Slashdot Mirror


Ant Farm PC

secolactico writes "This has got to be the coolest case mod I've come across. An ant farm in your PC case. Too bad there are no pics of the case actually on a working PC. It'd be interesting to observe the effect that the temperature and vibration of an operating PC would have on the ants."

9 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. FP + /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    FP, or pretty damn near it and it's already /.ed . Ouch.

    1. Re:FP + /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      You shmuck. It's still up.

      AC

  2. If this was *BSD the ants would do all the work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Then again the ants would probably rise up against their leaders then flee....

    Oh I jest.

  3. Repeat from fark! by jasonw61 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Man Oh Man, just aint enough news to go around.

  4. Modbombing and Interview Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Slashdot interviews send the best of the 5-rated user comments to an interview candidate. Users pick the best questions, and Slashdot sends the interview. Right?

    Maybe.

    Take a look at the Fyodor Interview. Scroll down to this comment which asks, in a polite fashion, whether Fyodor has ever chosen to use his hacking skills to break the law, and cites the Slashdot troll hacking incident detailed earlier in my journal. This question received a score of 5 from the users of Slashdot, and was therefore eligible to be part of Fyodor's interview.

    Today, alert reader Gendou pointed out that four days after the story posted, a flurry of moderation activity had occurred in this posts's thread. The post was moderated down as a "Troll", heavily, till it reached threshold 3, and every comment in the thread which mentioned Fyodor's hacking incident also received large quantities of "Troll" moderation.

    Now, who gets moderator points, opens up a four day old story, and starts using moderation to push an agenda? More than 5 points were used in the attack, which means that either a large group of users acting in concert attacked the thread, or a user who is gaming Slashdot's system attacked the thread, or an editor did it. Who was bent on removing any shred of legitimacy from complaints that this question was not forwarded to Fyodor?

    The users of Slashdot gave this comment a score of 5.

    Slashdot Moderation is unaccountable, and I don't know who did this. For now, I'd like anyone who saw that the users of Slashdot moderate this question to 5 to vouch for that fact in the comments, as I am vouching here. We may never find out who manipulated the comment scores, but we can set the record straight.

    1. Re:Modbombing and Interview Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      dude - its slashdot, who the fuck cares.

  5. hi can you please help me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    hi my computer got a virus and a friend told me to 'go to slashdot' because they said your smart

    help me please

    1. Re:hi can you please help me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Sure, download the virus cleaner from here.

  6. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    HA! Awsome .signature