Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

SCO Claims Linux Sales After Suit Irrelevant

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the this-is-only-gonna-get-more-messy dept.

molarmass192 writes "Here's the first reaction I've seen from SCO regarding the public's stance that the code they distributed under the GPL negates their claims on code in the Linux kernel. They claim that the lack of copyright notices "placed by the copyright holder" means that the GPL does not protect the unmentioned code in question. "

2 of 563 comments (clear)

  1. GPL == ? by greendoggg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    According to the article, GPL == "General Public License." Great job media people!

  2. Quit feeding the trolls by missing000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seth's a fucking troll. If you think otherwise, read his stupid journal.