Slashdot Mirror
Aimee Deep Interview
LawGeek writes "Aimee Deep is probably most famously known as the highly attractive cover-girl of Madster (formerly known as Aimster). Since being involved with Madster (her father's business), she has had the opportunity to become more interested in legal and business issues surrounding the music distribution business and now blogs on the subject. Greplaw editor Mikael Pawlo recently interviewed the 18-year old Ms. Deep on various topics."
Back when her father was just starting Madster I met him and Aimee while the guy working behind their local CompUSA's Upgrades (read: Help) Desk (Albany NY region) - got to chatting about filesharing and some of the finer legal points (particularly the differences between what we do see and ought to see) of it with them.
I dunno, she just wasn't that hot in person . . . a little too much makeup. I honestly think her father encourages it - he seemed quite proud of her being all tarted up (and I say this as a completely amoral individual - it was a bit ridiculous).
I agree - this is ridiculous. There's a saying: "You used to be famous because you were somebody. Now you're somebody because you're famous."
Sure, we'd all like to see her naked and petrified with hot grits down her pants, and, like another poster said, lord have mercy on all the jokes that come with that name, but who on Slashdot could possibly care what an 18 year old poster girl has to say about the legal issues of IP?
Spare me.
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok
God bless this site, but for Bob's sake it's nothing but a bunch of 18 year old (physically or otherwise) boys spouting off on the legal issues of IP and occasionally even more weighty topics.
If there's one place that M. Nobody Inparticular can feel free to spout off like an authority on any topic, it's got to be slashdot.
So - not to get too serious - but is the problem that she's a girl?
No, the problem is that the pompous rants of the average 18 year old Slashdotter doesn't make the headlines - at best they get a +2, informative. Why should it be any different just because somebody's got a set of boobs?
I get enough of the obsession with sex at practically every other magazine, news site, TV channel etc. ad nauseam nowadays. Even the computer games magazines try to sell a few more issues with a hot chick on the cover, for Christ's sake. I want to believe Slashdot is an exception. I come here to read about tech, and to find this nonsensical celebrity worship over here as well just pisses me off.
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok
It never ceases to amaze me how nit-picky geek guys are about women.
I knew a guy once that looked like Beavis. I'm not kidding. The guy was the spitting image of Beavis, down to the hair, oversize head, and everything. He'd never had a girlfriend in his life. Various women would show interest in him (never mind how desperate they must have been), but he rejected them, because they weren't supermodel-caliber in the facial appearance and body departments.
Who the hell was this Beavis to care? But he did. And as far as I know he's still never had a girlfriend.
What nobody seems to have pointed out are that the two images of "Aimee Deep" - one on Madster.com, and one on MusicPundit.com - don't look like the same person!
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
What the hell is wrong with you? She looks like she's in pretty decent shape to me. A lot better than I was at 18, or even 15. I'm sorry that curves turn you off. I'm even more sorry that you help to perpetuate the idea that women have to starve themselves and work out obsessively to be beautiful.
If you think she's a fat cow, I'd hate to know what you think about me. (I was 17-18 when these pictures were taken.)
But if starved chicks are the only ones attractive to you, I guess you've been single for a while now, huh?
Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?