Slashdot Mirror


Searching for Keyboards Loaded with Features?

halfgeek asks: "I was just considering how keyboard-centric I've managed to make my setup, even under the mouse-hungry Windows GUI (no shouting; I regularly SSH to my Linux routing box for experiments, bring up VMWare when I need some X, and can't live without Cygwin). Almost everything I would want to do can be done without moving a hand to the mouse. I can open up an SSH to my server with Win+Shift+V, bring up a calculator with Win+C, run a one-shot console command with Win+0, open up the MW dictionary website to a highlighted word by hitting Ctrl+C (to copy) and then Win+Enter (to look up the contents of the clipboard). (Much of this is implemented with Perl programs and WinKey.) I also make frequent use of the volume knob and mute button built into my Logitech keyboard. If there is any good route to finding the keyboard I want with all the features I'm thinking of at a justifiable price, whether prefabricated or a wicked mod, I would just love to know about it." There are quite a few options the submitter is looking for, but it basically boils down to is this: the more keys, the better. What keyboards have you found, in your browsing travels, that have been stuffed full of useful features?

"I'm aggravated over having the mouse still so separate from the keyboard, and I've been looking through the available options along the lines of keyboards with built-in touchpads. The closest I've found to what I want seems to be the Adesso WKB-120, but this is by no means the ideal choice. It does have three basic properties I want: One, it doesn't have the ergo-split form I so despise. Two, its touchpad is situated in the right place, just below the space bar. Three, it's all one piece, so I can keep the board off the desk and on my knees, where it belongs, eh. But it also appears to have those three intensely undesirable and horribly misplaced power management keys, and lacks the volume knob, mute button, and media controls. An illuminated keyboard would also be cool, but I'd take standard beige; it's just that my current black keyboard is hard to see in the dark."

20 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. IBM trackpoint keyboards. by FrenZon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love my trackpoint (nipple) pointer that juts up in the middle of my keyboards - while it's not as accurate as a mouse or even trackpad, it's good enough to click on links or select the words/fields I need, with an absolute minimum of movement - I hate having to move my thumb down to a trackpad on a laptop, and then having to move it ALL the way across its surface a few times to get what I want.

    I lament how trackpoints are disappearing off laptop keyboards these days.

    1. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny
      I love my trackpoint (nipple) pointer that juts up in the middle of my keyboards
      The technical term is "clit mouse" - I shit you not.

      It is a not-so-accidental abbreviation of "cute little thumb mouse".

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    2. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by einTier · · Score: 4, Informative
      Personally? I love them. Cannot stand the trackpads. I can't imagine any geek liking them over an extended period of time. Why? Let me count the ways.

      1. Trackpads are imprecise. Very imprecise. I can get incredible precision out of my trackpoint, nearly as good as I can with a mouse. To achieve the proper granularity out of the trackpad, I've got to jack up the sensitivity, which leads to the other problem.
      2. There's not a 1:1 relationship with the screen. To move the pointer across the screen (unless it's a banzai run, and sometimes not even then), you've got to drag, lift, drag, lift, drag, lift, rinse, repeat. I feel like I'm using a mouse on a desk about two inches square. If I get pointer to the point where I can move it quickly, I can't get the fine control I need.
      3. With all that lifting and pushing, inevitably, I get a nice 'click' when I didn't want one. God forbid I should touch down on the pad with a double touch, then I might really do something I didn't want.
      4. The touchpad is under my thumbs. Who in the world thought this was a good idea? OK, yes, I know that you can set it to turn off the touchpad when you're typing -- but it's still a hack, and you shouldn't have to do it. Even when it's 'turned off', it's still possible to do actions you didn't intend, particularly if you pause for a second to study your code. It's just another imperfection of the touchpad.
      5. This is kind of a continuation of the above, but one of the things I love about my trackpoint is that I can use the mouse and never take my hands off the keyboard. It's the best of both worlds. On the few occasions I need to use the mouse, it's right at my fingertips. I don't have to move my hands or anything except move my index finger over a bit and my thumb down.

        I know there are others, but it's 2:30, and that's all I can think of for now.

        I find most people who have trouble with trackpoints have problems for two reasons. Number one, they don't realize that the harder you push, the faster the pointer moves. Slow pushes give you great precision. Hard pushes zoom the thing across the screen. Number two, most people aren't used to pushing on something that doesn't move and getting a response. The stalk isn't supposed to move, but it will record even the slightest brush of your fingertips.
      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  2. The most useful keyboard for me. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The most useful keyboard for me is a standard keyboard:

    Nice standard wide space bar, without the never-used Windows keys

    Backslash above a regular-height enter key (no double-high enter key with the backslash in any of 5 other locations).

    Standard layout, not the "think before you hit every key" (un)natural keyboard.

    The superior tactile click of the IBM keyboard from the PC-AT era. I don't think these are around any more, and nothing still even comes close.

    If there is one thing that should be standard, it is a keyboard layout. Extras are fine, as long as they are outside of the regular key area, which should be left alone. It is pretty unreasonable to have to learn different touch typing for different keyboards: the basics should stay the same. Nothing more frustrating than trying to hit the blackslash and then realizing it is one of those perverse Logitech or E-One keyboards that has "more enter key" where the backslash is.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by stanmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes.. Try Ebay look for IBM PS/2 Model M type keyboards... Built like a brick(literally can be used to put a nail into a board). and no Windows key.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  3. There's only one answer, no need for a thread: by FFFish · · Score: 4, Informative

    PCKeyboard, who own the rights to the venerable IBM high-tactile keyboards (aka "the wing of death").

    They also have myriad options and some extremely programmable/configurable keyboards.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:There's only one answer, no need for a thread: by Trixter · · Score: 2, Informative

      They may own the rights, but you can get original IBM 101-key keyboards from ebay regularly for about $12. I own 7 myself (Best. Keyboard. Ever.) for all my machines.

      My co-workers hate me, BTW. They claim the noise is deafening, but an average of 100 words per minute can't be wrong! :-)

  4. Focus Electronic by Drakon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use a keyboard from Focus Electronic called the FK-8200
    I sincerly regret not waiting for the FK-9200 to become available, since it has a trackball in the center of the keyboard.
    This keyboard is great.. it has a built in calculator, a clock with batteries for when the machine is off, and 12 macro keys that can be mapped to just about anything..

  5. Aren't the combo keys better? by chjones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the ideas---I, too, have a Logitech keyboard (specifically, the Cordless Elite Duo) with volume, mute, etc. keys built in, and several shortcuts set up in (at least) a similar way.

    Other than the volume and mute, and the wheel on the left side, though, I find the many additional buttons along the top almost as distracting as a mouse. Right now, they're essentially all mapped to different websites, and I still have to look at them and pick out the right one before hitting it.

    Maybe it's because of too much Emacs, but I don't even think about my ctrl- or alt- keystrokes.

    Don't get me wrong, I love your ideas; out of curiosity, have you tried using all the "miscellaneous" buttons and specifically liked those better?

    --

    Christian Jones
    Medicine. Mathematics. Mediocrity.

  6. Keyboard Hall of Shame by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Enough about the best and most useful keyboards. How about the worst ones?

    Here's a couple to start with:

    The first Macintosh. I think Apple was so awestruck with the new idea of the GUI that it looks like the keyboard was a mere afterthought with the the first Mac. What they ended up including was designed to encourage mouse-usage; with its heavy-force keystroke requirements and its almost rudimentary nature.

    the Atari 400
    Anyone remember saving $400 over the price of the full-keyboard Atari 800 by getting one of these things? It spawned a cottage industry of replacement keyboards.

    TRS-80 Color Computer. The keyboard on the "ColorTRaSh" was eventually improved, but the earlier models had Fisher-Price written all over.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  7. Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by farnsworth · · Score: 3, Insightful
    even under the mouse-hungry Windows GUI

    Are you insane? I don't care for Windows, but it is the most advanced mouseless UI there is. You can do everything without even having a mouse plugged in at all. The same cannot be said for gnome/kde or X in general. Granted, Windows is decidedly not a CLI, like your ssh sessions, but it's still the best there is if you don't like to use a mouse.

    I recall reading something about how some beta of windows 95 or NT 3.x failed a DOD acceptance test because a lot of it depended on the mouse, so Microsoft spent considerable time making it work fine in case of mouse failure.

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

    1. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Drakon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In ION under X I don't have to touch my mouse. ever.
      just FYI
      It's basically the 'killer app' that's keeping me on linux... I can run Xchat, Gaim, Phoenix (or whatever it's called now), ZINF, etc, ad nausium. Putty is actually a better terminal than many of the linux ones, and I can do most of my development on a shell into another box. Windows is Free, and so is Linux. The only differences are (a) Xwin32 is much harder to crack than Xfree86 and (b) windows's Window Managment SUCKS.

    2. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Informative
      The same cannot be said for gnome/kde or X in general.
      I beg to differ: http://ratpoison.sourceforge.net
      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    3. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you insane? I don't care for Windows, but it is the most advanced mouseless UI there is.

      My Dell laptop's touchpad is knackered to the extent I have to turn it off permanently, so I have plenty of experience of using windows without a mouse (in the office I use a trackball). While quite a lot of features are available without the mouse, it isn't particularly easy to use and in general 'skinnable' apps (ie anything that isn't using standard windows widgets, increasingly common) suck bigtime.

      I find the best thing to do when I'm unplugged from my mouse is to fire up xemacs full screen. Its no longer my day-to-day tool of choice, but emacs has so many built in features I can pretty much get by without using anything else, and mouseless operation is trivial - its what it was designed for.

      For example, there is nothing in windows like C-h k (describes a single key binding) or C-h m (describes the current mode's key bindings)[1], or even a hint that will describe the key binding for actions you take.

      Windows may well be the best mouseless UI that was originally designed to be used with a mouse but its not even close to being the best mouseless UI.

      -Baz

      [1] I know windows-space is roughly equivalent if you have intellitype, but its not a default feature of windows, and doesn't show app-specific bindings.

    4. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes it can. I do everything using the keyboard, including moving and resizing windows under X (with sawfish.) I kid you not! Care to show me how to do that in windows?

      With pleasure.

      Use the ALT-space key combination. This will bring up that window's control menu, including options to Restore (switch between full screen or windowed view), Minimize, Maximize, Close...and Size or Move. If you select Size or Move, you can then resize the window or move the window around the screen using the arrow keys. When done, press the Enter key. Presto -- all without a mouse.

      You're welcome.

  8. roundup by yarbo · · Score: 4, Informative
  9. PI Engineering's X-Keys by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Informative

    PI Engineering make a range of rather nifty "keyboard extenders" for all those keyboard macros. I've got my eyes on an X-Keys "Stick" or two, but want the USB version which has been "coming soon" for a few months now, so should be imminent. The only drawback is that the management software utility is Windows only, although you can still program the keys directly or use a Windows PC and then tranfer the keyboard to a Mac/*NIX box. Since you have Windows anyway that shouldn't be a major problem in your case though. They seem open to developing custom solutions though, so *might* be prepared to provide the info necessary to develop a *NIX version of the programming tool. In my experiences with programmable keyboards however that's only really of use to people who need to either bulk program the things or flip between application specific macro sets.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  10. The Commodore Pet by RocketJeff · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While those are bad keyboards, the worst of all time has to be the one on the original Commodore Pet - it had tiny keys laid out in straight rows/columns and they were laid out alphabetically (not qwerty or Dvorak). If you knew anything about typing, it was painful to use!

    The later versions of the Pet had standard keyboards - it made the Pet into a good, usable computer.

  11. Touchstream Keyboards by Argot · · Score: 2, Informative

    I repeatedly drool over Touchstream keyboards. I can't justify the expense, but the entire keyboard is a touch-sensitive surface (like those laptop glide pads), and has an absurd number of macro functions (including ones for emacs).

  12. The Northgate OmniKey is the Holy Grail by hirschma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry, as nice as the 'M' is, there is no comparison to a Northgate Omnikey, especially the Ultra .

    I still have one. It weighs over 10 pounds, so it doesn't move. The feel of the keys is heavenly - perfect amount of force to depress, and a wonderful click when you do. All the keys are where they should be, including a superior diamond pattern for the cursor keys.

    If you haven't used one, you don't know what you're missing. Northgates are still the golden standard for anyone who knows.

    jonathan