Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Shocking Clothing

Posted by michael on from the material-girl dept.

harmonics writes "This is absolutely hysterical, it seems a "No-Contact Jacket" has been developed for women by MIT. This thing carries enough voltage to knock you on your duff (80,000 volts), and is decently stylish too. Now to find out how I can get my wife one. Just don't wear it in the rain!" The real question is whether the submitter knew the origin and full meaning of the word "hysterical".

8 of 603 comments (clear)

  1. designed by MIT girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait



    useless.....who the hell would wanna touch these ugly ass bitches anyway?

  2. Re:Women only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    "In fact, statistics from the Department of Justice show men are more likely to be victims of violent crime than women."
    Statistics can be used to make any argument whatsoever. There are many reasons that men are more involved in violent crime and it includes the fact that more men are...YOU'RE A FUCKING NIGGER! I FOUND YOU OUT JAMAL!!! GIVE ME MY CAR BACK YOU FUCKING COON!! I'M GOING TO GET YOU! STOP FUCKING AROUND ON THE LIBRARY'S COMPUTER AND GET BACK TO SITTING ON THE PORCH AND BEING A DRUNK LOSER, YOU FUCKING BANANA-EATING NIGGER!...commiting violent crimes. Furthermore, men are more often out in public alone as most women should be at home in the kitchen, where they belong. What this leads us to is the fact that men who are the victims of violent crime don't deserve the fun jacket because they are pussies that cannot fight for themselves. On the other hand, women are weak and deserve protection. You're suggesting that men deserve to have this fun jacket because women get to have it. I bet you're one of these no-dicked fags that believes men deserve to play on the LPGA just because my girlfriend is playing in a PGA event. Christ, get a dick buddy - and then play some football, you douchebag.
  3. who wants to touch MIT women? by u19925 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    enough said!

  4. I've got the perfect accessory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Called "Don't You Fucking Look At Me Glasses" they perform retinal scans and can deliver a high intensity beam of light directly into some offending pervert's eyeballs.

    Coming soon to a FemNazi Police State near you (closest here would be Cambridge MA)

  5. Re:Cruel Intentions... by katarac · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Are you serious? Does this really puzzle you? It's just the way that the term has been used in the past when addressing women. Wife beaters throughout history have been barking orders at women while calling them "woman" just to remind them that they aren't men, and don't deserve the same respect. Of course it's gonna offend your "female friend" when you use it in the same context.

  6. Re:those MIT frat boys by lionchild · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Now, now...it could easily have been concieved and built by the fine engineers at the University of Missouri, Rolla. (The ratio there fluxes between 9:1 and 12:1, males:female.) But, in the Ozarks, we like to pride ourselves on creating engineers that have some common sense, as well as being smart. ;-)

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  7. Re:Possible Criminal Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Men are EEEEVVVIIILLL!!!
    Fuckin femminist bitches.
    Shoot em all

  8. Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I was having breakfast with my wife one morning, and while I has intended to say, "Honey, could you pass me the butter", it came out as, "YOU RUINED MY LIFE, YOU FUCKING BITCH!"