the human eye?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:For how long? by Becquerel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The magic filter is exactly what the article suggests, but I can't see how it works.

      It seems to suggest that "Because the shock wave is moving through the crystal, the light gets Doppler shifted each time it bounces off it" But surely it gets shifted up when it hits the approaching wave and down again when it hits the retreating one. It would have to continously bounce off approaching or retreating waves in order to get shifted up or down. Maybe they use some kind of concentric shockwaves, but even then it would have to pass through retreating waves unaffected in order to hit another approaching one.

      I also can't get my head round how you would shift the frequency without moving the source at near to the speed of light. Anyone got any ideas?

      --
      My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
    2. Re:For how long? by IsaacW · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The article states that shifting red light up in frequency to blue light takes about 10,000 reflections (about 0.1 nanoseconds). I think that you could shift a pulsed light source in this manner:
      1. Generate low-frequency (LF) pulse travelling into crystal.
      2. Apply shock wave to turn crystal into frequency shifter.
      3. Wait until LF pulse is shifted to higher frequency and emitted from crystal.
      4. Allow time for crystal to relax to original properties by allowing the shock wave to dissipate.
      5. Repeat for as long as necessary/desired.
      Now, this may or may not create any really usable stream of pulses, but I believe that you would be able to shine a (pulsed) red light in and get a (pulsed) blue light out. Whether the pulsing could be controlled sufficiently to prove useful in optical switching or other applications is yet to be shown.

      As for the number of wavecycles being equal, I wonder if this is already observed. It would make sense (if the number of wavecycles is conserved) that the resulting higher frequency pulse would be shorter in duration than the incoming lower frequency pulse, due to the relation among the speed of light/frequency of light/duration of pulse.
    3. Re:For how long? by Polaris · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reading the article it seems that the light frequency is altered for only a short time, the time during which the shock wave passes through the crystal
      No, the shock wave passing through the crystal causes the "hall of mirrors" effect with a moving mirror (the compressed/uncompressed interface) which produces a Doppler shift.

      So I don't think it's some magic filter where you can shine a green light in one end and get red light out the other
      That's exactly what it is.

      In the long term the number of peaks and troughs you put in at one end must equal the number seen at the other, so you can't consistently alter the frequency of a light beam in this way.
      Number is not frequency: you could still see the same number at a lower or higher frequency, the total observation would just take a longer or shorter time. The red shift of the light of galaxies apparently receding from us at a high fraction of c is a consistent feature, caused by exactly the same Doppler effect.

    4. Re:For how long? by aug24 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      IANAP, but I am a Physics grad, so...

      Reading the article it seems that the light frequency is altered for only a short time, the time during which the shock wave passes through the crystal.

      So you put through another shock wave and another and another and another...

      You will get the same number of peaks and troughs out, but those that have bounced back and forth a bit (and thus got Doppler shifted) will come out later, having travelled further, and shifted. This technique stretches the light pulse.

      So, (asciiart time!) you could put in pulses of green and get out continuous red:

      S S S S
      gggg gggg gggg gggg
      rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

      [View it in a fixed-width font, it'll make sense I promise]

      Each green pulse g has been stretched by the shockwave sent at each S and turned to red light r, filling the time for pulse + gap.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    5. Re:For how long? by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The trick is to let it bounce of a shock wave, not a continous wave. You simple let the light escape when it has the right frequency. As long as its gone while the shockwave is still going in one direction it will work.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    6. Re:For how long? by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Informative
      It sounds like you get bursts of upward conversion and downward conversion, as the conversion is done by the movement of the reflective surface. So upward conversion happens while moving toward the light, but as the mirror moves away to its starting point there will be downward conversion. So you'd get a beam with bursts of red shift and blue shift taking place, but the "wrong color" will be blocked from coming out. This color filter is what makes it different from a simple moving mirror. For constant conversion you'd have to use several devices and switch between them at appropriate times, or several running in parallel with the pulsed beams being combined.

      The energy for conversion comes from the shock wave, the light is merely bouncing between reflective surfaces as it does in a laser. In a laser, usually all the lasing light is in a single frequency. A laser normally works by using a weak mirror, and the color is whatever is inside the laser (some laser mirrors simply use a hole for the beam, which is an interesting way of having a "weak" mirror). This device instead uses a color-sensitive mirror to let the light out when it reaches the correct color.

      I do have respect for the design and engineering of an experiment which will involve bullets as a mechanism. Sometimes brute force is the simplest way to test something, such as when the question is "Is it unbreakable?" versus "How strong is it?".

    7. Re:For how long? by str1chn1n3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The unaltered 'band-gap' crystal structure traps some quantum energy states and lets others pass through. When a shockwave meets the crystal, the traversing wave is momentarily 'held-up' if the shockwave is travelling in the opposite direction or 'hastened' if the shockwave is travelling in the same direction, thereby compressing or stretching the frequency. Since 'band-gap' crystals apply to all waves and not just photonic, this same method can be applied to sound and heat waves as well. Check this excellent Wired article for more. This whole field is really elegant.

      --
      RICERCAR
    8. Re:For how long? by aug24 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Firstly, a photon will bounce off the material boundaries within the crystal forever unless it has the frequency we want.

      Assuming the pressure wave is reversed (ie the crystal doesn't explode), then yes the light will be doppler shifted the other way if it hits the rebounding boundary.

      This could be taken care of by careful timing, although it might limit the range of practical shifts.

      But who cares about practice! I was always a theoretician - didn't like getting my hands dirty with real photons ;-)

      Oh, and the shift will occur whatever the speed is, it'll just be a smaller shift for a slower boundary.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    9. Re:For how long? by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder if large frequency shifts towards higher frequencies would require a substantial energy input to power the shock wave? If you put in 50 photons at frequency x and get out 50 at freq x+n, you have to put energy into the system. Likewise if you downshift in frequency you must be releasing energy - perhaps the shock wave could become self-sustaining? This still could be useful for power-generation - most photovoltaics have optimum absorbtion frequencies, and a lot of work probably goes into broadening the effective range. With this technology we could steer all our effort into making a cell which was REALLY efficient but at a very narrow range of wavelengths. Then we could convert the incident light completely into this wavelength. Even if we have to kick some energy back into the shock waves it should be more than compensated by the efficiency increase, and if we get very high efficiency wasting a little energy won't matter since presumably most of it will be coming from the sun.

  6. Star Trek has been completed! by bigattichouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, now, can we control the "shift" from software? which a real explaination for how StarTrek does those "lets generate a xMhz pulse" sorts of things... sending hailing signals over arbitrary frequencies. (like if you had an array of these devices tuned to different freq.). Also, (boy the nerd in me loves this), it generates ideas for reception.. tuning all sorts of frequencies into a standard freq (like for SETI searches....)... wow, neat idea folks.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Star Trek has been completed! by alchemist68 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I disagree with "Star Trek has been completed!"

      Star Trek will NOT be complete until we have discovered how the Klingons and Romulans make their CLOAKING DEVICES. And while we're at it, I wish Zephram Cochran would hurry up and be born so he can invent the Warp Drive. You know, I thought we almost had the Warp Drive with Asymetical Capacitors, but others here on Slashdot have pointed out that they don't work in a vacuum. One more thing, we need Transporters to beam down to other planets from orbit. We're a long way from Star Trek.

    2. Re:Star Trek has been completed! by HermanZA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the superheterodyne radio is not exactly new you know. It's been used for almost 100 years now...

  7. Innovative group by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 5, Informative

    Joannopolous was also involved in the development of the "perfect" dielectric mirror, which was mentioned here before.

  8. Heat - energy by sonofagunn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they could shift heat waves -> light waves, then absorb those with photovoltaic cells, we could harness lots of wasted energy. Almost everything generates wasted heat energy, and isn't heat energy basically the same thing as light waves, just at a different frequency?

    1. Re:Heat - energy by FamousLongAgo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh, what exactly is a 'heat wave'?

      Heat comes in two flavors - radiated light waves and random molecular motion. The second kind is irrelevant to this discussion. As far as the first kind goes, you can't magically make that radiated light have more energy by converting it up to a higher frequency.

      The laws of conversation of energy and thermodynamics would like to have a little word with you out back...

      --

      A customer service representative will be with me shortly.
    2. Re:Heat - energy by Spunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, what exactly is a 'heat wave'?

      Three consecutive days with temperatures of 90 degrees (F) or above.

    3. Re:Heat - energy by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The heat energy you are thinking of being the same as light waves but at a different frequency is near infrared radiation (or actual infrared radiation) and it is, in fact, light.

      There are two ways things radiate heat, as another poster points out; One is by losing its heat energy to neighboring substances, thus exciting them and becoming less excited. The other is through near-infrared radiation.

      Things which absorb IR are heated by it, and things which reflect IR are not. Most things are somewhere in between, reflecting a percentage of IR. In a vacuum you can't cool by convection for example so you paint one side reflective and insulated and the other side black and noninsulated and control temperature by rotating; The black side will radiate in the near-infrared and provide (slow) cooling. I have no idea why black surfaces radiate more heat, surely someone will explain it to me someday. Or soon.

      So heat itself cannot be converted. IR can be converted, but most loss of heat in terrestrial (or other environmental) systems is not due to infrared radiation. Heat energy is essentially kinetic energy on a very fine scale, whereas developing energy from light involves photons knocking around electrons.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. All one frequency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I call it a "laser"....

  10. Invisibility possible now? by kristoferkarlsson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, does this mean we can make ourselves invisible? If we would make a suit of frequency shifters we could make the visible light turn into radio waves, let them pass through the body, and then change them back into visible light. Of course, it would require huge amounts of energy aswell as precision, so it probablly won't happen anytime soon. Interesting thought, though.

    1. Re:Invisibility possible now? by aug24 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What an excellent thought!

      The difficulty would be to get the shock waves going in the direction of light for all directions or light!

      That doesn't mean it can't/won't be managed though.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  11. I can imagine by Apreche · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An optical router. An incredible array of lenses and lasers and "light controllers". It would take up an entire room and be a dust free vacuum. It would be so awesome, not to mention cool looking.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  12. DJs! by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This would actually be pretty cool for the average DJ or night club, since traditional filters are so inefficient, and thus cause you to use higher wattage light, and more heat (and more AC to deal with it). This could make club lighting more attractive, more sophisticated and more varied.

    After all, if science can't help drunk/horny/single people get laid, what good is it? :-)

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:DJs! by MonkeyMagic · · Score: 5, Funny

      After all, if science can't help drunk/horny/single people get laid, what good is it? :-)

      Only on Slashdot would this be moderated "insightful" rather than "funny".

  13. Re:Rather skimpy article. by mblase · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can someone in the audience shed more light into the matter?

    No doubt it'll become more transparent as Slashdot editors repost it with increasing frequency.

  14. new technique for displays? by EddWo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I flat panel displays will no longer need separate reg, green and blue pixels. They could just have uniform pixels which could produce light in any shade required. Should be good for higher resolution displays, greater colour depth. But might mess up things like sub pixel rendering.

    http://grc.com/cleartype.htm

    --
    "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    1. Re:new technique for displays? by Troed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uhm, it wouldn't mess up anything. A 1280*1024 colourdisplay is essentially a 3840*1024 "monochrome"-display (each R,G,B being separate elements). If you wouldn't need separate elements, you'd have a true 3840*1024 colour display, which would be vastly superiour to sub pixel rendering .. :)

    2. Re:new technique for displays? by harrkev · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I flat panel displays will no longer need separate reg, green and blue pixels. They could just have uniform pixels which could produce light in any shade required. Should be good for higher resolution displays, greater colour depth. But might mess up things like sub pixel rendering.

      Ummm... How would you get white (red, green, and blue at the same time)? I suppose that you COULD rapidly switch between multiple frequencies to get a simulated white, but the article did not explain how much control you could get over the process... Perhaps a single crystal would only provide a fixed shift (red->blue), and if you wanted red->green, you use a different crystal.

      Also, each pixel would need its own crystal and "hammer" (probably a piezo element). This would probably be even more expensive than current flat-screen televisions.

      Just one more note -- if you have little crystals being hit at 60Hz (assuming a progressive scan display), that sucker would humm like crazy!

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  15. Photonic Condensator? by stiller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The researchers worked out that if a photonic crystal is designed in a certain way, incoming light can get trapped at the shock wave boundary, bouncing back and forth between the compressed part of the crystal and the uncompressed part, in a "hall of mirrors" effect.

    Could this be the starting point for some sort of photonic condensator? Maybe, this could in turn be used for building a volatile photonic memory system?
    That would mean a great leap in photo-electronic computer systems, since normally, a lot of the speedup from using optics in systems is lost due to slow(er) memory. But maybe the quality of the signal degrades too fast to be usable, afterall 0.1 nanosecond is hardly usable in most cases. Maybe somebody knows more about photo-electonics to figure this one out?

  16. The technology smashes the crystal by HidingMyName · · Score: 5, Informative

    The approach is destructive of the crystal used for filtering the light, although they hope to be able to use sound waves in the future. Due to the distorion of the crystal lattice structure required, even sound waves may wind up breaking the crystal (remember the old memorex commercials with the singer breaking a crystal wine glass). The approach is very interesting, but there still are some serious design issues that they need to address, otherwise, it will be tough to deploy this for applications such as optical repeaters or switches.

    1. Re:The technology smashes the crystal by kinnell · · Score: 2, Informative
      even sound waves may wind up breaking the crystal

      That's only a serious problem if they hit the resonant frequency of the crystal, or a multiple thereof. As long as they avoid this, it would have to be one serious sound wave, in which case a greater problem might be the neighbours :-)

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  17. Can anyone say cloaking devices ? by Walts · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, with such a frequency translator, we can all imagine all the goodies and baddies that can be made with it. One of them is a cloaking devices, efficient power sources, phase weapons...
    Imagine changing harmless light from light bulbs into a focused gamma rays or worse !

    1. Re:Can anyone say cloaking devices ? by biawak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even though it could change the "harmless" light into "dangerous" light, it would be that effective as a weapon for small amounts of energy. 100% efficiency doesn't mean same number of photons but the same amount of energy. So the light coming out in the form of gamma rays would have more energy per photon but a less concentrated beam of photons and would thus not be an effective weapon.

    2. Re:Can anyone say cloaking devices ? by Walts · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps, but imagine for a moment that the beam can be translated and well as focused. Then it's doesn't really matter... Take for example all the energy of a 250 watts light bulb and focus it into say a some extremely narrow band. It's quite reasonable to get enough energy to be able blast things... Not only that, but we know that such a narrow band can be used to disable equipment as well as people by over loading them with the resulting narrow band pulse or beam...

    3. Re:Can anyone say cloaking devices ? by md65536 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm no physicist but I doubt that the light energy in is the same as the light energy out (I'd be more inclined to think that the number of photons remains the same). I think that the shock wave applying the Doppler effect is probably changing the energy? So, you may be able to build death rays out of ordinary "harmless" light, but you'd have to apply a lot of energy to the shockwave.

      The way I understand this system, it would be like tossing a pingpong ball into a match with a couple of mad pingpong players. The paddles, moving back and forth as a well-timed shockwave would, add energy to the ball and it is shot out of the system with higher energy than it was tossed in.

      Is this analogy accurate?

  18. Efficiency by onthefenceman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the summary's mention of "near 100% efficiency" is misleading. It all depends on how wide your definition of the system is. Yes, technically the material itself appears to be highly efficient, but that's discounting all the energy used creating the shockwave necessary to give the material these properties.

    A fascinating discovery, yes, but a miraculous way to convert energy to suit our needs it is not.

    --
    Have you seen my stapler?
    1. Re:Efficiency by geeber · · Score: 2, Informative

      The efficiency of interest in these types of processes is not the total energy efficiency. For example, if I lose heat because I have to stabalize the temperature of the crystal, I am not worried about that. What is of ultimate interest is the optical conversion effiency - the power in at wavelength one, versus the power out at desired wavelength two.

      Optical conversion efficiency is what is important, for example, in wavelength conversion for data transmission. You don't want to lose signal power.

  19. New drink mix??? by UncleBiggims · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm confused. Are you saying that MIT researchers have developed a new "Cyrstal Light" drink mix that changes colors? What flavor is it?

  20. What's the range of effect? by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd be curious to know the breadth of the effect (possibly limited to those wavelengths that can be captured by photonic crystals?). I mean, visible light is only a very small part of the EM spectrum. http://www.lbl.gov/MicroWorlds/ALSTool/EMSpec/EMSp ec2.html
    Could this effect mean one could upshift radio waves to hard xrays? Or microwaves to gamma rays? The idea that this can be done with nearly 100% efficiency is the biggest wow-factor and seems like it should be violating the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:What's the range of effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not violating the second law of thermodynamics because to do this sort of upshift requires a stress to be applied to a crystal, thus inputting energy into the system. It's just that this energy is converted into a higher frequency light ray.

    2. Re:What's the range of effect? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 'near-100% efficiency' doesn't mean that the process is energy-free, just that the light coming out is almost as intense as the light coming in. Ordinary filters don't convert anything, they just block out what you don't want. If only 10% of the emitted light is of a frequency you want, then 90% is lost by using a filter. This process actually converts the incoming light into the outgoing, so any losses are due to imperfections in the system.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  21. You know what they say about the EM spectrum... by VCAGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...shift happens!

    --
    Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
    A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  22. No article up yet, but here's the abstract by DrFlounder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not much more information than in the article, but here's the abstract. This is pretty similar to Bragg scattering, which is a well known effect that uses sound waves to upshift the frequency of light. Current Bragg cells are very inefficient and are limited to small shifts in frequency. A high efficiency Bragg cell capable of shifting frequency by a large amount would be extremely interesting.

    From Physical Review Letters.

    Color of shock waves in photonic crystals
    Evan J. Reed, Marin Soljacic, and John D. Joannopoulos

    Unexpected and stunning new physical phenomena result when light interacts with a shock wave or shock-like dielectric modulation propagating through a photonic crystal. These new phenomena include the capture of light at the shock wave front and re-emission at a tunable pulse rate and carrier frequency across the bandgap, and bandwidth narrowing as opposed to the ubiquitous bandwidth broadening. To our knowledge, these effects do not occur in any other physical system and are all realizable under experimentally accessible conditions. Furthermore, their generality make them amenable to observation in a variety of time-dependent photonic crystal systems, which has significant technological implications.

    --
    Physics, Cosmology and ... ants? Dr. Floun
  23. Doesn't matter, it's more than long enough by Morgaine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the light frequency is altered for only a short time

    The "short time" doesn't really matter, and furthermore looking at a "light beam" as an end-to-end continuous sine wave that you stretch and compress doesn't really help here ...

    Photons last forever (well, until absorbed etc). Once one has escaped from the reflection zone between shockwave fronts, it doesn't wither and die, it's permanently changed to do our beckoning. The fact that its "home of origin" has since moved on isn't really of any further concern. (And notice the difference in velocities between light and shock wavefronts, ie. hare and tortoise, so from the photon's point of view the generator is pretty static.)

    Complaining that the shockwave fronts are transitory is like complaining that the metastable states in lasers are, er ... metastable. :-) It doesn't matter, the point is that the wavefronts are recreated continuously, and with sound that doesn't seem all that hard.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  24. Cool application! by Domini · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having the ultimate sunglasses... have it shift Ultra-violet to a more visible frequency...

    Or perhaps even infrared/heat?
    Cool glasses that make you see in the dark? (military applications?)

    Whee!

    1. Re:Cool application! by untaken_name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot X-rays... Now the old gag X-ray glasses could become a reality!

      Sure, if you can manage to convice whoever you wanted to see through to walk in front of a device spewing x-rays. I don't really know what the attraction would be of seeing someone's skeleton, although it might be cool for a few minutes. It's not like you're going to see through just someone's clothes, unless they're sheer/transparent/over on the floor in the corner, and you don't need special glasses and deadly radiation for that.
      Maybe for doctors...but still, there has to be a source for the x-rays, and they're still dangerous. your eyes would be protected...but what about the rest of you?

  25. Biodegradable? by the+bluebrain · · Score: 3, Funny
    • The work is impressive, says materials chemist Michael Sailor at the University of California, San Diego, whose team has developed flexible, biodegradable photonic crystals. He says he now plans to test the phenomenon for himself.
    Sounds like they didn't manage to make crystals that actually *last*, and are attempting to sell this bug as a feature.
    Who says the physical engineering guys can't learn anything from the software guys? :)
    --
    yes, we have no bananas
  26. RE: The future of...*Everything*!?! by fshalor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is by far one of the most pivital breakthroughs I've seen in a while. Makes me want to fire up our lasers and start playing...However, they haven't accomplished this yet..

    "We ought to be able to do things that have never been possible before," Joannopoulos. While this is true, its application remains to be seen. I'll wait with held breath for their publication.

    On the same note, I wounder wheather this is just the begining of similar earth shattering (whell, light bending in this case) breakthroughs in other fields due to bringing ideas of two different fields together. Most optics people I know would never even consider bringing sound into the picture.

    My prediction: new sight and smell techniques will revolutionze the way scientists do research by allowing for instantaneous point density determinations in complex 3-d flows. (Extremely useful!) This will happen when this advacment using sound to modify crystal properties is coupled with a device that picks up minute particle changes over a surface (smell) and correlates the two internally.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  27. Does this mean by DaLiNKz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean my laser pointer will be able to hit the moon? :D

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
  28. High-efficiency automobile lighting? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm.

    This research could point the way for automotive lighting systems that are far more efficient than today's lights but use a tiny fraction of its power.

    Already, we've seen LED taillights on a number of cars such as the Nissan Skyline (as the Infiniti G35 is known in most of the world). This research could lead to LED-based automobile headlights that are just as bright as the high-intensity discharge (HID) xenon headlights found on more expensive automobiles but doesn't need the expensive power generating system HID headlights now need and uses a tiny fraction of the power needed for regular headlights. Other lighting systems such as fog lights could benefit from these new technologies, too.

  29. Re:Rather skimpy article. by spectrokid · · Score: 5, Informative

    Right now you can buy AOTF cristals. It is a bit similar, but works as a filter (Acousto Optic Tunable Filter). What it does is bend off one specific wavelength of light based on which ultrasound you beam through it. By sandwiching a AOTF crystal between a piezzo and an absorber, you get a filter which you can control with a waveform generator. Brimrose will sell you a spectrometer that can scan 16,000 wavelengths per second for a ridiculously cheap 100,000$. Downturn is it throws all other wavelengths out meaning you still need a 35 Watt halogen lightsource to measure anything. If you could "recuperate" or shift the other wavelengths then you could use LED's as a light source and have a completely solid-state spectrometer with > 30000 H MTBF. You would use less power, produce less heat, make it smaller, send it to Mars,....

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  30. Peer Review? by kravlor · · Score: 5, Informative

    This certainly sounds like an excellent advance in the field.I have been aware of interesting work with shock waves in other materials, for example, to create hydrogen metal, but it wouldn't surprise me if these claimed results were valid.

    There are a couple of problems with the article and its claims, however:

    • Near 100% efficiency -- I'd like to see a reproducable demonstration of this. If it is true, we will have a revolution in the solar cell industry. However, the Second Law of Thermodynamics is a difficult thing to contend with; anything that comes near 100% should set off any good physicist's red flags.
    • The article is going to be published in the Physical Review Letters -- This is significantly different than saying the article has been published in the PRL's. Such a journal is peer reviewed, which means that other respected scientists in the field have read and commented on the article and its methods, and endorse the results. This case, however, seems a lot like "cold fusion" -- with researchers calling a press conference before letting others reproduce their results.

    I hope for the best, but remain sceptical; let's hope these new shockwave effects become easier to generate and exploit!

    1. Re:Peer Review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with your 100% efficiency statement -- it clearly would violate the 2nd law of Thermodynamics...

      I found the news article to be a little unclear on this point: Are they talking about energy efficiency; or, conversion efficiency?

  31. Is the Photonic Revolution Coming? by rpiquepa · · Score: 4, Informative

    I also commented this story here, but I also previously posted another column on this subject. Please read it if you're interested by the photonic revolution.

  32. IAAP -- Here it is in plain English. by jgardn · · Score: 5, Informative

    IAAP (I am a Physicist) and the effect is pretty simple. I think anyone should be able to understand it if it is explained properly.

    "Doppler Shift" is a phenomena you are already familiar with. Consider a car honking its horn as he drives by at freeway speeds. As he approaches, the sound is heard at a higher frequency. As he passes by, the frequency shifts, and as he is leaving, the frequency is lower than normal.

    Light is like sound in that it is a wave and has a frequency. Let's examine light from high to low frequencies. X-Rays are light at extremely high frequencies. Ultra-Violet light is just above the visible light range. Then we get into the rainbow - blue, then green, then red. Next is infra-red light -- light just below red in frequency. Travelling farther down, we start to reach the radio band. Below that, the frequencies are so low that it no longer is light anymore, but more like a slowly shifting magnetic or electric field.

    The Doppler effect works for light as well. The problem is you or the object emanating the light has to be travelling near light speeds to see any noticeable effect. We call this "redshift" in astronomy, because stars seem to be travelling away from us, and so the light emanating from them is lower in frequency (more red). Certainly, attaining near-light-speeds is dangerous and difficult. We're not talking "bullet" fast, we are talking "cosmic ray" fast.

    However, there is an oh-so-tiny Doppler shift when *any* motion is involved with light. When your friend walks towards you, the light bouncing off of him is slightly more blue. When he walks away, it is slightly more red. Good luck actually detecting this, however.

    Photonic crystals have the strange property of behaving like a piece of glass at one moment, and a mirror the next, depending on how much pressure is applied where.

    So, using a proper push on the crystal, it is possible to set up a travelling hall of mirrors. The light appears to be slightly shifted due to the Doppler effect to the mirror, so when it is reflected, the light is shifted, by an oh-so-tiny amount. Multiply that shift by a kazillion reflections, which is quite possible if you make the hall of mirrors very tiny (think atomic scale), and you can control light to almost any frequency, high or low, depending on how you set up the mirrors.

    So, the net effect is light goes in at one frequency, and comes out the other end at another, without expending hardly any energy to get it done.

    The engineering challenge is configuring the crystal so that it can withstand the forces that need to be applied, and applying the forces in a controllable way. Right now they are doing tests with bullets and crystals, because they only need to record data for the instant that the shock waves are travelling through the crystal, and they don't mind using a cheap, destructive method. In the future, they will probably use sound waves to control the crystal. But how they configure this is left to the imagination.

    The applications are numerous, and some of them are listed in the article. Needless to say, if we want to use light to transmit data, the more control we have over the light, the more effective we can be in transmitting that data. Also, doctors will be happy because we can now easily exploit the Terahertz range for X-ray type applications.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:IAAP -- Here it is in plain English. by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps an illustration will further illuminate this. A radar gun works by bouncing radio waves off of a moving car. Since the car is moving, the doppler effect causes the reflected waves to have a different wavelength than the incident waves. The radar gun measures this difference and determines the car's speed.

      In the same way, the walls of the crystal that the light is bouncing off of are vibrating back and forth. If the vibrations are timed such that a wall is always moving towards or away from an incident photon when it strikes the photons will always be gaining or losing wavelength due to the doppler shift.

  33. Just in time... by PerspectiveTransform · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank god... now just before Zephran Cochran launches, we'll have the frequency shifting lasers we need to stop the Borg without any help.

  34. Take it easy on the hype there! by geeber · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is certainly an interesting result, but its heavily hyped as well.

    First of all, there are many many ways to shift the frequency of light, both up and down in frequency, with both linear and nonlinear means, - from the Raman effect in optical fibers (scattering off vibrations of silica molecules) to Optical Parametric Oscillators (nonlinear wave mixing), supercontinuum generation (using a multitude of nonlinear effects to generate broad bandwidth from a single laser) to simple OEO conversion (detect your light with a photodiode and use it to drive another laser at a different wavelength. Contrary to what this article implies, these effects work at modest power levels in todays optical fibers, and many are highly efficient, and work over extremely broad bandwidths. For example, supercontinuum generation can generate light sources with bandwidth covering the entire visible, UV and IR spectrum in one source! If you want to talk about bulk optic techniques for wavelength conversion, the list is even longer.

    Now think a minute about what these guys are proposing. They have to shock the crystal. Initial experiments will destroy the sample. Maybe they can refine the technique down the line to nondestructively shock the sample, maybe they can't. Certainly, infinite bandwidth won't be available, since the amount of wavelength shift will depend on the amount of shock. A single shot technique for wavelength shifting, while interesting, isn't all that useful practically.

    Second, they are using a shock, so conversion of CW light is out of the question, only pulses can be converted here, or you risk a time dependent wavelength shift, as your shock dies out.

    Finally, claims of a completely new physical effect seem somewhat overblown. It is an interesting idea, but Doppler shifting off acoustic shocks, and photonic crystals are well known. Marrying the two together and finding a stable regime of operation is novel, but not quite the same as discovering a new physical princple like relativity or quantum mechanics, for example.

  35. Re:Mod this idiot down! by hammy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, the title of my comment was a bit harsh...
    The article seems to imply that this effect will initially be temporary ("Initially they will generate shock waves by shooting bullets at photonic crystals. This would destroy the crystal, but not before the light has had time to shift.") The article implies that in the future the technique should probably be able to produce a continuous beam ("Eventually, sound waves should do the job just as well.")

  36. Re:Mod this idiot down! by geeber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I doubt this effect will work with continuous beams. The wavelength shift is based on the Doppler effect, i.e. the light shifts in frequency because the crystal is getting smaller. At some point the crystal has to get larger again, or be destroyed. If the crystal is driven by an acoustic wave, it will oscillate in size, and therefore, the frequency shift will have an oscillatory behaviour in time.

  37. You forgot the bullets... by Chemisor · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article mentions an interesting fact that the researchers are using bullets instead of sound shock waves. "That will, of course, destroy the crystal"... I can just imagine what goes on in that lab:

    "Allrighty, George, it's your turn with the gun."

    "But Bill, you know George can't hit the broad side of a barn!"

    "Nonsense, my dear fellow. We need to produce some blue light soon, and that calls for a once-in-a-blue-moon event. Come on, George; ready... aim... fire! Take the safety off first, George. Gees... you call yourself a scientist? Ready... aim... fire!"

    "Oh, no, not my brand new spectrometer!..."

    "Look... Blue light! Woooohoooo!"

  38. Re:CPU cooling? by Loosewire · · Score: 3, Interesting

    how cool - finally we can have computers full of flashing lights Just like in the movies...

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  39. Slight correction. by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We call this "redshift" in astronomy...
    Don't confuse cosmological redshift with Doppler-induced redshift. In astronomy, the redshift that's talked about is typically not due to the literal motion of the star. It really arises from the space between Earth and the star under observation expanding. It's really quite a neat little effect. I'm not going into the detail here, but I'd recommend reading a little about it.

    Anyway, because the redshift comes from the space itself expanding, it's proportional (I think it's a linear effect, I don't remember too well) to the distance between you and the object under observation. Yes, there is some Doppler style redshift, but that is not what's generally meant when an astronomer says "redshift". Also, cosmologists use redshift (z) as their primary variable in many equations. Most cosmologists measure distance in redshift, instead of cgs or mks length units.
    --


    Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
  40. Better solar power generators by Arcturax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By taking sunlight and turning it into microwave radiation, you could get far greater efficiency out of the generation of electricity.

    This would make microwave beaming satellites highly efficient. The current idea was to have huge solar arrays which would of course alter the look of the sky during the day or night. These would convert some of the light into energy and probably reflect the rest of lose it as heat. The elctricity generated would produce a microwave signal which would be beamed down to a ground station and converted back into electricity. With this new technology, they could have far smaller arrays which convert the light directly into microwaves and transmit, eliminating the overhead of going from light->electricity->microwaves->electrici ty on the ground.

    Instead you would have light->microwaves->electricity on the ground.

    And you wouldn't need a mile long array of cells to collect enough power to make it worthwhile because your effeciency would be extremely high.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  41. Actual Phenomenon (Cherenkov) and Research Paper by zhamurai · · Score: 3, Informative

    The radiation selectivity property was discovered by observing the phenomenon of Cherenkov radiation inside the photonic crystal.

    For further more detailed technical information, a PDF of the paper is here [http://physics.ucsd.edu/~drs/publications/2003/lu o_science_2003.pdf]

    Photonic crystals fall under a broader family of materials called "metamaterials".

    Future research note: Software-programmable metamaterials will create wonderfully exotic applications.

    Cheers

    Andrew

  42. More to the point... by kinnell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this mean we'll finally be able to get X-Ray specs?

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:More to the point... by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Does this mean we'll finally be able to get X-Ray specs?

      Sure, if you shift the frequency down far enough. Problem is, you would only be able to see the world in x-rays. And lemme tell you, it's pretty dark at that end of the spectrum. The atmosphere filters out most of the higher-range radiation (a few dozen kilometers of air is about as effective as 8 centimeters of solid lead), which is why x-ray machines are all about the generation of radiation; seeing it on film the easy part.

      If you want comic-book style x-ray specs, then we're talking about short microwave and far-infrared radiation. Then you just shift the radiation back up into the visible spectrum and you can see through clothes, flesh, fairly un-dense stuff like that.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  43. Most famous words in science by ca1v1n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Huh, that's not supposed to happen..."

  44. Something is bugging me by neirboj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IANAP[hysicist], and so I have some questions about this process.

    What I know:

    So, when light is converted to a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) where does the necessary energy come from? The shockwave? What about when it is converted to a lower frequency (longer wavelength)? Where does the excess energy go? If the conversion really is 100% efficient (I'm a bit skeptical of that claim), then just imagine the solar panels we could have; sucking up all the UV raining down on us and emitting a soft red glow.

    Fascinating stuff. I've got to study more optics and electromagnetic physics.

    1. Re:Something is bugging me by mankei · · Score: 2, Informative

      The energy indeed comes from the shock wave. When light is shifted from a lower frequency to a higher frequency, a photon with the lower frequency f1 and an acoustic phonon with the frequency f2 are annihiliated and a new photon with the high frequency f1 + f2 is created. Energy is conserved. This is called stimulated Brillouin scattering. I suspect that the mechanism suggested in the article is a multi-phonon process because usually acoustic waves do not have such high optical frequencies. So multiple phonons are annihiliated in multiple bounces to generate a significant frequency shift.

  45. Neat! by retro128 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Initially they will generate shock waves by shooting bullets at photonic crystals.

    Who says science isn't fun?

    --
    -R
  46. 6th Column by atwtftg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this remind anyone else of the Ledbetter effect that Heinlein described in his "Sixth Column" novella?

    Seems like there was another Heinlein story that used a light wavelength shifter as an energy resource - one that ultimately powered moving sidewalks...anyone remember the title of that story?

  47. Bohring maybe, but... by Iowaguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    But they do occur with alarming frequency.

    --
    "He who laughs last, didn't get the joke."-Cap
  48. Efficiency Near 100% ? by istartedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course I haven't seen their simulations, but where does this "near 100%" figure come from? The first test is going to use a bullet (!) and they are projecting that a more refined version will use sound waves. Something has to produce those sound waves, and the waves have to be powerful enough to alter the characteristics of the crystal.

    Now I understand that in theory a light wave at a given frequency could transform to a higher frequency and lower intensity (conservation of energy is not violated), but that's analogous to changing the gear ratio on a motor. A gear system always introduces some loss.

    Now, given that any practical implementation of this will require a wave generator that's likely to make some noise, I don't see it ending up in lightbulbs or solar cells. If you want to get more light to a solar cell, focusing a mirror on it and keeping it cool is probably more practical.

    However, the medical imaging tech sounds like a great application. Noise from medical scanners is an acceptable part of that experience.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?